The opinion in River of Life Kingdom Ministries v. Village of Hazel Crest, No. 08-2819 (7th Cir., Oct. 27, 2009) begins:
Before CUDAHY, MANION, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. River of Life Kingdom Ministries (“the Church”) attempted to relocate its congregation from a crowded warehouse in Chicago Heights to its very own property—a dated fixer-upper in a blighted community in the Village of Hazel Crest. The problem was the Village had a zoning ordinance in place that designated the area a “Service Business District.” The ordinance permitted a number of commercial uses for the property, but not religious services. The Church was aware of this ordinance, but it bought the property anyway hoping it would receive a special use permit, a form of relief, which, unbeknownst to the Church, was no longer available under the current zoning ordinance.
So the Church sued the Village under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”) to allow it to relocate to the business district. Before the case could be decided on the merits, the Church filed a motion for preliminary injunction to allow it to relocate to the property in the interim. The district court denied the motion and the Church appealed.
We conclude that the Church has only a slim chance of success on the merits and that any irreparable harm it may suffer does not significantly outweigh the potential harm to the Village. As a result, we affirm the district court’s denial of the Church’s motion for preliminary injunction.
- Posted: 10/27/2009
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: www.ca7.uscourts.gov
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, Court: 7th Circuit, State: Illinois, Topic: RLUIPA, ZZ: River of Life Kingdom Ministries v Village of Hazel Crest
Washington Post: “But many Afghans, he [Matthew Hoh] wrote in his resignation letter, are fighting the United States largely because its troops are there — a growing military presence in villages and valleys where outsiders, including other Afghans, are not welcome and where the corrupt, U.S.-backed national government is rejected. While the Taliban is a malign presence, and Pakistan-based al-Qaeda needs to be confronted, he said, the United States is asking its troops to die in Afghanistan for what is essentially a far-off civil war.”
- Posted: 10/27/2009
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: www.washingtonpost.com
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: Afghanistan, Topic: Military
The Hill: “The GOP could lose its fifth of five big special elections in two years — a development that has Republicans asking why the irregular races continue to bedevil their party, even as it rebounds in other ways. Some say Republicans haven’t learned from their losses in three conservative districts last year, nor from an upstate New York special election in March. ”
- Posted: 10/27/2009
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: thehill.com
- Tags: State: New York, Topic: Politics
David French, Director of the ADF Center for Academic Freedom, writing at Phi Beta Cons: “As I type this post, my colleagues at the Alliance Defense Fund Center for Academic Freedom are arguing a critical case before the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago. The subject: the use and abuse of mandatory student activity fees at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.”
- Posted: 10/27/2009
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: phibetacons.nationalreview.com
- Tags: ADF: Center for Academic Freedom, ADF: David French, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, Court: 7th Circuit, State: Wisconsin, Topic: Education, ZZ: Roman Catholic Foundation v Walsh
Christianity Today: “In mid-July, New Hampshire judge Lucinda Sadler ordered 10-year-old Amanda Kurowski into public instruction . . . ‘I think it’s widely regarded as a dangerous precedent if it’s allowed to stand,’ said [Mike] Johnson, whose group represents Kurowski’s mother. ‘We don’t want courts to be in the business of comparative theology.’”
- Posted: 10/27/2009
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.christianitytoday.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Mike Johnson, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, Group: American Bar Association (ABA), State: New Hampshire, State: Ohio, Topic: Divorce, Topic: Education, Topic: Home School, Topic: Parental Rights, Topic: School Choice
Lynn D. Wardle, Restructuring Democracy or Lawlessness? Critical Reflections on in Re Marriage Cases (May 1, 2009). Nexus Journal, Vol. 14, p. 91, 2008-2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1440336
“This essay will review why that decision is more serious than judicial legislation. Then it will explain why that decision exceeded the competence of the court, and why the opinion was fatally flawed in form as well as substance. The magnitude of the victory of passage of Prop 8 is reviewed, and the role of the court as an agent of the people, not their master, in interpreting the constitution is discussed. Finally, the connection between judicial lawlessness in assuming to create new constitutional rights and mob lawlessness is briefly considered in the conclusion.”
- Posted: 10/27/2009
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: ssrn.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Legal Periodicals, Topic: Marriage
Same-sex “marriage” and religious liberty: Life after Prop 8
Robin Fretwell Wilson, 14 Nexus: Chap. J. L. & Pol’y 101 (2009)
“This Essay argues that the moral clashes over same-sex relationships certainly exist but are not resolved by Prop 8–far from it. Tensions over same-sex relationships have erupted across the world and the United States as more and more governments have recognized not just same-sex marriage but civil unions and same-sex adoptions. Regardless of how the California Supreme Court rules on the challenges to Prop 8 now before it, California still allows civil unions and same-sex adoption and bans discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in places of public accommodation.”
- Posted: 10/27/2009
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Freedom, Topic: Adoption, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Legal Periodicals, Topic: Marriage
The Bush Administration’s Midnight Refusal Rule: Upsetting the Emerging Balance in State Pharmacist Refusal Laws
Jane W. Walker, 46 Hous. L. Rev. 939 (2009)
“Termed ‘conscience’ or ‘refusal’ laws, proponents argue that without them, employers and state medical boards may discriminate against religious pharmacists. In support of their argument, proponents point to the traditions of protecting religious freedom and personal autonomy in the United States. By contrast, opponents are outraged that such laws permit a pharmacist to interfere with a patient’s autonomy rights, as well as her constitutionally protected right to contraception. At its core, the debate pits two seemingly equal sets of rights against one another–the pharmacist’s autonomy and religious rights versus the patient’s autonomy and reproductive rights.”
- Posted: 10/27/2009
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Legal Periodicals
|

Latest Posts
-
www.necn.com
05/18/2012
NECN.com (AP): Democrats who control the Senate Judiciary Committee have agreed to give Gov. Chris Christie’s third nominee to the state Supreme Court a hearing, but the gay, black Republican will face difficulty being confirmed because of his lack of courtroom experience and his vow to stay out of same-sex marriage cases.
-
www.turtlebayandbeyond.org
05/18/2012
Turtle Bay and Beyond: The Secretary of Gender, Youth and Child Development in Trinidad and Tabago, Verna St Rose Greaves announced this week that she supports not only the legalization of abortion but also the promotion of gay rights.
-
www.charlotteobserver.com
05/18/2012
Charlotte Observer: Our first instinct, as opponents of North Carolina’s constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage, is to challenge it any way possible and show the harm it inflicts. So we understand those who encourage the Charlotte City Council to offer same-sex benefits to its employees – even if it gets the city sued. But council members made a smarter decision last night, voting 9-2 to get an opinion from the N.C. attorney general on the issue before including the benefits in the next fiscal year budget.

|