David Balch writes at the Monterey Herald: “In her Sunday guest commentary, Pacific Grove attorney and ACLU board member Michelle Welsh cited an impressive display of cases to support her position that the ACLU is not ‘anti-religion.’ But she is cleverly arguing a bait and switch . . . Welsh’s examples concern the ACLU’s free exercise lawsuits. But it is the ACLU’s establishment clause lawsuit, which she doesn’t address, that have earned it the ‘anti-religion’ moniker . . . ”
- Posted: 12/01/2009
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: www.montereyherald.com
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom
Sex Education: What Kind? Who Pays? What’s the Result?
Capitol Research Center, Kate Knable, 12.2009
“The Bush administration promoted federally-funded abstinence education as an alternative to so-called ‘comprehensive sex education,’ the norm in public schools for nearly 50 years. But the abstinence policy is under relentless attack by progressive sex education advocacy groups. The Obama administration now proposes to de-fund abstinence education and divert the funding to ‘fact-based’ sex ed.”
- Posted: 12/01/2009
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- |
- Source: www.capitalresearch.org
- Tags: Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: Family Research Council (FRC), Topic: Abortion, Topic: Abstinence, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Education, Topic: Sex Indoctrination, Topic: White House
The Spectator: “Given the association of so many of its founding fathers with the dismal pseudo- science of eugenics, perhaps we should not be surprised that our welfare system has ended up preferring safety nets to trampolines, or that it prefers simply to warehouse the poor rather than give people who have fallen on hard times a chance to take responsibility for their own lives. Eugenics infected its adherents with a deeply pessimistic view of the poor, branding them as irredeemably genetically second-rate, and this view has cast a long shadow over social policy assumptions.”
- Posted: 12/01/2009
- |
- Category: Global
- |
- Source: www.spectator.co.uk
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: United Kingdom, Topic: Bioethics, Topic: Eugenics, Topic: Politics, Topic: Socialism
San Francisco Chronicle: “The Justice Department ‘should continue to defend (the law) the way that it used to,’ under the Bush administration, said attorney Jim Campbell of the Alliance Defense Fund, a conservative Christian organization that represents sponsors of California’s ban on same-sex marriage in a separate case. Campbell cited the department’s 2004 filing in the Orange County case, which said the Defense of Marriage Act served the government’s ‘plainly legitimate interests in encouraging the optimal social arrangements for procreation and child-rearing.’”
- Posted: 12/01/2009
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.sfgate.com
- Tags: ADF: Jim Campbell, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Marriage and Family, State: California, State: Massachusetts, Topic: Federal DOMA, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, Topic: White House
|

Latest Posts
-
www.necn.com
05/18/2012
NECN.com (AP): Democrats who control the Senate Judiciary Committee have agreed to give Gov. Chris Christie’s third nominee to the state Supreme Court a hearing, but the gay, black Republican will face difficulty being confirmed because of his lack of courtroom experience and his vow to stay out of same-sex marriage cases.
-
www.turtlebayandbeyond.org
05/18/2012
Turtle Bay and Beyond: The Secretary of Gender, Youth and Child Development in Trinidad and Tabago, Verna St Rose Greaves announced this week that she supports not only the legalization of abortion but also the promotion of gay rights.
-
www.charlotteobserver.com
05/18/2012
Charlotte Observer: Our first instinct, as opponents of North Carolina’s constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage, is to challenge it any way possible and show the harm it inflicts. So we understand those who encourage the Charlotte City Council to offer same-sex benefits to its employees – even if it gets the city sued. But council members made a smarter decision last night, voting 9-2 to get an opinion from the N.C. attorney general on the issue before including the benefits in the next fiscal year budget.

|