Virginia: County prosecutor won’t charge middle schoolers in ‘sexting’ case

Polyamorists call for group marriage

Obama’s DOMA pledge to homosexuals disappears from official agenda

Michigan lawmakers weigh changes to “bias crime” law

South Carolina bills would allow social gambling

North Dakota Governor signs pro-life bills on abortion, ultrasound

    LifeNews: “North Dakota Gov. John Hoeven has signed a couple of pro-life bills into law, including one that would allow mothers to see an ultrasound of their unborn child prior to an abortion. The other measure requires the lone abortion center in the state to tell women considering an abortion that it will destroy the life of an unborn child, a unique human being.”


  • Posted: 05/13/2009
  • |
  • Category: Sanctity of Life
  • |
  • Source: www.lifenews.com

  • Tags: ,

ADF: Militant homosexual group faces federal suit, Bash Back! invaded MI church in Nov.

Americans not concerned with diversity on Supreme Court, poll shows

Why Sexting Should Not Be Prosecuted as “Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor”

    Julie Hilden writes at Findlaw:
    There is no shortcut here: Legislators need to write new laws – and/or schools must write new policies — regarding sexting that are specifically geared toward the peculiarities of the practice as it exists among teenagers today. “Sexting” should not become a trap for the unwary; it should be addressed in a rational, consistent way, and in a way that eschews old categories to recognize its unique nature. Teens should also have clear prior notice of what they cannot do, and of what will happen to them if they break the rules.


  • Posted: 05/13/2009
  • |
  • Category: Miscellaneous
  • |
  • Source: writ.lp.findlaw.com

  • Tags: , , ,

California: Paper Explores Attempt To Organize A Good News Club

Liberty Legal Institute: Pastors win IRS Ruling

La. House passes bill restricting birth certificates for adoptions by unmarried couples

Pope gunman: I want to convert to Christianity

Phoenix: Neighbors file noise complaint about church bells

Senate Blocks Hayes as No. 2 at Interior Department

S.F. school board to vote on JROTC

    Ed News: “A three-year battle over whether Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps belongs in San Francisco schools ended Tuesday night with a 4-3 vote by the school board to restore the military leadership program weeks before its scheduled expiration.”


  • Posted: 05/13/2009
  • |
  • Category: Miscellaneous
  • |
  • Source: ednews.org

  • Tags: ,

Alabama amends judicial qualification requirements

    KEY PROVISIONS OF BILL: The bill requires that anyone sitting on State Supreme Court, courts of civil or criminal appeals be a licensed lawyer for at least 10 years. Circuit court judges will now need five years law license and District court three years law license. The legislation takes effect during the 2010 Alabama election cycle. Current incumbent judges will be exempted.


  • Posted: 05/13/2009
  • |
  • Category: Bench & Bar

  • Tags: , ,

NY State Assembly approves marriage redefinition; fate rests with Senate

Illinois AG: Craigslist To Drop ‘Erotic Services’ Ads

Gender-bending chemical timebomb fear for boys’ fertility

Media bailout: Wash. gov OKs tax cut for newspapers

Domestic partnership registry runs afoul of Ohio Constitution

Norfolk, Va., agrees to respect Constitutional rights of Christians

    CitizenLink: “‘Christians are not required to request permission from the government before exercising their First Amendment rights,’ said Nate Kellum, senior counsel for ADF. ‘We are pleased that Norfolk officials have agreed to respect the constitutional rights of Christians citizens, and that they can now express their faith freely and without fear of harassment or arrest.’”


  • Posted: 05/13/2009
  • |
  • Category: Uncategorized
  • |
  • Source: www.citizenlink.org

  • Tags: ,

The Irrational Woman: Informed Consent and Abortion Decision-Making

    SSRN: “This Article critiques the woman-protective anti-abortion argument from the perspective of healthcare law. It compares women’s healthcare decision-making under abortion law to patient decision-making under more general law. This Article is the first to demonstrate that the woman-protective argument against abortion is an anomaly in the law’s treatment of patient healthcare decision-making. It argues that the denial of pregnant women’s decision-making capacity in abortion law unjustifiably diverges from the law’s respect for patient decision-making capacity in both the tort law doctrine of informed consent and in constitutional law cases governing medical decision-making.”


  • Posted: 05/13/2009
  • |
  • Category: Sanctity of Life
  • |
  • Source: ssrn.com

  • Tags: ,

Dismembering Families

Law in Flux on Coverage for Same-Sex Couples