Knoxville News Sentinel: “‘We are disappointed in the verdict,’ Kellum said. ‘We wanted a policy change, or a court ruling, and we still do not have either. We are still very much concerned that at any point in time, a school administrator can step in and say, “You can’t do that.”‘”
- Posted: 10/30/2009
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.knoxnews.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Nate Kellum, Category: Religious Freedom, State: Tennessee, Topic: Education, ZZ: Whitson v Knox County Board of Education
We have had some technical difficulties with the ADF Alliance Alert web server during the course of an upgrade. We are working to resolve those and apologize for any periodic outages and inconvenience. Thank you.
- Posted: 10/30/2009
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
Reuters: “Demand remains strongest in urban areas – and as a result, charter “market
share” is growing rapidly in cities and adjacent suburbs, even while the overall number of students remains a modest portion of nationwide enrollment. ‘Charter schools are working at scale in a growing number of American cities,’ according to Nelson Smith, President and CEO of the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. ‘Chartering is becoming well-established as a key component of the public education delivery system,’ he added.” The report includes charter school statistics for various cities around the country.
- Posted: 10/29/2009
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: www.reuters.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Topic: Education, Topic: School Choice
Academic Freedom File: “On Tuesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard oral arguments in Roman Catholic Foundation, UW-Madison, Inc. et al. v. David G. Walsh, et al., a case involving the viewpoint discriminatory allocation of student activity fees at the University of Wisconsin-Madison . . . ADF Senior Vice President and Senior Counsel Jordan Lorence argued the case on behalf of the student group.”
- Posted: 10/29/2009
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- |
- Source: speakupmovement.wordpress.com
- Tags: ADF: Center for Academic Freedom, ADF: David French, ADF: David Hacker, ADF: Jordan Lorence, ADF: Media Clips, Category: Religious Freedom, State: Wisconsin, Topic: Education, ZZ: Case Filings, ZZ: Roman Catholic Foundation v Walsh
David French, Director of the ADF Center for Academic Freedom, writing at National Review’s Phi Beta Cons blog: “It is becoming increasingly common for universities to defend unconstitutional policies (sometimes for years), make changes at the last possible moment, and then seek dismissal of a case. Just last week, ADF Center for Academic Freedom attorneys argued a case against Arizona State University (retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor presided) in which the university changed its policies (for the second time) after ASU Students for Life filed their appellate brief and now seek dismissal for mootness.”
- Posted: 10/29/2009
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: phibetacons.nationalreview.com
- Tags: ADF: Center for Academic Freedom, ADF: David French, ADF: Media Clips, Category: Religious Freedom, Court: 11th Circuit, State: Arizona, State: Florida, Topic: Education, ZZ: ASU Students for Life v Crow
Metro Weekly: “Cleta Mitchell, an attorney representing Stand4MarriageDC, with which Jackson and the National Organization for Marriage are affiliated, and Austin R. Nimocks, a local attorney for the Alliance Defense Fund, an Arizona-based, ‘Christ-Centered’ legal group, and Jackson got the ball rolling Monday morning at One Judiciary Square.”
- Posted: 10/29/2009
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- |
- Source: www.metroweekly.com
- Tags: ADF: Austin R. Nimocks, ADF: Media Clips, Category: Marriage and Family, Group: Human Rights Campaign (HRC), Topic: District of Columbia, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage
Washington Times: “‘Bills of this sort are designed to forward a political agenda and silence critics, not combat actual crime,’ said Erik Stanley, senior counsel at the Alliance Defense Fund, a Christian advocacy group.”
- Posted: 10/29/2009
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- |
- Source: washingtontimes.com
- Tags: ADF: Erik Stanley, ADF: Media Clips, Category: Religious Freedom, Group: Human Rights Campaign (HRC), Topic: Federal DOMA, Topic: Hate Crimes, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: White House
Baptist Press: “‘All violent crimes are hate crimes, and all crime victims deserve equal justice,’ ADF Senior Legal Counsel Erik Stanley said in a written statement. ‘This law is a grave threat to the First Amendment because it provides special penalties based on what people think, feel, or believe.’”
- Posted: 10/29/2009
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- |
- Source: www.sbcbaptistpress.org
- Tags: ADF: Erik Stanley, ADF: Media Clips, Category: Religious Freedom, Group: Southern Baptist Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, Topic: Hate Crimes, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Legislation, Topic: White House
Associated Baptist Press: “‘This law is a grave threat to the First Amendment because it provides special penalties based on what people think, feel, or believe.’ said Erik Stanley, senior counsel for the conservative Christian legal group Alliance Defense Fund, in a press release.”
- Posted: 10/29/2009
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- |
- Source: www.abpnews.com
- Tags: ADF: Erik Stanley, ADF: Media Clips, Category: Religious Freedom, Group: Human Rights Campaign (HRC), Topic: Hate Crimes, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Legislation, Topic: White House
WorldNetDaily: “‘All violent crimes are hate crimes, and all crime victims deserve equal justice,’ ADF Senior Legal Counsel Erik Stanley said in a statement. ‘This law is a grave threat to the First Amendment because it provides special penalties based on what people think, feel, or believe. ADF will be on the front line to defend those whose free speech or free exercise of religion rights are violated by this unconstitutional law and to ultimately overturn this attack on freedom.’”
- Posted: 10/29/2009
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.wnd.com
- Tags: ADF: Erik Stanley, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, Group: American Family Association (AFA), Group: Liberty Counsel, Group: Pacific Justice Institute, Topic: Hate Crimes, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Legislation, Topic: White House
Marci A. Hamilton writes at Findlaw: “Islamic countries recently have been pushing the United Nations to adopt a resolution that would make ‘religious defamation’ a civil rights violation. Their theory is that it should be a human rights crime for anyone to speak negatively about a religion. Their aim is to bring the world community to their side in condemning the public criticism of Islamicism in any and every context, including that of political cartoons. Their latest gambit has been to introduce a UN resolution against religious defamation. Instead of stoutly and loudly rejecting such a dangerous principle, as it should have done, the Obama Administration joined Egypt in crafting a misguided compromise resolution. The new Resolution, unfortunately, was adopted unanimously.”
- Posted: 10/29/2009
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: writ.lp.findlaw.com
- Tags: Category: Global, Category: Religious Freedom, Topic: Islam, Topic: United Nations, Topic: White House
|
Latest Posts
-
hosted.ap.org
02/09/2012
News from The Associated Press: The Virginia state Senate passed legislation Thursday allowing private adoption agencies to deny placements that conflict with their religious or moral beliefs, including opposition to homosexuality.
-
www.lifenews.com
02/09/2012
LifeNews.com: The liberal women on The View, Wednesday, shrieked at the “totalitarian” decision by a Texas judge to uphold a law requiring women to look at an ultrasound before having an abortion.
-
balkin.blogspot.com
02/09/2012
Jason Mazzone at Balkinization: By finding Proposition 8 to violate the Equal Protection Clause solely on the ground that it withdrew the right of marriage that gays and lesbians previously possessed in California (as a result the earlier state supreme court’s decision), Perry v. Brown produces a curious result. It appears to leave Proposition 8 partially intact.

|