Judge dismisses school dress code lawsuit in SD

Washington Teachers Leave National Education Association

Steven Aden on the Jody Hice Show: Personhood Amendments

“Teen birth rates highest in most religious states”

European Parliament raps Lithuania for curbing homosexual advocacy

Fla. Episcopal Bishop to Authorize Blessing of Same-Sex Unions

50 Bright Stars: An Assessment of Each State’s Constitutional Commitment to Limited Government

    Goldwater Institute: “In an era of burgeoning federal government power, state constitutions are full of untapped potential; many provide stronger protection of individual freedoms than does the federal constitution. But realizing that potential requires recognizing its existence and assessing which state constitutions offer the best opportunities for securing the principles of limited government. To that end, this report ranks each state in the United States according to its constitutional commitment to the principles of limited government from a classical liberal perspective.”


  • Posted: 09/17/2009
  • |
  • Category: Bench & Bar
  • |
  • Source: www.goldwaterinstitute.org

  • Tags: ,

National Right to Life: “America’s Healthy Future Act” contains “massive federal subsidies” supporting abortion

    National Right to Life press release: “The bill contains provisions that would send massive federal subsidies directly to both private insurance plans and government-chartered cooperatives that pay for elective abortion. This would be a drastic break from longstanding federal policy, under which federal funds do not pay for elective abortions or subsidize health plans that cover elective abortions. For example, current law prohibits any of the over 250 private health plans that participate in the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) program from paying for elective abortions, because these plans receive federal subsidies. These private plans cover over 8 million federal employees and dependents, including members of Congress.”


  • Posted: 09/17/2009
  • |
  • Category: Sanctity of Life
  • |
  • Source: www.nrlc.org

  • Tags: , , , ,

House votes to defund ACORN

ACLU And Coalition Ask Justice Department To Withdraw Religious Discrimination Opinion

Notre Dame’s Father Jenkins Begins Pro-Life Measures at University, but Still not Dropping Charges against Pro-Life Protestors

Second Abortion Increases Risk of Premature Babies 93%: Canadian Study

Controversy Continues Over Law Prof’s “Anti-Gay” Ad

The Nature of Academic Freedom is Central to the Controversy at Boston College Law School

Teacher Awarded Qualified Immunity In Suit For Remark Against Creationism

Do Government Economic Incentives Trigger Church-State Limits For Grocery? St. Louis debates crucifix

More child porn found in Wash. sex offender center

Cal. Court Says Congregation Cannot Disaffiliate From National Church Body

RNC Chairman says pro-abortion candidates are OK

3rd Circuit Extends Civil Rights Protection to Independent Contractors

Judge rules Mulvane violated free-speech rights

Judge rules Mulvane violated free-speech rights

“Gay GOPer has star role in same-sex marriage fight”

Boy in a Bikini, Other Gay Films Get Wide Audience in California Schools

Court: City council violated rights of Kansas woman muzzled at public hearing

Some 750,000 pedophiles prowling Internet: UN

Love Thy Neighbor: Should Religious Accommodations that Negatively Affect Coworkers’ Shift Preferences Constitute an Undue Hardship on the Employer Under Title VII?

    Rachel M. Birnbach, Love Thy Neighbor: Should Religious Accommodations that Negatively Affect Coworkers’ Shift Preferences Constitute an Undue Hardship on the Employer Under Title VII? (September 13, 2009). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1472698

    “This Note argues against those courts that have found that imposing on shift preferences of coworkers, outside the context of a collective bargaining agreement, amounts to preferential treatment. It asserts that protecting the mere shift preferences of other workers effectively reduces the duty to accommodate to a level far below what Congress could have intended when it included the duty to accommodate religious employees under Title VII. The Note concludes that preferential treatment of the religious employee exists only when imposition on the coworkers creates an economic burden on the employer or would require coworkers to take on additional physically dangerous tasks.”


  • Posted: 09/17/2009
  • |
  • Category: Religious Freedom
  • |
  • Source: ssrn.com

  • Tags: ,

Religious Pluralism Versus Social Cohesion? Normative Fault Lines of Human Rights Jurisprudence in Europe

Celebrating the Differences that Could Make a Difference: United States v. Virginia and a New Vision of Sexual Equality

    Courtney M. Cahill, Celebrating the Differences that Could Make a Difference: United States v. Virginia and a New Vision of Sexual Equality (September 15, 2009). Ohio State Law Journal, Forthcoming ; Roger Williams Univ. Legal Studies Paper No. 82. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1474050

    “This Essay contends that Ginsburg’s celebration of difference in Virginia could, and indeed should, be a model for gay rights advocacy, and perhaps in time for a gay rights jurisprudence. Where that advocacy has remained stubbornly tethered to a no-differences paradigm, one that insists on a one-to-one correspondence between gays and straights notwithstanding the reality of difference that exists between those two groups, their intimate pairings, and the families, if any, that they share, Ginsburg’s celebration of gender difference both in and beyond Virginia cogently demonstrates that difference need not defeat, nor be an impediment to, equality claims in our constitutional order.”


  • Posted: 09/17/2009
  • |
  • Category: Marriage & Family
  • |
  • Source: ssrn.com

  • Tags: , , , , , ,