<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mich. Supreme Court: Domestic partner benefits barred by marriage amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/05/07/mich-high-court-says-homosexual-partners-cant-get-health-benefits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/05/07/mich-high-court-says-homosexual-partners-cant-get-health-benefits/</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.2-alpha</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ADF Alliance Alert</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/05/07/mich-high-court-says-homosexual-partners-cant-get-health-benefits/#comment-6376</link>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 19:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=3278#comment-6376</guid>
		<description>Benefits are fine so long as their distribution is not based on legal recognition of a relationship that undermines marriage. That is the key. It has nothing to do with hatred. It is about the definition of marriage -- pure and simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Benefits are fine so long as their distribution is not based on legal recognition of a relationship that undermines marriage. That is the key. It has nothing to do with hatred. It is about the definition of marriage &#8212; pure and simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary47</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2008/05/07/mich-high-court-says-homosexual-partners-cant-get-health-benefits/#comment-6374</link>
		<dc:creator>gary47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 19:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=3278#comment-6374</guid>
		<description>Proving once again the "Defense" of marriage is about hatred of gays, not protecting marriage</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proving once again the &#8220;Defense&#8221; of marriage is about hatred of gays, not protecting marriage</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
