Maine churches and the IRS–what is a political campaign?

Poll: Virginia’s opinion on K-12 education and school choice

Is there a constitutional right to sign a petition anonymously?

Our Constitutional Moment

    James Taranto writes at the Wall Street Journal: “Why? Because, he says, ‘America is in what I call a constitutional moment.’ Mr. Obama’s efforts to expand government power raise basic questions about the constitutional limits of that power. ‘The enumerated-powers argument is enormous,’ Mr. Lipsky says. ‘It’s just enormous, the ground that is open for contest here. . . . Right now, we’re at a moment where we’re not going to be able to turn to either the Congress or the executive branch for help on this.’ He believes ‘the only defense now, the only tool we have now, is the Constitution. That’s why I call it a constitutional moment, as opposed to a political moment.’ That makes it an auspicious moment for Mr. Lipsky’s new book, ‘The Citizen’s Constitution: An Annotated Guide‘. . . ”


  • Posted: 11/16/2009
  • |
  • Category: Bench & Bar
  • |
  • Source: online.wsj.com

  • Tags: , , ,

Muslims attack Christian worship service in Uganda

Homosexual Adoption Review Requested

John W. Whitehead Calls For Sweeping Changes To The U.S. Supreme Court And Far-Reaching Revisions To The Confirmation Process

Blackstone Fellow wins 2009 Child Advocate of the Year Award

ACLU: Bibles passed out, prayer encouraged in Cheatham County schools

MD: Orthodox medics, ACLU challenge religious discrimination at Pikesville Fire Company

    ACLU Press Release: “Three Orthodox medics assert in discrimination charges filed with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, that the Pikesville Volunteer Fire Company (PVFC) has illegally barred them from riding on calls, in violation of their religious rights and in retaliation for their involvement in an Orthodox emergency response organization. The medics – Dr. Matthias Goldstein, Brennan Gross, and Avrohom Green – were told last winter that because of their refusal to shave their beards on religious grounds, they could not ride with the company as medics.”


  • Posted: 11/16/2009
  • |
  • Category: Religious Freedom
  • |
  • Source: www.aclu.org

  • Tags: , ,

Supreme Court: Miami school can ban book on Cuba

Britain’s Top Religious Rights Barrister Warns United States Not to Discriminate Against Christians — in Speech on Capitol Hill

“California gay marriage campaign kicks off”

CWA: “A Vote for David Hamilton is a Vote Against Religious Freedom”

Maine churches threatened with IRS complaints for marriage support

Netherlands: Suicide tips for just 17.50 euros

Interview: Former “Gay” Youth Leader Re-Emerges to Tell His Dramatic Conversion Story

    LifeSiteNews: “‘The fury that comes from “gay” people against people like me can be vicious and vile, and it can hurt,’ he told LSN. ‘They stop at nothing to make me feel ashamed for my current stance on homosexuality, and to try to make me doubt what I have experienced in my life.’”


  • Posted: 11/16/2009
  • |
  • Category: Miscellaneous
  • |
  • Source: www.lifesitenews.com

  • Tags:

Poland Comes to Italy’s Defense on the Crucifix

Case Against Alleged Fort Hood Shooter to Test Military Justice System

French Judge Finds Hospital Guilty of “Unreasonable Obstinacy” in Saving Newborn’s Life

Spanish Bishop Says Catholic Politicians Who Vote for Abortion Excommunicate Themselves

“Guns, God and Gays: Public Opinion on Gun Rights, Abortion and Same-Sex Marriage”

Reinhardt Reversed for Third Time in Same Case

    Orin Kerr writes at the Volokh Conspiracy: “The basic dynamic of Ninth Circuit ‘liberal lion’ Stephen Reinhardt overturning a death sentence in a habeas case – and then the U.S. Supreme Court reversing Reinhardt — happens so often that it normally would not merit comment. But here’s a slight twist: Today the Supreme Court reversed Reinhardt for the third time in the same case, that of Fernando Belmontes, Jr.”


  • Posted: 11/16/2009
  • |
  • Category: Bench & Bar
  • |
  • Source: volokh.com

  • Tags: , ,

Islamic Nations Seek Legally Binding Way to Counter Religious ‘Defamation’

Napolitano Announces Obama Administration Plan to Give Amnesty to Illegal Aliens

Sexually spread diseases up, better testing cited

‘Twas the night before Christmas, and all through the court …

Conservatives split over filibuster of Obama court pick

Court turns down student over religious speech

NC: Commissioners’ prayer leads to federal court

ADF pushes for 14th Ft. Hood victim

Maine churches need not fear IRS

Law signed extending “hate crime” protections

Sacramento College student body president back after pro-life display fight

Forsyth County: Costly prayer

NH group holding summit on conservative issues

Churches win in equal access debate

“Gay marriage supporters threaten to strip churches of tax exemption”

“Washington Blade, the nation’s oldest LGBT paper ceases publication”

“The time is now for the New Jersey Legislature to act on gay marriage”

Rees Lloyd: End ACLU’s assault on memorials

Arizona may sue tuition groups for money

Senator Orrin Hatch Responds to Professor Carl Tobias on Judicial Nominations

    Findlaw: “Professor Carl Tobias recently argued that Senate Republicans are keeping President Obama from appointing federal judges. He is wrong on both his facts and his conclusions. As a reminder, the Democratic majority is 60-40 in the Senate and 12-7 on the Judiciary Committee. This is their largest majority in more than 30 years. It is time for Democrats and their defenders to stop making excuses and trying to blame everyone else. Those who want to achieve power, and who have been given power by the American people, should take responsibility for their own political actions.”


  • Posted: 11/16/2009
  • |
  • Category: Bench & Bar
  • |
  • Source: writ.lp.findlaw.com

  • Tags: ,

Evolution’s classroom crisis

    Riazat Butt writes at The Guardian: “To people wondering why creationism was getting any kind of platform, Anglican priest Michael Roberts offers a reminder. Creationism is totally untrue. It exposes people of the book – many of whom, among them distinguished speakers at this conference, see no contradiction between evolutionary theory and their faith – to ridicule. And if it gains traction with governments or other authorities, then the public practice of science and research will be hindered.”


  • Posted: 11/16/2009
  • |
  • Category: Global
  • |
  • Source: www.guardian.co.uk

  • Tags: , , ,

Robertson’s remarks put McDonnell in a bind

    Washington Post: “Virginia Muslims are calling on McDonnell (R) to disavow comments made by the Virginia Beach religious broadcaster last week in response to the shootings at Fort Hood, Tex., in which Robertson asserted that Islam is ‘not a religion’ but a ‘violent political system’ and that those who practice it should be treated like members of a communist or fascist party.”


  • Posted: 11/16/2009
  • |
  • Category: Miscellaneous
  • |
  • Source: www.washingtonpost.com

  • Tags: , ,

“FFRF charges school district discriminates against atheists, gays, and more”

Wisconsin: School chastised for ‘prayer vigil’

Obama Backers Fear Opportunities to Reshape Judiciary Are Slipping Away

Steven H. Aden: “The Fourteenth Victim”

Taking Values Seriously: Towards a Philosophy of EU Law

    Andrew Trevor Williams, Taking Values Seriously: Towards a Philosophy of EU Law (November 11, 2009). Warwick School of Law Research. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1504067

    “This article argues that the existing philosophy of EU law, such as it may be perceived, is flawed. Through a series of propositions it claims that EU law is infected by an underlying indeterminacy of ideal that has deeply affected the appreciation and realisation of stated values. These values, the most fundamental of which appear in Article 6(1) of the Treaty of European Union, have been applied in a haphazard fashion and without an understanding of normative content. The European Court of Justice has instead adopted a largely pragmatic approach that has focused on principles or virtues of governance rather than attempting to offer a way of satisfactorily defining values or ensuring their realisation. The underlying philosophy thus appears to be based on a theory of interpretation (of original political will) rather than a theory of justice. The recent decision in Kadi paradoxically offers both confirmation of the argument presented but also a judicial appreciation that a new direction may be desirable, one inspired by a law based on the predominance of fundamental values with particular emphasis on respect for fundamental rights.”


  • Posted: 11/16/2009
  • |
  • Category: Global
  • |
  • Source: ssrn.com

  • Tags: , , , ,

Moral Authority in English and American Abortion Law

    Joanna Erdman, Moral Authority in English and American Abortion Law (2009). CONSTITUTING EQUALITY: GENDER EQUALITY AND COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, Susan H. Williams, ed., pp. 107-132, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1499324

    “This chapter uses the contrast and rejection of American authorities in Axon to expose a fundamental characteristic underlying the English constitutional approach to young women’s abortion care. It is a shared rather than contrasted characteristic in American and English law. The characteristic is moral authority, defined as the legal authority to protect a state interest in prenatal life through moral abortion decision-making. Both American and English abortion law seek to protect a state interest in prenatal life by entrusting decision-making about young women’s abortion care to third parties: the family, the court, and the medical profession. Neither constitutional approach vests moral authority in young women themselves.”


  • Posted: 11/16/2009
  • |
  • Category: Global
  • |
  • Source: ssrn.com

  • Tags: , , , ,