NJ Supreme Court: Cohabitation not needed to get palimony



The AP reports on Newsday: “Two people don’t have to live together for one to be eligible for palimony when the relationship ends, the state Supreme Court ruled Tuesday.”

The ruling: Devaney v. Lesperance, No. A-20-7 (N.J., June 17, 2008)


Share This

Published Tuesday, June 17, 2008 1:11 PM
Filed under Headlines ,
Tagged as , ,
Subscribe to Post Comments

2 Comments

  1. pauly
    Posted June 17, 2008 at 10:22 pm | Permalink

    So the Doctor’s wife enjoys spending his money and in the process stops having sparkling
    eye’s for him. The Doc,fines a new toy,makes offers he never plans to keep and the new toy
    hooks up with some guy and they hide away in the Doctors condo -woman scorn! The toy
    gets evicted and the Jersey courts get involved. The toy gets nothing and the Doc probably
    has a new chiya by now . So back at the mansion the wife keeps her tea party’s going and
    all is well. Hello America!

  2. CO CO
    Posted June 21, 2008 at 9:08 am | Permalink

    crazy lawyers in black robes destroying America.

Comments

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*