John Stemberger, president of the Florida Family Policy Council: “The decision by Judge Lederman is classic, text-book, judicial activism. Instead of interpreting and enforcing the plain language of the statute, which has been held constitutional by federal courts, she openly and brazenly defied the rule of law. She ignored the will of the people as expressed through the legislature and inserted her own personal opinion. Instead of exercising her proper judicial role as a restrained academic interpreter of existing law, she became a social change agent and usurped her limited role.”
- Posted: 08/25/2009
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: www.floridabaptistwitness.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Group: Florida Family Policy Council, State: Florida, Topic: Adoption, Topic: Homosexual Agenda
LifeSiteNews: “A federal court Monday threw out a lawsuit filed against the federal Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage as the union of one man and one woman . . . ‘Marriage is not just any two people in a committed relationship. Americans understand and believe that there’s more to a marriage than that. Therefore we are pleased that this challenge to the federal law defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman has been dismissed,’ said ADF Senior Counsel Brian Raum. ‘If another lawsuit is filed against the federal DOMA, we are confident that it will be found to be constitutional.’”
- Posted: 08/25/2009
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- |
- Source: www.lifesitenews.com
- Tags: ADF: Brian Raum, State: California, Topic: Federal DOMA, Topic: Homosexual Agenda
Baptist Press: “A lawsuit seeking to overturn Wisconsin’s same-sex domestic partnerships law as unconstitutional received a boost Aug. 21 when the state’s attorney general announced that he, too, believes the law conflicts with Wisconsin’s constitutional marriage amendment . . . The Alliance Defense Fund and its allied attorneys filed the suit on behalf of Wisconsin Family Action, the primary sponsor of the 2006 amendment. The high court has not said whether it will hear the case.”
- Posted: 08/25/2009
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- |
- Source: www.bpnews.net
- Tags: State: Wisconsin, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage
Forum 18: “Members of the New Life Full Gospel congregation in the capital Minsk refused to accept the latest official demands to give up the place of worship they bought back in 2002, the church’s lawyer Sergei Lukanin told Forum 18 News Service. Court executors delivered an order to vacate the building by 20 August, but church members have held a series of prayer meetings to defend their building.”
- Posted: 08/25/2009
- |
- Category: Global
- |
- Source: www.forum18.org
- Tags: Category: Global, Category: Religious Freedom, Country: Belarus
ACLJ: “On Friday, the circuit court sitting in Springfield, Ill. issued a preliminary injunction in the case of two pharmacy owners, Luke VanderBleek and Glenn Kosirog. Both men have been fighting to protect their conscience rights. The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), focusing on constitutional law, is representing the pharmacists in the case of Morr-Fitz, Inc. v. Blagojevich . . . ”
- Posted: 08/25/2009
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: www.aclj.org
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), State: Illinois, Topic: Abortion
ABP: “The bill establishes a statewide Human Trafficking Prevention Task Force in the attorney general’s office, creates a human trafficking training component for law-enforcement officers, starts a program to connect services to trafficking victims and begins a grant program for groups that provide assistance to domestic trafficking victims.”
- Posted: 08/25/2009
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: www.abpnews.com
- Tags: State: Texas, Topic: Trafficking
North Carolina Family Policy Council: “1. Early sexual activity has a myriad of negative consequences for adolescents that go beyond sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and teen pregnancy, which condoms cannot protect against . . . 2. Postponing sexual activity—even for a few years—is associated with fewer lifetime sexual partners and healthier lifetime outcomes for men and women . . . 5. Since AUM education was implemented in the mid-1990s, teen sexual activity has declined sharply nationwide, along with significant declines in the teen pregnancy rate, the teen birth rate (until 2006), and the teen abortion rate. . . .”
- Posted: 08/25/2009
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- |
- Source: www.ncfamily.org
- Tags: Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: North Carolina Family Policy Council, State: North Carolina, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Abstinence, Topic: Sex Indoctrination
Christian Post: “A federal judge on Monday threw out a lawsuit filed against the Defense of Marriage Act, saying that the suit had been improperly filed in state court before it was transferred to his jurisdiction . . . Though the gay Southern California couple that filed the lawsuit last December will likely refile, Brian Raum, senior counsel for Alliance Defense Fund, hailed Monday’s ruling. ‘[W]e are pleased that this challenge to the federal law defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman has been dismissed,’ said Raum.”
- Posted: 08/25/2009
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- |
- Source: www.christianpost.com
- Tags: ADF: Brian Raum, State: California, Topic: Federal DOMA, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, Topic: White House
Catholic News Agency: “A federal court has upheld portions of South Dakota’s informed consent law which require doctors to tell women considering an abortion that they are terminating a human life . . . ADF Senior Legal Counsel Steven H. Aden commented on the court ruling, saying ‘A woman’s life is worth more than Planned Parenthood’s bottom line, so we’re pleased the abortion industry failed in its attempt to strike down this law. We agree with the decision of the court to allow South Dakota women to be informed of the indisputable fact that her baby is a human being.’”
- Posted: 08/25/2009
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- |
- Source: www.catholicnewsagency.com
- Tags: ADF: Steven H. Aden, Category: Sanctity of Life, State: South Dakota, Topic: Abortion
On Top Magazine: “The Obama administration has prevailed in its attempt to dismiss a challenge to the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the Los Angeles Times reported . . . The Christian-based Alliance Defense Fund (ADF), which as intervenor in Smelt is also defending DOMA, promoted the argument that there is a government interest in ‘responsible procreation’ . . . ‘It is very disappointing that the [Justice Department] has rejected the idea that kids do best in homes with a married mother and father,’ ADF attorney Brian Raum told Baptist Press.”
- Posted: 08/25/2009
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- |
- Source: ontopmag.com
- Tags: State: California, Topic: Federal DOMA, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, Topic: White House
LifeSiteNews: “Armed with sound legal principles and plenty of chutzpah, the Wisconsin Attorney General has told state lawmakers that he will not defend the state’s domestic partnership law for homosexual couples against a legal challenge . . . ‘We’re very hopeful and optimistic that the Wisconsin Supreme Court will take note of what the Attorney General said in his statement and they will use that as a favorable factor in determining whether to take this case,’ ADF Litigation Counsel Jim Campbell told LifeSiteNews.com.”
- Posted: 08/25/2009
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- |
- Source: www.lifesitenews.com
- Tags: ADF: Jim Campbell, Category: Sanctity of Life, State: Wisconsin, Topic: Abortion
Making Snow in the Desert: Defining a Substantial Burden under RFRA
Jonathan Knapp, 36 Ecology L.Q. 259 (2009)
“Despite RFRA’s lofty goal of repairing the damage to religious liberty caused by the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Employment Division v. Smith, as the Act is purposely ambiguous concerning the meaning to be supplied to all of its critical terms, such as what types of governmental action “substantially burden” the free exercise of religion, Congress simply returned a number of intractable issues to the courts. This lack of formal guidance in RFRA has resulted in pervasive confusion over how the term “substantial burden” should be defined and analyzed, conflict between appellate courts, and ultimately, profound limitation of the statute’s success.”
- Posted: 08/25/2009
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: www.boalt.org
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, Topic: Legal Periodicals, Topic: RFRA
Parental Rights and the State Regulation of Religious Schools
Matthew Steilen, 2009 B.Y.U. Educ. & L.J. 269
“In Wisconsin v. Yoder, the United States Supreme Court invalidated convictions of several Amish parents for removing their children from school in violation of state mandatory attendance laws. In reaching its decision, the Court argued that protecting the Amish parents’ decisions fit into a long-standing American tradition of giving parents control over the upbringing of their children. Yet the Supreme Court mischaracterized the history of parental rights and state interests in education. Contemporary historical research shows that parents have long ceded a large measure of control to the state in the education of their children. Still, very little has been written about this scholarship in legal journals. This article attempts to remedy this deficiency. It isolates and explores three key periods in the development of state-administered public schools, paying special attention to early public funding of religious schools, the Protestant character of the common schools, and Catholic resistance to the use of the King James Bible in common schools. In so doing, this article argues for a “republican” interpretation of early educational practices. Drawing on that interpretation, the article joins a debate between Noah Feldman, Martha Nussbaum, and others about the nature of American religious liberties, and argues that their views are not able to fully acknowledge the history of Protestant evangelizing in public schools.”
- Posted: 08/25/2009
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, Topic: Home School, Topic: Legal Periodicals, Topic: Parental Rights, Topic: School Choice
Toward an Integrated Disparate Treatment and Accommodation Framework for Title VII Religion Cases
Roberto L. Corrada, 77 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1411 (2009)
“This Article explores the interrelationship between accommodation and discrimination in Title VII religion cases. This Article begins with discussion and analysis of three typical Title VII mixed disparate treatment/ accommodation cases, demonstrating how malleable and ill-defined the lines between Title VII disparate treatment and accommodation cases can be. These cases show that it is likely that a good number of Title VII religion cases straddle the two frameworks, and that some number of those cases that do straddle the line are unnecessarily pigeonholed into one framework or another.”
- Posted: 08/25/2009
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, Topic: Legal Periodicals, Topic: Title VII
Constitutionality of Home Education: How the Supreme Court and American History Endorse Parental Choice
Chad Olsen, 2009 B.Y.U. Educ. & L.J. 399
“The year 2008 frightened many homeschooling parents. A California Court of Appeals case, In re Rachel L., appeared to close the door on many parents’ assumed right to home school their children. The court said, ‘[P]arents do not have a constitutional right to home school their children,’ and added that non-credentialed parents may not home school their children . . . Part II of this article provides the background information relevant to understanding the court’s rehearing decision in Jonathan. This includes information about Rachel and the concurrent publicity. Part III then analyzes Jonathan and its implications. Following this analysis, Part IV examines Supreme Court precedent that is relevant to home education. Next, Part V gives a historical perspective on home education in the United States.”
- Posted: 08/25/2009
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Topic: Education, Topic: Home School, Topic: Legal Periodicals, Topic: Parental Rights, Topic: School Choice
“Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota v. Rounds: The Journey to Protect Women’s Mental Health with Relevant, Truthful and Not Misleading Information in Informed Consent Abortion Statutes”
Kathleen G. Chewning, 3 Charleston L. Rev. 601 (2009)
“Finally in Part III, this Note addresses Planned Parenthood of Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota v. Rounds and its potential far-reaching effects on the future of informed consent abortion regulation.”
- Posted: 08/25/2009
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: Planned Parenthood, State: Minnesota, State: North Dakota, State: South Dakota, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Legal Periodicals
|

Latest Posts
-
www.necn.com
05/18/2012
NECN.com (AP): Democrats who control the Senate Judiciary Committee have agreed to give Gov. Chris Christie’s third nominee to the state Supreme Court a hearing, but the gay, black Republican will face difficulty being confirmed because of his lack of courtroom experience and his vow to stay out of same-sex marriage cases.
-
www.turtlebayandbeyond.org
05/18/2012
Turtle Bay and Beyond: The Secretary of Gender, Youth and Child Development in Trinidad and Tabago, Verna St Rose Greaves announced this week that she supports not only the legalization of abortion but also the promotion of gay rights.
-
www.charlotteobserver.com
05/18/2012
Charlotte Observer: Our first instinct, as opponents of North Carolina’s constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage, is to challenge it any way possible and show the harm it inflicts. So we understand those who encourage the Charlotte City Council to offer same-sex benefits to its employees – even if it gets the city sued. But council members made a smarter decision last night, voting 9-2 to get an opinion from the N.C. attorney general on the issue before including the benefits in the next fiscal year budget.

|