The Role of Religion in the Defeat of the 1937 Court-Packing Plan
The Role of Religion in the Defeat of the 1937 Court-Packing Plan
William G. Ross, 23 J.L. & Religion 629 (2008)
(An excerpt is below. To view the full text, please use Westlaw, Lexis, a law library or alternative source.)
Religious issues and clergy played a prominent and now largely forgotten role in the defeat of President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s controversial 1937 proposal to add six Justices to the U.S. Supreme Court. Although many prominent Protestant, Roman Catholic, and Jewish clergy and lay persons shared Roosevelt’s frustration with the Court’s obstruction of legislation to ameliorate the ravages of the Great Depression and reform the nation’s economic system, many of the New Deal’s most ardent supporters feared that Roosevelt’s plan threatened religious liberty by making the Court vulnerable to political pressure. Opposition to Court-packing among clerics and lay persons, who warned that it could subject religious minorities to majoritarian tyranny, may have contributed heavily to the plan’s defeat. The prevalence of these fears that diminution of judicial independence would threaten religious freedom helps to demonstrate that the Supreme Court already was widely regarded as an important guardian of personal liberty on the eve of the Court’s transition from its long-time role as a defender of property rights to its modern role as a protector of personal rights.