The Court concluded that Homosexuals are a special classification because of their political presence and claims that they are discriminated against.

Promiscuous sexual intercourse is wrong and sinful (not that believers are without such sin). Homosexuals, on the other hand, have never held that their promiscuous same-sex practices are wrong.

They have in fact boisterously exclaimed such practices in their Gay Pride events and incidents of Bath House conduct, all of which have been a source of criticism by both religious and non religious peoples who are offended by promiscuous sexual conduct that has promulgated, by way of one example, the AIDS epidemic in the USA.

The Court’s rationale is based on the homosexual “Sexual Orientation” theory which includes the proclaimed “glbt” designations of Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender populations.

The fallacy in the Court’s finding is obvious: Bisexuals and Transgender people are not discriminated against because they are prohibited from marrying. They typically have no need to marry in a same-sex relationship. Further, the Bisexual population subscribes to a fully promiscuous lifestyle and represents by far the largest group of the Homosexual Classification. A prominent number of Bisexuals are married in heterosexual relationships and deceitfully violate the marriage commitment with tragic results.