Lawsuit filed to keep bells ringing at 3 Valley churches

Kansas: Council to fight free speech suit

    Washburn University Review: “A Mulvane woman who claims the city violated her free speech rights at a city council forum will get the opportunity to make her case in federal court . . . Farnsworth contends in her lawsuit that the city censored speakers who opposed a casino project. She is being represented by the Alliance Defense Fund, a religious advocacy group based in Scottsdale, Ariz., that espouses the defense of ‘traditional family values’ and other conservative issues.”


  • Posted: 09/02/2009
  • |
  • Category: Uncategorized
  • |
  • Source: media.www.washburnreview.org

  • Tags: ,

UK: IVF kids can now have 2 mums on birth certificate

Canada: Man knifed outside strip club

263 Episcopal Clergy including 20 Bishops Endorse Pansexual Declaration

Colorado: Carbon Co. Adopts Temp Ban On Adult Business

Colombian bishops denounce 8 million dollar ‘women’s clinic’

Dance Teacher Fired for Using Religious Music in Class Goes to Trial

Conservative Christian Cause Lawyering, Pluralism, and Same Sex Marriage

    Hensley, Jonathan, Conservative Christian Cause Lawyering, Pluralism, and Same Sex Marriage (2009). APSA 2009 Toronto Meeting Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1450896

    The idea of “cause lawyering” is usually associated with liberal legal advocacy groups. However, over the last three decades, conservative cause lawyers, including those advocating conservative Christian causes, have become more active and influential. Conservative Christian legal advocacy groups have been most successful in promoting their causes when they have accepted the notion of pluralism, and taken the position that the conservative Christian viewpoint is one voice among many that must be allowed to express itself in a pluralist society. This strategy has led to successes in issue areas such as abortion protestation and church/state issues in public schools. However, the increasingly prominent issue of same-sex marriage poses a challenge for these groups.

    With gay marriage now recognized in four states, and “civil unions” or their equivalent in a few others, conflicts between religious freedom and recognition of same-sex marriage – and between competing versions of pluralism – seem likely. This paper reviews the use of pluralist arguments by Conservative Christian litigation groups, and then examines the arguments made by the same groups in several recent state supreme court cases concerning same-sex marriage. The results show that, for the most part, conservative Christian legal advocacy groups have abandoned their previous commitments to pluralism in their arguments against same-sex marriage.


  • Posted: 09/02/2009
  • |
  • Category: Marriage & Family
  • |
  • Source: ssrn.com

  • Tags: , , , ,

California: Human Trafficking Bill Passes Assembly

NY high court to consider lesbian co-parenting case

UK: Sentenced to death on the NHS

Rhode Island gov. defends speech at pro marriage event

Wuerl Ups Opposition To Marriage Redefinition: D.C. Archbishop Mobilizes Priests

3 states still ban religious clothing for teachers

Controversial U.K. Mayor Cuts Gay Pride Funding, Pledges End to Political Correctness in Government

WA: Poll finds support for same-sex domestic partnerships

Justice Stevens slows his hiring at high court

Ctr. for Security Policy: Rifqa Bary and the Noor Mosque

    Center for Security Policy: “The Center for Security Policy– along with the Florida Security Council and Nonie Darwish, bestselling author of Cruel and Usual Punishment– hosted a blogger conference call to discuss the latest developments in the plight of 17-year-old Rifqa Bary. Ms. Bary– a Muslim who converted to Christianity — fled her family in Ohio out of fear that, in accordance with what authoritative Islam calls shariah, they would take her life as punishment for leaving the Islamic faith. As was discussed on the call, this fear has been reinforced by the fact that her family’s mosque, the Noor Islamic Cultural Center, has been tied to terrorism and jihadist ideology from its inception. Ms. Bary has fled to Florida where her attorneys are trying to prevent state authorities from sending her back to her family and possibly her death. The transcript of the conference call is as follows . . . ”


  • Posted: 09/02/2009
  • |
  • Category: Religious Freedom
  • |
  • Source: www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org

  • Tags: , , ,

TIME: A Florida Culture-War Circus Over Rifqa Bary

Voters to decide the fate of marriage in Maine

UK: First baby born from new egg-screening technique

Media Ignoring Conservatives’ Return to Dominance of Political Book Market

Washington Secretary of State certifies Referendum 71; Superior Court refuses to block vote

Churches sue city of Phoenix over ordinance prohibiting ringing of church bells

Q&A On Faith Healing and the Law Posted

Justice Stevens Slows His Hiring at High Court, Fueling Retirement Speculation

Supreme Court Asked to Hear Case of the Florida Bar’s Involvement in Divisive Issues

Give us this day our daily… Catholic church issues prayer for faithful to say before sex

Canadian Human Rights Tribunal: Hate speech law unconstitutional

California Assembly passes anti-DOMA resolution

NY: With Senate astir, Paterson will delay same-sex “marriage” bill

3rd Circuit upholds internet gambling ban

Massachusetts: Industrial Park strip club zone rejected

Obama hosts dinner for Islamic holy month

Dutch to prosecute Arabs over Holocaust cartoon

Greg Baylor: Summary of the ruling in Pedreira v. Kentucky Baptist Homes for Children (6th Cir.)

    On August 31, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued a decision in Pedreira v. Kentucky Baptist Homes for Children.

    The Sixth Circuit:

    (1) affirmed the district court’s dismissal of Alicia Pedreira’s and Karen Vance’s statutory employment discrimination claims against the Home;

    (2) affirmed the district court’s ruling that the plaintiffs’ status as federal taxpayers did not give them standing to assert that the financial relationship between the Commonwealth and the Home violated the Establishment Clause;

    (3) but reversed the district court’s ruling that plaintiffs’ status as state taxpayers did not give them Establishment Clause standing.

    The Sixth Circuit’s treatment of the statutory employment discrimination claims is welcome. The Court of Appeals, like the district court, rejected the notion that a state law ban on religious discrimination in employment prohibits an employer from taking adverse action against a person because of his or her sexual orientation or conduct — even if that action is rooted in the employer’s religious convictions.


  • Posted: 09/02/2009
  • |
  • Category: Religious Freedom

  • Tags: , , , ,

Should public schools teach religion?

Viewing the Alert Email Digest in Gmail’s web interface using Firefox

    We have received a few reports from ADF Alliance Alert subscribers indicating that the content of their Email Digest version of the Alert is not displaying. Usually, this is a matter of setting security filters appropriately. However, we have discovered …


  • Posted: 09/02/2009
  • |
  • Category: ADF in the News

  • Tags:

Charter school takes legal action against Idaho over the Bible

Idaho school sues state over Bible plan

CFACT files suit to reclaim funds

Idaho school sues state over Bible plan

Video: Dr. Kevorkian talks about euthanasia in FOX interview

On the Secularization of the Public Square: Jews in France and in the United States

Francis J. Beckwith: The Federal Courts’ View of Religion and its Status as Knowledge

Shifting Toward Balance, Not Conservatism: The Court’s Interpretation of the Lemon Test’s Legislative Intent Prong and Reaction for the Electorate

    Shifting Toward Balance, Not Conservatism: The Court’s Interpretation of the Lemon Test’s Legislative Intent Prong and Reaction for the Electorate
    Kedrick N. Whitmore, 7 U. Md. L.J. Race, Religion, Gender & Class 437 (2009)

    “Christian conservatives favor the maintenance of religious symbols and practices in the government and as such were an established and practical vehicle for “defending” religion and balancing a Court seemingly bent on total secularization. The American public did not shift to the right so much as respond to the Court’s shift to the left.”


  • Posted: 09/02/2009
  • |
  • Category: Religious Freedom

  • Tags: , , ,

Religious Symbols in the Public Space: In Search of a European Answer

Just Say No?: Redefining the Foundation of Abstinence Education in the United States

    Just Say No?: Redefining the Foundation of Abstinence Education in the United States
    Farnaz Faiaz, J.D., 9 Hous. J. Health L. & Pol’y 97 (2009)

    “Finally, Part V concludes legislators will soon feel pressure to reform current federal abstinence education policies, as neither abstinence-only, nor comprehensive sex education in their current forms have conclusively reduced rates of teenage pregnancy or STIs. A new approach is needed–one that builds on current notions of comprehensive and collaborative sex education and adds outcome-based financial incentives.”


  • Posted: 09/02/2009
  • |
  • Category: Sanctity of Life

  • Tags: , , , ,

Islamic Politics and Secular Politics: Can They Co-Exist?

    Mohammad Fadel, Islamic Politics and Secular Politics: Can They Co-Exist? (August 18, 2009). Journal of Law and Religion, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1457176

    “I argue that using the resources of Islamic theological and legal tradition in support of the idea of a secular state is more likely to win traditionalist Muslim support for a secular state than Islamic arguments that rely on controversial theological propositions that are not necessarily required for at least certain kinds of secular states, e.g. a politically liberal state of the sort An-Naim calls for.”


  • Posted: 09/02/2009
  • |
  • Category: Global
  • |
  • Source: ssrn.com

  • Tags: , , ,