Eugene Volokh responds once again to David French at the Volokh Conspiracy: “Likewise, it seems to me that there is an eminently conceivable, and legitimate, state interest in denying government funds to groups that discriminate based on religion, sexual orientation, and such, even when the discrimination is “commonsense” and “mission-based.” It is reasonable and legitimate for the state to say that public funds, to which taxpayers and students of all religions and sexual orientations contribute, not be spent in any fashion — even noninvidious fashion — which subsidizes religious or sexual orientation discrimination.”
Part VII: French: And Yet Another Response to Professor Volokh
Part VI: Volokh: The First Amendment and the Race Discrimination Bogeyman
Part V: Volokh: Should access to public university property and funding be treated differently from access to other public property and funding?
Part IV: French: Responding to Professor Eugene Volokh (the sequel: CLS v. Martinez)
Part III: Volokh: Christian Legal Society v. Martinez and the Court’s University Speech Decisions
Part II: French: A Preliminary Response to Professor Volokh
Part I: Volokh: No Duty To Subsidize Student Groups’ Discriminatory Officer and Member Selection Decisions
- Posted: 12/21/2009
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: volokh.com
- Tags: ADF: David French, Category: Religious Freedom, Topic: Education, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, ZZ: Christian Legal Society v Martinez
LifeSiteNews: “According to Roger Kiska, European legal counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund, Lautsi is flawed on a number of grounds, including overreach – the ECHR is not a constitutional court – and its disregard for ‘the cultural sovereignty of each Member State.’ The Constitutional Court decision – which deals with civil service matters entirely unrelated to the crucifix case – signals that Italy may be prepared to break with the ECHR if it were to lose its appeal.”
- Posted: 12/21/2009
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.lifesitenews.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Roger Kiska, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, Country: Italy, Court: European Court of Human Rights, Global: Religious Freedom, Topic: Council of Europe
Mercator.net: “Dr Shim: ‘This movement is the Korean Gynecological Physicians’ Association, or “Gynob”, and is an organization consisting of obstetricians and gynaecologists. Currently we have about 680 listed members. Of course, Gynob is not an organization designed only to resolve the problem of abortion, but is intended to improve the distorted medical enviroment in which OB/GYNs work. It does not mean that all of the members of Gynob actively participate in Gynob activities. Our movement is led by a group of about 30 activists.’”
- Posted: 12/21/2009
- |
- Category: Global: Sanctity of Life
- |
- Source: www.mercatornet.com
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: South Korea, Global: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion
NBCChicago: [Sen. Lindsey Graham] “You know, change you can believe in, after this health care bill debacle is now becoming an empty slogan. And it’s really been replaced by seedy Chicago politics, when you think about it, backroom deals that amount to bribes.”
- Posted: 12/21/2009
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- |
- Source: www.nbcchicago.com
- Tags: Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Congress, Topic: Insurance, Topic: Legislation, Topic: Politics, Topic: White House
Baby Doe and Beyond: Examining the Practical and Philosophical Influences Impacting Medical Decision-Making on Behalf of Marginally-Viable Newborns
Craig A. Conway, 25 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 1097 (2009)
“Advances in technology and medical education in the past century have allowed doctors to save some of these extremely premature newborns who previously would have most certainly died. However, the philosophical, ethical, and legal concerns raised by attempting to preserve these infants are being weighed by an increasing number of decision makers. Whereas, prior to the 1970s, decisions regarding the infant’s treatment plan were primarily in the hands of the parents and physicians-that is no longer the case. What was once a private decision made by these grief-stricken parents with the advice of their physicians has since become a matter for the public domain.”
- Posted: 12/21/2009
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- Tags: Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Bioethics, Topic: Legal Periodicals
Bret Boyce, Equality and the Free Exercise of Religion (November 11, 2009). Cleveland State Law Review, Vol. 57, p. 493, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1504297
“The most contentious issue in constitutional free exercise doctrine is whether exemptions for religiously motivated conduct are constitutionally required or permitted. For decades, the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence in this area has been in considerable disarray. In recent years the Court has increasingly rejected the notion of constitutionally required religious exemptions, but shown considerable indulgence for legislative exemptions. This Article argues that while the Free Exercise Clause confers the highest protection on religious belief, expression, and association, it requires equal treatment of all in the regulation of conduct, regardless of their religious beliefs or lack thereof.”
- Posted: 12/21/2009
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: ssrn.com
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, Topic: Jurisprudence, Topic: Legal Periodicals, Topic: RLUIPA
Culture, Religion, and Indigenous People
David Bogen and Leslie F. Goldstein, 69 Md. L. Rev. 48 (2009)
“The Constitution treats culture, religion, and government as separate concepts. Different clauses of the First Amendment protect culture and religion from government. For several decades, the Supreme Court of the United States interpreted the First Amendment as offering religion greater protection against interference than was offered to culture, but the Supreme Court largely dissolved these constitutional differences when confronted with issues posed by the religious practices of Native Americans. With some indigenous Americans, the lines between culture, religion, and even government blur–challenging the Supreme Court’s assumptions about the Constitution. The uniqueness of the claims of Native Americans pushed the Supreme Court toward recognition of a common constitutional standard for religion and cultural protection, but also justified political exemptions targeted at tribal behavior that do not extend to other religions or cultures.”
- Posted: 12/21/2009
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, Topic: Jurisprudence, Topic: Legal Periodicals
From Pre-School Aides to Presidents: Themes and Scenes of the Abortion Debate
Andrew Draxton and Jessica Andrew, 11 J. L. & Fam. Stud. 457 (2009)
“His opinion of the subject of abortion, though expressed in simple terms, carries with it the same logic, emotion, and persuasive appeal that ornaments one opinion of the debate sounded in any number of circles. Indeed, everyone from construction workers to Congressmen has a moral, medical, social, or political opinion on the topic. These themes have been debated just as vigorously in living rooms, barber shops, community centers, and cyber space as they have in the halls of Congress and the courtrooms of the United States. As Greg and his mother share their own voice on the matter, this note examines similar themes as propounded by the mighty voice of the United States Executive Branch.”
- Posted: 12/21/2009
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- |
- Source: epubs.utah.edu
- Tags: Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Legal Periodicals
Kathryn Harvey, The Rights of Divorced Lesbians: Interstate Recognition of Child Custody Judgments in the Context of Same-Sex Divorce (November 18, 2009). Fordham Law Review, Vol. 78, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1508477
“This Note explores the issue of interstate recognition of child custody, which arises in the context of same-sex divorce. The Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act (PKPA) requires states to grant full faith and credit to all child custody orders; on the other hand, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) allows states to deny full faith and credit to judgments “arising out of” same-sex marriage. This Note argues that DOMA partially repeals the PKPA, such that states need not grant full faith and credit to divorce and child custody decrees in the context of same-sex marriage. Further, this Note argues that, because same-sex divorce does not raise the same concerns as same-sex marriage, sister states should recognize same-sex divorce and custody orders as doing so is in the best interest of the child and supports interstate comity.”
- Posted: 12/21/2009
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: ssrn.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Topic: Divorce, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Legal Periodicals, Topic: Marriage
Kimberly Mutcherson, Making Mommies: Law, Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis, and the Complications of Pre-Motherhood (September 26, 2008). Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1274361
“The article focuses on pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (‘PGD’), a technology that allows health care providers and potential parents to screen embryos for a range of characteristics prior to implanting them in a woman’s uterus. Many potential parents use the technology to screen out life-threatening diseases, but many have expressed concerns about the technology’s potential use to screen for benign characteristics such as sex. Recognizing the potential for future regulation, this article focuses on three major topics 1) the potential for legal regulation of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis; 2) the relationship between such future regulation and the existing legal landscape attendant to parenting, procreation, and pregnancy; 3) and the specific consequences for women of legal incursion into PGD decision-making.”
- Posted: 12/21/2009
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- |
- Source: ssrn.com
- Tags: Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Bioethics, Topic: Legal Periodicals
|
|