Washburn University Review: “A Mulvane woman who claims the city violated her free speech rights at a city council forum will get the opportunity to make her case in federal court . . . Farnsworth contends in her lawsuit that the city censored speakers who opposed a casino project. She is being represented by the Alliance Defense Fund, a religious advocacy group based in Scottsdale, Ariz., that espouses the defense of ‘traditional family values’ and other conservative issues.”
- Posted: 09/02/2009
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- |
- Source: media.www.washburnreview.org
- Tags: State: Kansas, Topic: Gambling
Hensley, Jonathan, Conservative Christian Cause Lawyering, Pluralism, and Same Sex Marriage (2009). APSA 2009 Toronto Meeting Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1450896
The idea of “cause lawyering” is usually associated with liberal legal advocacy groups. However, over the last three decades, conservative cause lawyers, including those advocating conservative Christian causes, have become more active and influential. Conservative Christian legal advocacy groups have been most successful in promoting their causes when they have accepted the notion of pluralism, and taken the position that the conservative Christian viewpoint is one voice among many that must be allowed to express itself in a pluralist society. This strategy has led to successes in issue areas such as abortion protestation and church/state issues in public schools. However, the increasingly prominent issue of same-sex marriage poses a challenge for these groups.
With gay marriage now recognized in four states, and “civil unions” or their equivalent in a few others, conflicts between religious freedom and recognition of same-sex marriage – and between competing versions of pluralism – seem likely. This paper reviews the use of pluralist arguments by Conservative Christian litigation groups, and then examines the arguments made by the same groups in several recent state supreme court cases concerning same-sex marriage. The results show that, for the most part, conservative Christian legal advocacy groups have abandoned their previous commitments to pluralism in their arguments against same-sex marriage.
- Posted: 09/02/2009
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: ssrn.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Category: Marriage and Family, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Legal Periodicals, Topic: Marriage
Center for Security Policy: “The Center for Security Policy– along with the Florida Security Council and Nonie Darwish, bestselling author of Cruel and Usual Punishment– hosted a blogger conference call to discuss the latest developments in the plight of 17-year-old Rifqa Bary. Ms. Bary– a Muslim who converted to Christianity — fled her family in Ohio out of fear that, in accordance with what authoritative Islam calls shariah, they would take her life as punishment for leaving the Islamic faith. As was discussed on the call, this fear has been reinforced by the fact that her family’s mosque, the Noor Islamic Cultural Center, has been tied to terrorism and jihadist ideology from its inception. Ms. Bary has fled to Florida where her attorneys are trying to prevent state authorities from sending her back to her family and possibly her death. The transcript of the conference call is as follows . . . ”
- Posted: 09/02/2009
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, State: Florida, Topic: Islam, Topic: Parental Rights
On August 31, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued a decision in Pedreira v. Kentucky Baptist Homes for Children.
The Sixth Circuit:
(1) affirmed the district court’s dismissal of Alicia Pedreira’s and Karen Vance’s statutory employment discrimination claims against the Home;
(2) affirmed the district court’s ruling that the plaintiffs’ status as federal taxpayers did not give them standing to assert that the financial relationship between the Commonwealth and the Home violated the Establishment Clause;
(3) but reversed the district court’s ruling that plaintiffs’ status as state taxpayers did not give them Establishment Clause standing.
The Sixth Circuit’s treatment of the statutory employment discrimination claims is welcome. The Court of Appeals, like the district court, rejected the notion that a state law ban on religious discrimination in employment prohibits an employer from taking adverse action against a person because of his or her sexual orientation or conduct — even if that action is rooted in the employer’s religious convictions.
- Posted: 09/02/2009
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- Tags: ADF: Gregory S. Baylor, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, Court: 6th Circuit, Group: Christian Legal Society
We have received a few reports from ADF Alliance Alert subscribers indicating that the content of their Email Digest version of the Alert is not displaying. Usually, this is a matter of setting security filters appropriately. However, we have discovered …
- Posted: 09/02/2009
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- Tags: ADF: Alliance Alert
Shifting Toward Balance, Not Conservatism: The Court’s Interpretation of the Lemon Test’s Legislative Intent Prong and Reaction for the Electorate
Kedrick N. Whitmore, 7 U. Md. L.J. Race, Religion, Gender & Class 437 (2009)
“Christian conservatives favor the maintenance of religious symbols and practices in the government and as such were an established and practical vehicle for “defending” religion and balancing a Court seemingly bent on total secularization. The American public did not shift to the right so much as respond to the Court’s shift to the left.”
- Posted: 09/02/2009
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Category: Religious Freedom, Court: U.S. Supreme, Topic: Legal Periodicals
Just Say No?: Redefining the Foundation of Abstinence Education in the United States
Farnaz Faiaz, J.D., 9 Hous. J. Health L. & Pol’y 97 (2009)
“Finally, Part V concludes legislators will soon feel pressure to reform current federal abstinence education policies, as neither abstinence-only, nor comprehensive sex education in their current forms have conclusively reduced rates of teenage pregnancy or STIs. A new approach is needed–one that builds on current notions of comprehensive and collaborative sex education and adds outcome-based financial incentives.”
- Posted: 09/02/2009
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- Tags: Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abstinence, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Legal Periodicals, Topic: Sex Indoctrination
Mohammad Fadel, Islamic Politics and Secular Politics: Can They Co-Exist? (August 18, 2009). Journal of Law and Religion, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1457176
“I argue that using the resources of Islamic theological and legal tradition in support of the idea of a secular state is more likely to win traditionalist Muslim support for a secular state than Islamic arguments that rely on controversial theological propositions that are not necessarily required for at least certain kinds of secular states, e.g. a politically liberal state of the sort An-Naim calls for.”
- Posted: 09/02/2009
- |
- Category: Global
- |
- Source: ssrn.com
- Tags: Category: Global, Category: Religious Freedom, Topic: Islam, Topic: Legal Periodicals
|

Latest Posts
-
www.necn.com
05/18/2012
NECN.com (AP): Democrats who control the Senate Judiciary Committee have agreed to give Gov. Chris Christie’s third nominee to the state Supreme Court a hearing, but the gay, black Republican will face difficulty being confirmed because of his lack of courtroom experience and his vow to stay out of same-sex marriage cases.
-
www.turtlebayandbeyond.org
05/18/2012
Turtle Bay and Beyond: The Secretary of Gender, Youth and Child Development in Trinidad and Tabago, Verna St Rose Greaves announced this week that she supports not only the legalization of abortion but also the promotion of gay rights.
-
www.charlotteobserver.com
05/18/2012
Charlotte Observer: Our first instinct, as opponents of North Carolina’s constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage, is to challenge it any way possible and show the harm it inflicts. So we understand those who encourage the Charlotte City Council to offer same-sex benefits to its employees – even if it gets the city sued. But council members made a smarter decision last night, voting 9-2 to get an opinion from the N.C. attorney general on the issue before including the benefits in the next fiscal year budget.

|