Colorado: Denver West principal ends his abstinence push

Understanding the legal challenge to Florida’s ban on homosexual adoption

Howard Dean: Obama will get health care bill

Federal court tosses lawsuit challenging federal DOMA

    LifeSiteNews: “A federal court Monday threw out a lawsuit filed against the federal Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage as the union of one man and one woman . . . ‘Marriage is not just any two people in a committed relationship. Americans understand and believe that there’s more to a marriage than that. Therefore we are pleased that this challenge to the federal law defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman has been dismissed,’ said ADF Senior Counsel Brian Raum. ‘If another lawsuit is filed against the federal DOMA, we are confident that it will be found to be constitutional.’”


  • Posted: 08/25/2009
  • |
  • Category: Uncategorized
  • |
  • Source: www.lifesitenews.com

  • Tags: , , ,

Harvey Milk inducted into California Hall of Fame

Wis. A.G. won’t defend same-sex law in court

    Baptist Press: “A lawsuit seeking to overturn Wisconsin’s same-sex domestic partnerships law as unconstitutional received a boost Aug. 21 when the state’s attorney general announced that he, too, believes the law conflicts with Wisconsin’s constitutional marriage amendment . . . The Alliance Defense Fund and its allied attorneys filed the suit on behalf of Wisconsin Family Action, the primary sponsor of the 2006 amendment. The high court has not said whether it will hear the case.”


  • Posted: 08/25/2009
  • |
  • Category: Uncategorized
  • |
  • Source: www.bpnews.net

  • Tags: , ,

Kyrgyzstan suppresses minority religious groups

AZ Townhall: McCain booed for suggesting President respects the Constitution

Archbishop calls for end to anti-Christian violence in India

Belarus: Authorities prepare again to expel New Life church from its own building

    Forum 18: “Members of the New Life Full Gospel congregation in the capital Minsk refused to accept the latest official demands to give up the place of worship they bought back in 2002, the church’s lawyer Sergei Lukanin told Forum 18 News Service. Court executors delivered an order to vacate the building by 20 August, but church members have held a series of prayer meetings to defend their building.”


  • Posted: 08/25/2009
  • |
  • Category: Global
  • |
  • Source: www.forum18.org

  • Tags: , ,

UK couples travel to USA for embryo sex selection

ACLJ: Preliminary Injunction Granted in IL Conscience Case – Pharmacists Score a Win in Long Battle for Their Rights

Court Orders Fed to Disclose Emergency Bank Loans

Illinois Appellate Court rules that automatically generated internet “cache” can establish “control” of child porn

Denmark: “Proposal would allow homosexual couples to use marriage language”

Lambda Legal calls for end to HIV travel ban

Wash. bans Capitol holiday displays, tree to stay

Texas: Prayer During NRH Council Meetings Drawing Flak

Wash. Secretary of State: “R-71 update: Signature count tops 100,000″

Cal. Senate approves resolution calling for end of “don’t ask, don’t tell”

ACLU’s Request to Jail Lisa Miller Fails in Virginia Court

“Step inside the Big Gay Ice Cream Truck”

N.J. activists from both sides prepare for “gay marriage” bill debate

Milk Day backers try to change governor’s mind

Georgetown Law School to Honor AFL-CIO Leader Despite Gay Marriage Advocacy

Priest Risks Life for Churchless Christians in Egypt

Bishop D’Arcy says Notre Dame must answer for honoring Obama

Seminary president: Southern Baptists must change or die out

U.N. Agency Calls for Teaching Children 5-to-8 Years of Age about Masturbation

Texas governor signs landmark human-trafficking legislation

    ABP: “The bill establishes a statewide Human Trafficking Prevention Task Force in the attorney general’s office, creates a human trafficking training component for law-enforcement officers, starts a program to connect services to trafficking victims and begins a grant program for groups that provide assistance to domestic trafficking victims.”


  • Posted: 08/25/2009
  • |
  • Category: Miscellaneous
  • |
  • Source: www.abpnews.com

  • Tags: ,

North Carolina FPC: Ten reasons to keep abstinence education in NC

Controversial vaccine defended by FDA

Elk River bucks discriminatory religious use policy after letter from ADF

Judge dismisses DOMA lawsuit on technicality

Court strikes down portions of S. Dakota informed consent law

    Catholic News Agency: “A federal court has upheld portions of South Dakota’s informed consent law which require doctors to tell women considering an abortion that they are terminating a human life . . . ADF Senior Legal Counsel Steven H. Aden commented on the court ruling, saying ‘A woman’s life is worth more than Planned Parenthood’s bottom line, so we’re pleased the abortion industry failed in its attempt to strike down this law. We agree with the decision of the court to allow South Dakota women to be informed of the indisputable fact that her baby is a human being.’”


  • Posted: 08/25/2009
  • |
  • Category: Uncategorized
  • |
  • Source: www.catholicnewsagency.com

  • Tags: , , ,

“Obama wins: Federal gay marriage suit tossed”

    On Top Magazine: “The Obama administration has prevailed in its attempt to dismiss a challenge to the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the Los Angeles Times reported . . . The Christian-based Alliance Defense Fund (ADF), which as intervenor in Smelt is also defending DOMA, promoted the argument that there is a government interest in ‘responsible procreation’ . . . ‘It is very disappointing that the [Justice Department] has rejected the idea that kids do best in homes with a married mother and father,’ ADF attorney Brian Raum told Baptist Press.”


  • Posted: 08/25/2009
  • |
  • Category: Uncategorized
  • |
  • Source: ontopmag.com

  • Tags: , , , ,

WI: City officials adopt recommended “invocations policy” despite threats

“US judge nixes suit that split Obama, gays”

State AG tells Wisconsin: Find someone else to defend “unconstitutional” domestic partnership law

    LifeSiteNews: “Armed with sound legal principles and plenty of chutzpah, the Wisconsin Attorney General has told state lawmakers that he will not defend the state’s domestic partnership law for homosexual couples against a legal challenge . . . ‘We’re very hopeful and optimistic that the Wisconsin Supreme Court will take note of what the Attorney General said in his statement and they will use that as a favorable factor in determining whether to take this case,’ ADF Litigation Counsel Jim Campbell told LifeSiteNews.com.”


  • Posted: 08/25/2009
  • |
  • Category: Uncategorized
  • |
  • Source: www.lifesitenews.com

  • Tags: , , ,

European Committee for Social Rights upholds pro-abstinence sex education program

PJI Launches Center for Public Policy, Efforts to Reform CPS

Delaware gov. tries to preserve sports betting

Former NY AFL-CIO Leader Named Head of New York Fed

Court Rules That ‘Sexual Orientation’ Laws Include Former Homosexuals

Making Snow in the Desert: Defining a Substantial Burden under RFRA

    Making Snow in the Desert: Defining a Substantial Burden under RFRA
    Jonathan Knapp, 36 Ecology L.Q. 259 (2009)

    “Despite RFRA’s lofty goal of repairing the damage to religious liberty caused by the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Employment Division v. Smith, as the Act is purposely ambiguous concerning the meaning to be supplied to all of its critical terms, such as what types of governmental action “substantially burden” the free exercise of religion, Congress simply returned a number of intractable issues to the courts. This lack of formal guidance in RFRA has resulted in pervasive confusion over how the term “substantial burden” should be defined and analyzed, conflict between appellate courts, and ultimately, profound limitation of the statute’s success.”


  • Posted: 08/25/2009
  • |
  • Category: Religious Freedom
  • |
  • Source: www.boalt.org

  • Tags: , ,

Parental Rights and the State Regulation of Religious Schools

    Parental Rights and the State Regulation of Religious Schools
    Matthew Steilen, 2009 B.Y.U. Educ. & L.J. 269

    “In Wisconsin v. Yoder, the United States Supreme Court invalidated convictions of several Amish parents for removing their children from school in violation of state mandatory attendance laws. In reaching its decision, the Court argued that protecting the Amish parents’ decisions fit into a long-standing American tradition of giving parents control over the upbringing of their children. Yet the Supreme Court mischaracterized the history of parental rights and state interests in education. Contemporary historical research shows that parents have long ceded a large measure of control to the state in the education of their children. Still, very little has been written about this scholarship in legal journals. This article attempts to remedy this deficiency. It isolates and explores three key periods in the development of state-administered public schools, paying special attention to early public funding of religious schools, the Protestant character of the common schools, and Catholic resistance to the use of the King James Bible in common schools. In so doing, this article argues for a “republican” interpretation of early educational practices. Drawing on that interpretation, the article joins a debate between Noah Feldman, Martha Nussbaum, and others about the nature of American religious liberties, and argues that their views are not able to fully acknowledge the history of Protestant evangelizing in public schools.”


  • Posted: 08/25/2009
  • |
  • Category: Religious Freedom

  • Tags: , , , ,

Toward an Integrated Disparate Treatment and Accommodation Framework for Title VII Religion Cases

    Toward an Integrated Disparate Treatment and Accommodation Framework for Title VII Religion Cases
    Roberto L. Corrada, 77 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1411 (2009)

    “This Article explores the interrelationship between accommodation and discrimination in Title VII religion cases. This Article begins with discussion and analysis of three typical Title VII mixed disparate treatment/ accommodation cases, demonstrating how malleable and ill-defined the lines between Title VII disparate treatment and accommodation cases can be. These cases show that it is likely that a good number of Title VII religion cases straddle the two frameworks, and that some number of those cases that do straddle the line are unnecessarily pigeonholed into one framework or another.”


  • Posted: 08/25/2009
  • |
  • Category: Religious Freedom

  • Tags: , ,

Constitutionality of Home Education: How the Supreme Court and American History Endorse Parental Choice

    Constitutionality of Home Education: How the Supreme Court and American History Endorse Parental Choice
    Chad Olsen, 2009 B.Y.U. Educ. & L.J. 399

    “The year 2008 frightened many homeschooling parents. A California Court of Appeals case, In re Rachel L., appeared to close the door on many parents’ assumed right to home school their children. The court said, ‘[P]arents do not have a constitutional right to home school their children,’ and added that non-credentialed parents may not home school their children . . . Part II of this article provides the background information relevant to understanding the court’s rehearing decision in Jonathan. This includes information about Rachel and the concurrent publicity. Part III then analyzes Jonathan and its implications. Following this analysis, Part IV examines Supreme Court precedent that is relevant to home education. Next, Part V gives a historical perspective on home education in the United States.”


  • Posted: 08/25/2009
  • |
  • Category: Marriage & Family

  • Tags: , , , , ,

“The Journey to Protect Women’s Mental Health with Relevant, Truthful and Not Misleading Information in Informed Consent Abortion Statutes”