How will the health care bill approach end-of-life decisions?At Redstate.org, Erick Erickson gives a brief account of a conversation he overheard between a Congressional staffer and a “DC lobbyist” in which the staffer, an aide to Rep. Paul Tonko, opines that the “best part” of the Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 is “the increase in Hospice care which will solve the prolonging of life issue.” This passing comment refers to section 1233 (page 425 of the pdf file) of H.R. 3200 (Open Congress) which, according to Wesley J. Smith, seems to “require that people on Medicare receive an ‘Advance Care Planning Consultation’ every five years or when their health status changes.” That section, in relevant part, reads as follows:
The Tonko staffer seems to be implying that counseling for Medicare patients will have a more than “explanatory” effect–indeed, that it might go so far as to “solve the prolonging of life issue” by introducing policy priorities into end-of-life decision-making. Concerned about the bill’s social context, House Republican Leader John Boehner (R-OH) and Republican Policy Committee Chairman Thaddeus McCotter (R-MI) released a statement which includes this warning about a “slippery slope” toward euthanasia : “With three states having legalized physician-assisted suicide, this provision could create a slippery slope for a more permissive environment for euthanasia, mercy-killing and physician-assisted suicide because it does not clearly exclude counseling about the supposed benefits of killing oneself.” For further information: Is there a Euthanasia mandate hiding in Obama-care ObamaCare Dives Into End-Of-Life Debate Obamacare for old folks: Just ‘cut your life short’
|
