Baptist Press: “Jim Campbell, an attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund, another religious liberty legal organization, said a statute would be more likely to be overturned in court if it did nix previous marriages. But he agreed that New Hampshire could, if it wanted, reverse course on the overall issue of ‘gay marriage’ legalization. ‘Assuming the government has the authority to redefine marriage, it also has the authority to restore it to its traditional definition,’ he told BP.”
- Posted: 06/04/2009
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.sbcbaptistpress.org
- Tags: ADF: Jim Campbell, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Marriage and Family, Group: Cornerstone Policy Research, State: New Hampshire, Topic: Marriage
David Cortman, senior legal counsel with the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF), explains that the school initially capitulated to the ACLU’s demands . . .
‘[The] ACLU tends to pick on smaller communities throughout the country and basically looks to completely eradicate any mention of religion at all in the public square,’ the attorney explains.
‘And so we sent these letters to give some push-back to the ACLU to basically tell the school regardless of what they want you to do in their zeal to eliminate all mention of religion, what the law actually requires is that you allow the Christian clubs to meet on the same terms as other clubs.’”
- Posted: 06/04/2009
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.onenewsnow.com
- Tags: ADF: David Cortman, Alliance Defense Fund, State: Florida
Reuters: “New Hampshire’s Democratic-controlled House of Representatives endorsed gay marriage in a 198-176 vote, hours after the state Senate approved the legislation 14-10 along party lines, making the state the fourth this year to back gay marriage in the United States.
Governor John Lynch, a Democrat, signed the bill, which goes into effect on January 1.”
- Posted: 06/04/2009
- |
- Category: Featured
- |
- Source: www.reuters.com
- Tags: State: New Hampshire, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage
University of La Verne Law Review: “Supreme Court approval for a law that criminalizes the pandering of illegal materials, even when the actual materials are not illegal, represents an unprecedented change in the law. This Note first addresses the the statutory regulation of child pornography. Next, the rationale and reasoning behind Williams are covered. Finally, the Note explores the doctrinal significance of Williams.”
- Posted: 06/04/2009
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- Tags: Topic: Child Pornography, Topic: Legal Periodicals, Topic: Pornography
Cardozo Public Law, Policy and Ethics Journal: “In this Article, I explore judicial discretion under Halakhic law, Anglo-American law, and Israeli law. In Part I, I compare the differences in treatment of judicial discretion between the Palestinian Talmud and the Babylonian Talmud.”
- Posted: 06/04/2009
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Topic: Legal Periodicals
Pepperdine Law Review: “While similar cases have arisen in this country and abroad, nothing on the books is binding in the situation where a veiled Muslim woman testifies against a criminal defendant. Unsettling as this may be, the good news is that the United States Supreme Court has already laid out all of the rules necessary to formulate an answer. Yet in reaching that answer we tread on fragile grounds. The inevitable clash still remains: on one side we may have a Muslim woman who would rather sacrifice her liberty than remove her veil, while on the other we have a defendant who deserves the constitutional protection that this country’s laws guarantee. This Comment will analyze the veiled witness’s effect on the criminal defendant’s right to confrontation and will ultimately argue that such veiled testimony violates the Confrontation Clause.”
- Posted: 06/04/2009
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, Topic: Islam, Topic: Legal Periodicals
University of Hawaii Law Review: “The “individualized assessments” to which RLUIPA refers can potentially encompass many types of land use regulations. However, this paper focuses on zoning exceptions-specifically, the special use permit and the variance. Decisions regarding special use permits and variances are typically made on a case-by-case basis, thereby triggering the individualized assessment jurisdiction of RLUIPA.”
- Posted: 06/04/2009
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, Topic: Legal Periodicals, Topic: RLUIPA
Human Rights Quarterly: “This article argues that universal jurisdiction also serves another, less articulated purpose. It has a constitutive function as well. It is partly a process through which the identity of the international community is imagined and enacted. It is an expression of a sense of ourselves (a community of humankind) at given moments of time. This article argues that neglect of this constitutive dimension leads to an incomplete analysis of universal jurisdiction.”
- Posted: 06/04/2009
- |
- Category: Global
- |
- Source: ssrn.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Topic: International Law, Topic: Legal Periodicals
|

Latest Posts
-
www.necn.com
05/18/2012
NECN.com (AP): Democrats who control the Senate Judiciary Committee have agreed to give Gov. Chris Christie’s third nominee to the state Supreme Court a hearing, but the gay, black Republican will face difficulty being confirmed because of his lack of courtroom experience and his vow to stay out of same-sex marriage cases.
-
www.turtlebayandbeyond.org
05/18/2012
Turtle Bay and Beyond: The Secretary of Gender, Youth and Child Development in Trinidad and Tabago, Verna St Rose Greaves announced this week that she supports not only the legalization of abortion but also the promotion of gay rights.
-
www.charlotteobserver.com
05/18/2012
Charlotte Observer: Our first instinct, as opponents of North Carolina’s constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage, is to challenge it any way possible and show the harm it inflicts. So we understand those who encourage the Charlotte City Council to offer same-sex benefits to its employees – even if it gets the city sued. But council members made a smarter decision last night, voting 9-2 to get an opinion from the N.C. attorney general on the issue before including the benefits in the next fiscal year budget.

|