ADF Alliance Alert

Intelligent Design in Public University Science Departments: Academic Freedom or Establishment of Religion?
Frank S. Ravitch, 16 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 1061 (2008)

In recent years issues surrounding intelligent design theory in the public schools have come to the fore. Intelligent design theory (ID) devolved/evolved from the creation science movement, itself a descendent of creationism. Most of the cases involving creation science or ID concern either the direct teaching of the subject in public secondary school science courses or the use of disclaimers when evolution is taught which state that it is only a theory and often allude to creation science, creationism, or ID. Yet, a number of “experts” cited by ID proponents are professors at public universities. While some of these experts are in philosophy or religion departments, others are in science departments, including biology. The question naturally arises whether these universities can preclude such professors from teaching or researching ID as faculty members in a science department. There is also the question of whether allowing these individuals to teach ID in the science curriculum is an establishment of religion. Related to both of these questions is the query of whether ID theory can be considered science in regard to these issues.

In Part I, this Article suggests that universities may determine that ID is not science and thus preclude professors from teaching it in university science departments. Such a determination has significant doctrinal and philosophical implications. Science departments may also consider research by ID theorists under their general tenure policies, which usually require a tenure candidate to have been published in peer reviewed journals and the evaluation of a tenure candidate’s scholarship by outside evaluators in the relevant scientific field (i.e., biology, chemistry, geology, astronomy, etc.). If the scholarship is deemed inadequate by such experts, the department, college, and/or university may take whatever action is normally taken where evaluators find scholarship lacking in quality or depth. This does not preclude the possibility that such work might be appropriate in a religion or philosophy department. In Part II, this Article suggests that teaching ID in a public university science department may pose Establishment Clause problems depending on the specific facts involved. Questions of academic freedom and free speech generally are highly relevant in addressing these issues.

Share This