Matt Bowman: Judicial activism in Montana assisted suicide case



By Matt Bowman
An attorney with the Alliance Defense Defense Fund

Judicial activism lives. Last Friday a state trial judge in Montana imposed assisted suicide on the entire state against the will of the people.

Montana’s criminal law, enacted by elected representatives, penalizes assisted suicide as a crime, and its “Rights of the Terminally Ill Act” expressly states that the people are not authorizing assisted suicide. Yet the state court trumped these laws by finding a right to assisted suicide in the constitution of the State of Montana.

Perhaps even more startling, the plaintiffs who demanded this result were not merely two patients with terminal illnesses, but they also included four doctors affiliated with St. Patrick Hospital in Missoula, Montana.

St. Patrick’s is a Catholic hospital, and is part of an outspokenly pro-life hospital network in the northwest called Providence Health & Services. Last month when a referendum passed in the State of Washington legalizing assisted suicide, Providence and some of its hospital leaders quickly issued a statement declaring that their doctors and hospitals would not be administering assisted suicide.

Four doctors are plaintiffs the Montana lawsuit, and they successfully demanded that the court override the will of the people and legalize assisted suicide by judicial fiat. They include Dr. George Risi, Jr., who is the Committee Chair for Infection Control at St. Patrick’s.

Dr. C. Paul Loehnen and Dr. Lar Autio are both in the medical staff directory of St. Patrick’s. And Dr. Stephen Speckart says in the lawsuit that he is an oncologist at the Montana Cancer Center, which is closely affiliated with St. Patrick’s. (The MCC website does not currently list Dr. Speckart on its physicians page, though it does display his resume.)

Importantly, as the basis for bringing this lawsuit, all these doctors pointed to their regular care for terminal patients, and their desire to provide “aid in dying” including assisted suicide. They asserted, on behalf of their patients, the constitutional “right” to assisted suicide. The court specifically upheld their legal standing to sustain this case. The court placed great reliance on the physician’s role, and it distinctly declared the physician’s “right” to assist in a suicide.

It is unclear how many of these doctors’ terminal patients are cared for through St. Patrick’s, but it would be surprising to find out that there is no connection at all.  The doctors therefore seem to be using their history of care through St. Patrick’s as a tool to help them impose legal assisted suicide on Montana.  This also raises the issue of whether their desire to assist suicides would include situations in which patients are receiving treatment from them through St. Patrick’s.

I cannot find any information suggesting that St. Patrick Hospital knows that these doctors have abused their duty-to-heal in this fashion. I imagine that the doctors did not tell St. Patrick’s about it, especially since the hospital network is so outspokenly pro-life. St. Patrick Hospital and Providence Health & Services should be given some time to consider this information internally and to respond appropriately. I am confident that they will continue their strongly pro-life record in the State of Montana.  (I am not calling for any campaign to contact the hospitals–I just think it is important to highlight these doctors’ apparent connection with Catholic healthcare.)

Assisted suicide victimizes people with illnesses. As Mailee Smith at AUL points out, not even the moderate limits on assisted suicide in Oregon and Washington exist under the Montana court’s exercise of policy-making. The court simply imposed a limitless regime in which the many abuses of assisted suicide can run rampant.

Catholic hospitals have a basic right not to participate in abortion and assisted suicide, and not to affiliate themselves with employees who publicly advocate and practice such atrocities. Religious organizations give truly compassionate care to the sick and dying. Their consistent witness is the most important asset we have in creating a culture of life in the medical field.



2 Comments

  1. Bill Duehring
    Posted December 12, 2008 at 11:59 am | Permalink

    Thank you Matt for this informative letter. It leaves me not to ponder other questions, such as: Are the Doctors Catholics? Did they sign any contracts, or agreements, regarding their arrangements with St Patricks? They must know that there actions are against the pro-life standings of the hospital and furthermore the Catholic Church..not to forget our God. As I have said many times, God will only tolerate so much as witnessed by his previous actions. Is He getting angry enough, or when will He?

  2. Eleni Rigual
    Posted December 12, 2008 at 2:50 pm | Permalink

    Thanks Matt for bringing this to light. It’s appalling that we allow these judges to get away with legislating from the bench. The greatest evils in our country have been perpetuated by activist judges and the greatest threat to our country is not the enemy on the outside but the enemy within. God will not be mocked and I believe judgment has already begun. May God have mercy upon us.

Comments

Your email address is never published nor shared. Comments should be relevant, respectful, informative, and insightful. Opinions should be supported by appropriate analysis. All comments are moderated and will not appear online until approved by a moderator. Inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted without explanation. Required fields are marked *

*
*