7th Circuit upholds denial of preliminary injunction in Illinois church’s RLUIPA zoning challenge

    The opinion in River of Life Kingdom Ministries v. Village of Hazel Crest, No. 08-2819 (7th Cir., Oct. 27, 2009) begins:

    Before CUDAHY, MANION, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. River of Life Kingdom Ministries (“the Church”) attempted to relocate its congregation from a crowded warehouse in Chicago Heights to its very own property—a dated fixer-upper in a blighted community in the Village of Hazel Crest. The problem was the Village had a zoning ordinance in place that designated the area a “Service Business District.” The ordinance permitted a number of commercial uses for the property, but not religious services. The Church was aware of this ordinance, but it bought the property anyway hoping it would receive a special use permit, a form of relief, which, unbeknownst to the Church, was no longer available under the current zoning ordinance.

    So the Church sued the Village under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”) to allow it to relocate to the business district. Before the case could be decided on the merits, the Church filed a motion for preliminary injunction to allow it to relocate to the property in the interim. The district court denied the motion and the Church appealed.

    We conclude that the Church has only a slim chance of success on the merits and that any irreparable harm it may suffer does not significantly outweigh the potential harm to the Village. As a result, we affirm the district court’s denial of the Church’s motion for preliminary injunction.


  • Posted: 10/27/2009
  • |
  • Category: Religious Freedom
  • |
  • Source: www.ca7.uscourts.gov

  • Tags: , , , ,

Google CEO: Internet to be dominated by Chinese language in 5 years

Judge dismisses lawsuit challenging stem cell rule

Same-sex ‘marriage’ debate distracts government from ‘real social problems,’ Mexican lawyers say

Historical Documents Display in Madison County, Georgia

11th Cir. appeals panel dismisses Fla. Christian frat case

ERLC’s Land Submits Testimony Against D.C. Same-Sex Marriage Bill

Scalia: Some on court inventing rights

“More immigrants cite sexual orientation for asylum”

Aborted Fetal Material Used in Anti-Wrinkle Creams

NYT: “Does Policy Trail Public Opinion on Gay Rights?”

Maine gov urges residents to support redefinition of marriage

Showdown: Democrat Rep. Stupak Locked in Dead Heat with House Leadership over Pro-Life Health Amendment

    LifeSiteNews: “As House Speaker Nancy Pelosi aims to seal the abortion-expanding health care bill in an early November vote, pro-life lawmakers, led by Democratic Rep. Bart Stupak of Michigan, are locked in a dead heat race for votes with Democratic leadership. According to Stupak, the Democratic leadership intends to keep a stranglehold on any pro-life amendment effort, which they acknowledge would likely otherwise succeed.”


  • Posted: 10/27/2009
  • |
  • Category: Sanctity of Life
  • |
  • Source: www.lifesitenews.com

  • Tags: , ,

Media Spins ‘Pentagon’ Support for ‘Gays’ in the Military

“Discharging Gays from Military No Threat to National Security, Report Details”

Proposed Texas Disciplinary Rule Changes Target Conflicts, Scienter, Sex

Austin R. Nimocks and Tim Tracy on the Don Kroah Show: Update on the Marriage battle in Congress and DC

U.S. official resigns over Afghan war

    Washington Post: “But many Afghans, he [Matthew Hoh] wrote in his resignation letter, are fighting the United States largely because its troops are there — a growing military presence in villages and valleys where outsiders, including other Afghans, are not welcome and where the corrupt, U.S.-backed national government is rejected. While the Taliban is a malign presence, and Pakistan-based al-Qaeda needs to be confronted, he said, the United States is asking its troops to die in Afghanistan for what is essentially a far-off civil war.”


  • Posted: 10/27/2009
  • |
  • Category: Miscellaneous
  • |
  • Source: www.washingtonpost.com

  • Tags: , ,

Family Council calls on WVU Law to allow rebuttal of radical pro-abortionist

High School Football Fans Fill Stands With Biblical Verses

Malta Court Interprets Ban On Vilifying Catholic Church

Rhode Island legislators may criminalize indoor prostitution

License Revocation Over Doctor’s Affair With His Patient Is Upheld

Both Sides Appeal Suit Against History Teacher For Anti-Religious Remarks

Sen. Arlen Specter: Time to Repeal DOMA and DADT

Dismal special election record could hamper Republicans’ 2010 comeback

    The Hill: “The GOP could lose its fifth of five big special elections in two years — a development that has Republicans asking why the irregular races continue to bedevil their party, even as it rebounds in other ways. Some say Republicans haven’t learned from their losses in three conservative districts last year, nor from an upstate New York special election in March. ”


  • Posted: 10/27/2009
  • |
  • Category: Miscellaneous
  • |
  • Source: thehill.com

  • Tags: ,

David French: A big day for free speech and legal equality on campus

Church of Scientology convicted of fraud in France

‘Net neutrality’ now on FCC’s plate

Family Diversity and Political Freedom

    The Ruth Institute Blog carries this speech by Pat Fagan of the Family Research Council at the World Congress of Families. It begins: “SUMMARY The ‘monogamous’ and the ‘polyamorous’ cultures have totally different approaches to life, with religious worship and monogamous marriage being the defining differences in their different approaches to the sexual act. Coexistence necessitates that the differences be observed by giving parents of both cultures control over the programs that cause conflict: education, adolescent health and sex education. Monogamous men need to act to obtain this for the sake of their own children.”


  • Posted: 10/27/2009
  • |
  • Category: Marriage & Family
  • |
  • Source: www.ruthblog.org

  • Tags: , ,

Tenn. Appeals Court rules for Bible Park rezoning

Thomas Sowell: Dismantling America

Arizona AG looks at private school scholarship groups

Obama to sign “hate crimes” bill Wednesday

Colombia’s AG asks court to overturn decision requiring schools to teach abortion is a “right”

DC Council hears from public about same-sex “marriage” bill

“D.C. rally calls for citywide vote on ‘gay marriage’”

Germany constitutional court rules same-sex partners have pension rights

Religious differences are making custody disputes even messier

Mass. man says Brazilian husband denied US asylum

MS: AG’s office targets domestic violence, child pornography

Announcement of Calvin College board’s stand on homosexuality, same-sex marriage expected soon

Money Talks to Have Before Marriage

Czech court delays verdict on Lisbon Treaty

Princeton: “LGBT students praise gender-neutral housing program”

Survey says: Women lag far behind as rainmakers

ADF sues Milwaukee to halt harassment of pro-life advocates

“Dallas executive amassing a gay media mini-empire”

Philippines: Davao Norte capitol recognizes “gay rights”

Panel urges ending UCMJ’s sodomy ban

Arizona may end takeover of polygamist area school district

Activists press for homosexual “rights” to be included in immigration reform

Nevada: Parents attempt to stop two “gay-themed” plays at school

TX: Jury selection begins in first polygamist trial

MI: Corunna School Board removes display on homosexuality

Victim of state law says federal “hate crimes” law the “most dangerous piece of legislation”

WA: Man gets 18 months for urging immigrants to claim homosexuality in asylum petitions

Wisconsin: Bill would change rules for “sex education”

Lynn D. Wardle: “Restructuring Democracy or Lawlessness? Critical Reflections on in Re Marriage Cases”

    Lynn D. Wardle, Restructuring Democracy or Lawlessness? Critical Reflections on in Re Marriage Cases (May 1, 2009). Nexus Journal, Vol. 14, p. 91, 2008-2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1440336

    “This essay will review why that decision is more serious than judicial legislation. Then it will explain why that decision exceeded the competence of the court, and why the opinion was fatally flawed in form as well as substance. The magnitude of the victory of passage of Prop 8 is reviewed, and the role of the court as an agent of the people, not their master, in interpreting the constitution is discussed. Finally, the connection between judicial lawlessness in assuming to create new constitutional rights and mob lawlessness is briefly considered in the conclusion.”


  • Posted: 10/27/2009
  • |
  • Category: Marriage & Family
  • |
  • Source: ssrn.com

  • Tags: , , ,

Same-sex “marriage” and religious liberty: Life after Prop 8

    Same-sex “marriage” and religious liberty: Life after Prop 8
    Robin Fretwell Wilson, 14 Nexus: Chap. J. L. & Pol’y 101 (2009)

    “This Essay argues that the moral clashes over same-sex relationships certainly exist but are not resolved by Prop 8–far from it. Tensions over same-sex relationships have erupted across the world and the United States as more and more governments have recognized not just same-sex marriage but civil unions and same-sex adoptions. Regardless of how the California Supreme Court rules on the challenges to Prop 8 now before it, California still allows civil unions and same-sex adoption and bans discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in places of public accommodation.”


  • Posted: 10/27/2009
  • |
  • Category: Religious Freedom

  • Tags: , , , , ,

“The Bush Administration’s Midnight Refusal Rule: Upsetting the Emerging Balance in State Pharmacist Refusal Laws”

    The Bush Administration’s Midnight Refusal Rule: Upsetting the Emerging Balance in State Pharmacist Refusal Laws
    Jane W. Walker, 46 Hous. L. Rev. 939 (2009)

    “Termed ‘conscience’ or ‘refusal’ laws, proponents argue that without them, employers and state medical boards may discriminate against religious pharmacists. In support of their argument, proponents point to the traditions of protecting religious freedom and personal autonomy in the United States. By contrast, opponents are outraged that such laws permit a pharmacist to interfere with a patient’s autonomy rights, as well as her constitutionally protected right to contraception. At its core, the debate pits two seemingly equal sets of rights against one another–the pharmacist’s autonomy and religious rights versus the patient’s autonomy and reproductive rights.”


  • Posted: 10/27/2009
  • |
  • Category: Religious Freedom

  • Tags: , , ,