James Taranto writes at the Wall Street Journal: “Why? Because, he says, ‘America is in what I call a constitutional moment.’ Mr. Obama’s efforts to expand government power raise basic questions about the constitutional limits of that power. ‘The enumerated-powers argument is enormous,’ Mr. Lipsky says. ‘It’s just enormous, the ground that is open for contest here. . . . Right now, we’re at a moment where we’re not going to be able to turn to either the Congress or the executive branch for help on this.’ He believes ‘the only defense now, the only tool we have now, is the Constitution. That’s why I call it a constitutional moment, as opposed to a political moment.’ That makes it an auspicious moment for Mr. Lipsky’s new book, ‘The Citizen’s Constitution: An Annotated Guide‘. . . ”
- Posted: 11/16/2009
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: online.wsj.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Court: U.S. Supreme, Topic: Insurance, Topic: White House
ACLU Press Release: “Three Orthodox medics assert in discrimination charges filed with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, that the Pikesville Volunteer Fire Company (PVFC) has illegally barred them from riding on calls, in violation of their religious rights and in retaliation for their involvement in an Orthodox emergency response organization. The medics – Dr. Matthias Goldstein, Brennan Gross, and Avrohom Green – were told last winter that because of their refusal to shave their beards on religious grounds, they could not ride with the company as medics.”
- Posted: 11/16/2009
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: www.aclu.org
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, State: Maryland, Topic: Title VII
LifeSiteNews: “‘The fury that comes from “gay” people against people like me can be vicious and vile, and it can hurt,’ he told LSN. ‘They stop at nothing to make me feel ashamed for my current stance on homosexuality, and to try to make me doubt what I have experienced in my life.’”
- Posted: 11/16/2009
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: www.lifesitenews.com
- Tags: Topic: Homosexual Agenda
Orin Kerr writes at the Volokh Conspiracy: “The basic dynamic of Ninth Circuit ‘liberal lion’ Stephen Reinhardt overturning a death sentence in a habeas case – and then the U.S. Supreme Court reversing Reinhardt — happens so often that it normally would not merit comment. But here’s a slight twist: Today the Supreme Court reversed Reinhardt for the third time in the same case, that of Fernando Belmontes, Jr.”
- Posted: 11/16/2009
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: volokh.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Court: 9th Circuit, Court: U.S. Supreme
The Christian Century: “With the stroke of a pen, President Obama expanded federal hate-crime laws to include sexual orientation and gender identity as protected categories . . . ‘This law is a grave threat to the First Amendment because it provides special penalties based on what people think, feel or believe,’ said Erik Stanley . . . Stanley said some Christian ministers in other countries with hate-crime laws have been charged for inciting hatred against gays by preaching.”
- Posted: 11/16/2009
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.christiancentury.org
- Tags: ADF: Erik Stanley, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, Group: National Religious Broadcasters, Topic: Hate Crimes, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: White House
LifeNews: “‘Respecting people’s First Amendment rights is worthy of praise, not punishment,’ said ADF Litigation Staff Counsel David Hacker. ‘The recall election against Steve was wrongly motivated and flawed. The entire process against him began because he stood up for the free speech rights of a pro-life group. In their haste to punish him for that stand, ASG members did not follow the law. Though we are pleased that they recognize this problem and reinstated Steve as president, we are disappointed with the ongoing and apparently relentless attempt to punish him by seeking to impeach him from office.’”
- Posted: 11/16/2009
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- |
- Source: www.lifenews.com
- Tags: ADF: Center for Academic Freedom, ADF: David Hacker, ADF: Media Clips, Category: Sanctity of Life, State: California, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Education
Findlaw: “Professor Carl Tobias recently argued that Senate Republicans are keeping President Obama from appointing federal judges. He is wrong on both his facts and his conclusions. As a reminder, the Democratic majority is 60-40 in the Senate and 12-7 on the Judiciary Committee. This is their largest majority in more than 30 years. It is time for Democrats and their defenders to stop making excuses and trying to blame everyone else. Those who want to achieve power, and who have been given power by the American people, should take responsibility for their own political actions.”
- Posted: 11/16/2009
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: writ.lp.findlaw.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Topic: Nominations
Riazat Butt writes at The Guardian: “To people wondering why creationism was getting any kind of platform, Anglican priest Michael Roberts offers a reminder. Creationism is totally untrue. It exposes people of the book – many of whom, among them distinguished speakers at this conference, see no contradiction between evolutionary theory and their faith – to ridicule. And if it gains traction with governments or other authorities, then the public practice of science and research will be hindered.”
- Posted: 11/16/2009
- |
- Category: Global
- |
- Source: www.guardian.co.uk
- Tags: Category: Global, Topic: Education, Topic: Evolution, Topic: Islam
Examiner.com: “The Freedom From Religion Foundation, responding to complaints from concerned Indianapolis taxpayers, has sent a letter of strong objection to the Indianapolis Public School system for its policy of censorship of web content that promotes or provides information about ‘atheistic views.’ This policy, which also censors Wicca, Witchcraft, ‘voodoo rituals or any other for of mysticism,’ is unlawful because it violates the Free Speech Clause as unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination, FFRF charges.”
- Posted: 11/16/2009
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: www.examiner.com
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, Group: Freedom from Religion Foundation, State: Indiana, Topic: Education
Andrew Trevor Williams, Taking Values Seriously: Towards a Philosophy of EU Law (November 11, 2009). Warwick School of Law Research. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1504067
“This article argues that the existing philosophy of EU law, such as it may be perceived, is flawed. Through a series of propositions it claims that EU law is infected by an underlying indeterminacy of ideal that has deeply affected the appreciation and realisation of stated values. These values, the most fundamental of which appear in Article 6(1) of the Treaty of European Union, have been applied in a haphazard fashion and without an understanding of normative content. The European Court of Justice has instead adopted a largely pragmatic approach that has focused on principles or virtues of governance rather than attempting to offer a way of satisfactorily defining values or ensuring their realisation. The underlying philosophy thus appears to be based on a theory of interpretation (of original political will) rather than a theory of justice. The recent decision in Kadi paradoxically offers both confirmation of the argument presented but also a judicial appreciation that a new direction may be desirable, one inspired by a law based on the predominance of fundamental values with particular emphasis on respect for fundamental rights.”
- Posted: 11/16/2009
- |
- Category: Global
- |
- Source: ssrn.com
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: European Union, Court: European Court of Justice, Topic: International Law, Topic: Legal Periodicals
Joanna Erdman, Moral Authority in English and American Abortion Law (2009). CONSTITUTING EQUALITY: GENDER EQUALITY AND COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, Susan H. Williams, ed., pp. 107-132, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1499324
“This chapter uses the contrast and rejection of American authorities in Axon to expose a fundamental characteristic underlying the English constitutional approach to young women’s abortion care. It is a shared rather than contrasted characteristic in American and English law. The characteristic is moral authority, defined as the legal authority to protect a state interest in prenatal life through moral abortion decision-making. Both American and English abortion law seek to protect a state interest in prenatal life by entrusting decision-making about young women’s abortion care to third parties: the family, the court, and the medical profession. Neither constitutional approach vests moral authority in young women themselves.”
- Posted: 11/16/2009
- |
- Category: Global
- |
- Source: ssrn.com
- Tags: Category: Global, Category: Sanctity of Life, Country: United Kingdom, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Legal Periodicals
|

Latest Posts
-
www.necn.com
05/18/2012
NECN.com (AP): Democrats who control the Senate Judiciary Committee have agreed to give Gov. Chris Christie’s third nominee to the state Supreme Court a hearing, but the gay, black Republican will face difficulty being confirmed because of his lack of courtroom experience and his vow to stay out of same-sex marriage cases.
-
www.turtlebayandbeyond.org
05/18/2012
Turtle Bay and Beyond: The Secretary of Gender, Youth and Child Development in Trinidad and Tabago, Verna St Rose Greaves announced this week that she supports not only the legalization of abortion but also the promotion of gay rights.
-
www.charlotteobserver.com
05/18/2012
Charlotte Observer: Our first instinct, as opponents of North Carolina’s constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage, is to challenge it any way possible and show the harm it inflicts. So we understand those who encourage the Charlotte City Council to offer same-sex benefits to its employees – even if it gets the city sued. But council members made a smarter decision last night, voting 9-2 to get an opinion from the N.C. attorney general on the issue before including the benefits in the next fiscal year budget.

|