Judicial Malfunction
Chuck Colson has this article on the Christian Post. He writes:
The nudity angered many viewers, and gave the world a cynical new term: “wardrobe malfunction.” Jackson’s wardrobe is not the only thing that malfunctioned; so did the Third Circuit Court of Appeals . . .
While many Americans are angry at the court, they ought to understand this story is not just about activist judges second guessing the FCC: It is also about a willingness to corrupt. It is not enough, it seems, to make strippers available to those who seek them out in seedy clubs. It is about a desire to expose everyone to filth, whether they want to be exposed to it or not—even innocent children . . .
Related:
3rd Circuit Strikes Down COPA — Again
3rd Circuit: Child Online Protection Act facially violates First and Fifth Amendments
3rd Circuit strikes fine against CBS for Janet Jackson Super Bowl nudity