The New Republic laments NYT’s “squeamishness” about abortion

According to Debbie Nathan of The New Republic, the New York Times is sending a "conflicting message" about abortion – i.e., not radically and systematically pro-abortion – in an attempt to appeal to their "older and more educated" liberal demographic:

What is The New York Times‘ problem with abortion? The editorial page consistently supports sex education, birth control, and the right to legally end unwanted pregnancy. The rest of the Times, however, often seems uncomfortable with concrete applications of these principles. Not a season goes by that a news item or magazine feature doesn’t imply that women who get abortions are acting with egotism, unhealthiness, and cruelty.

When they are really heroically celebrating their most sacred feminine power. What were you thinking, Times, you old harpy? Get back in line!