Which States Have the Best (and Worst) High Courts?



Choi, Stephen J., Gulati, G. Mitu and Posner, Eric A., “Which States Have the Best (and Worst) High Courts?” (May 1, 2008). U of Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 405 Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1130358

This paper ranks the high courts of the fifty states, based on their performance during the years 1998-2000, along three dimensions: opinion quality (or influence as measured by out-of-state citations), independence (or non-partisanship), and productivity (opinions written). We also discuss ways of aggregating these measures. California and Delaware had the most influential courts; Georgia and Mississippi had the most productive courts; and Rhode Island and New York had the most independent courts. If equal weight is given to each measure, then the top five states were: California, Arkansas, North Dakota, Montana, and Ohio. We compare our approach and results with those of other scholars and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, whose influential rankings are based on surveys of lawyers at big corporations.



2 Comments

  1. Harold
    Posted May 21, 2008 at 9:32 pm | Permalink

    California has the worst high court, totally political-Liberal

  2. CO CO
    Posted June 21, 2008 at 9:27 am | Permalink

    I DON’T THINK THIS IS AN ACCURATE ACCOUNT OF COURTS.

Comments

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*