Tiger Woods’ father: marriage is unnecessary

    Tim Worstall writes at Examiner.com: “So if marriage is not necessary to have and to raise children and marriage isn’t necessary to have sex then marriage isn’t necessary at all then, is it? This doesn’t mean that marriage isn’t desirable, or enjoyable, or even good for society and children. It just means that Earl Woods was right: marriage is unnecessary in a society like ours.”


  • Posted: 12/28/2009
  • |
  • Category: Marriage & Family
  • |
  • Source: www.examiner.com

  • Tags: ,

National Religious Broadcasters: Don’t Reallocate Broadband Spectrum To Wireless

Rhode Island football field fight highlights church-state issues

Catholic Health Association: We Agree With Bishops on Abortion, Health Care

San Diego’s Campaign Finance Law Challenged in Federal Court

Jewish Christian in Israel Seeks Protection from Repeated Attacks

Latest test for church, state

“Sex and the City” star joins ACLU campaign to end Florida ban on homosexual adoption

NJ: “‘Eternal optimist’ Weinberg leads gay marriage push in state Senate”

Iran Opposition Claims Widespread Arrests, Condemns Sunday Violence

LUV Iowa: Marriage rallies to open legislative session

“Senate confirms in Minn. 1st openly gay US marshal”

Catholic hospitals and bishops split on Senate health-bill abortion compromise

Illinois: “Governor candidates divided on abortion, gay marriage”

UK: Girls using abortion as birth control and having up to FOUR terminations by the age of 18

Thousands of Spanish Catholics march against abortion and “gay marriage”

“Gay Candidates Get Support That Causes May Not”

Michigan Faces Constitutional Case Over Cash-Strapped Public Defenders

Effort Begun to End Voting for Judges

Senate passes healthcare reform legislation in 60-39 vote

Queensland, Australia Government Refuses Bid to Remove Abortion Ban Law

How the ACLU tried to steal Christmas… again

Mexico pro-lifer forces swaying state legislatures

Ten Commandment Projects Thwart ACLU

Supreme Court case will bear on Soledad Cross

“Cancer-stricken Shaker Heights bus driver, Cleveland’s Domestic Partners Registry, Yacker Trackers, Maple Heights landlord law: Whatever Happened To?”

Massachusetts: Appeals Court Affirms Conviction of Street Preacher For Disorderly Conduct

Federal Court Enjoins Illinois Hike In Fees For Lobbyists, Partly on Establishment Clause Grounds

Pending Lawsuit Challenges Favoritism To Catholic School In Use of City Athletic Fields

Extending Federal Benefits to Same-Sex Couples Will Cost $898M, CBO Says

U.S. Supreme Court asks TX Solicitor General to weigh in on parental rights case

Soft on Prostitution

Degrading Sex, Government Style

“D.C. Gay Marriage Opponents Press For Public Vote”

Parents pray for missionary thought held in NKorea

“Christian Photographers Must Shoot Gay Weddings”

Bubble zone evens out

Michigan Forces Business Owners Into Public Sector Unions

Keeping America’s edge

    Jim Manzi, senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, writes in National Affairs: “The new normal, however, is different from the old normal. To begin with, certain strands of the old bourgeois consensus have frayed, and others have simply disappeared, at least for some parts of the ­population. The wealthier and better-educated segments of our ­society, for ­example, have re-established the primacy of stable families and revived their ­intolerance of crime and public disorder. But they have combined this return to tradition with very non-traditional attitudes about sex, ­masculinity, and overt piety.”


  • Posted: 12/28/2009
  • |
  • Category: Marriage & Family
  • |
  • Source: www.nationalaffairs.com

  • Tags: , , ,

D.C. Conservatives Push for Marriage Vote

Judges Gone Wild: Michigan defines judicial bias down

    Wall Street Journal: “In Caperton v. Massey, the Supremes set out a new standard requiring judges to recuse themselves if there is a “probability of bias” in a case. That was a marked departure from historical standards, which required a judge to step off primarily when he had a direct financial interest. Under a new rule, created by the Michigan Supreme Court to govern the state’s judicial recusal standards, a judge’s impartiality may be challenged by the parties in the case, and if he declines to recuse himself, he may still be voted off the case by his fellow judges.”


  • Posted: 12/28/2009
  • |
  • Category: Bench & Bar
  • |
  • Source: online.wsj.com

  • Tags: ,

Senate Democrats, GOP Squabble Over Pro-Abortion Obama Pick Dawn Johnsen

ABA Presses the Case for Loan Relief for Law Graduates