Linking to the LA Times, the Hot Air Blog reports on the ACLU’s role in opposing no-fly lists. Gabriel Schoenfeld writes at the LA Times: “We will never know whether fierce criticism from the left had any direct effect on the processing of Abdulmutallab’s file, but the political environment is important to consider going forward. The officials managing the watch lists are not eager to be hauled before a congressional committee if they blunder and bar innocent people from getting on flights. But they are also acutely aware of the potential price tag of being under-inclusive.”
- Posted: 12/29/2009
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: hotair.com
Baptist Press: “Religious liberty suffered a setback in the U.S. but won a victory in Canada in December in two closely watched cases involving the legal tug-of-war between religious rights and ‘gay rights’ . . . Attorneys allied with the Alliance Defense Fund, a Christian legal group, are involved in both cases . . . ‘Christians in the marketplace should not be subject to predatory legal attacks for simply abiding by their beliefs,’ ADF Senior Counsel Jordan Lorence said in a statement.”
- Posted: 12/29/2009
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.bpnews.net
- Tags: ADF: Allied Attorney, ADF: Jordan Lorence, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Global, Category: Religious Freedom, Country: Canada, Global: Religious Freedom, State: New Mexico, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, ZZ: Boissoin v Lund, ZZ: Elane Photography LLC v Willock
Christian Post: “Despite what many might believe, a vast majority of home-schooled children say they have plenty of opportunities for socialization with other children and, as adults, come to excel in all measured areas of adult life, according to a new study. The study, released this month by the Canadian Centre for Home Education (CCHE), surveyed young adults in Canada whose parents responded to a 1994 study on home education. Ranging in age from 15 to 34, the study’s participants answered questions on a variety of topics with comparable data from Statistics Canada.”
- Posted: 12/29/2009
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: www.christianpost.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Group: Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA), Topic: Education, Topic: Home School, Topic: Polls, Topic: School Choice, Topic: Studies
“At the end of the first decade of the 21st century, the question is not whether we will preside over the creation of a New World Order, but whether America’s decline is irreversible.”
- Posted: 12/29/2009
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: www.cnsnews.com
- Tags: Topic: Culture
Assyrian International News Agency: “The program was aired in mid-November 2009, and interviewed Mr. Magdi Khalil, an authority on Coptic affairs who has made a complete field study on forced Islamization of Christian minors in Egypt. Mr Khalil explained that this phenomenon in its present form is nearly 40 years old, and most of these conversion crimes, with a few isolated exceptions, are carried out by organized Islamization gangs or ‘Islamization Mafia’, a termed coined by him, which are fully funded by the state and supported by State Security.”
- Posted: 12/29/2009
- |
- Category: Global: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: www.aina.org
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: Egypt, Global: Religious Freedom, Topic: Islam
Marseille Journal, New York Times: “The large new mosque, which its builders call ‘the symbol of Marseillais Islam,’ is a source of pride here in France’s second-largest city, which is at least 25 percent Muslim. But it is also cause for alarm, Mr. Geisser said, embodying the paradox that visible signs of integration set off xenophobic anxiety. ‘All these symbols reveal a deeper, more lasting presence of Islam,’ he said. ‘It’s the passage of something temporary to something that is implanted and takes root.’”
- Posted: 12/29/2009
- |
- Category: Global: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: www.nytimes.com
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: France, Global: Religious Freedom, Topic: Islam
David French, Director of the ADF Center for Academic Freedom, writing at Phi Beta Cons: “[L]ast week, on Christmas Eve eve, FIRE stung the University of Minnesota . . . Katherine Kersten broke the story, and then FIRE was all over it, reminding the university of its constitutional obligations and alerting the larger public to a proposal that was basically a magnet for federal litigation. After just a few days of pressure, the university did the right thing. In a letter to FIRE, the university’s counsel pledged that the school would never ‘mandate any particular beliefs, or screen out people with “wrong beliefs” from the University.’”
- Posted: 12/29/2009
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: phibetacons.nationalreview.com
- Tags: ADF: David French, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, Group: Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), State: Minnesota, Topic: Education
OneNewsNow: “Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) is appealing a decision to permit a bad speech policy to stand while a lawsuit against Georgia State University proceeds . . . ‘Some officers affiliated with Georgia Southern said basically he could either keep quiet, stop talking about Jesus, or be arrested — and while he was trying to confer with the officers about this, they just decided to arrest him,’ Kellum explains.”
- Posted: 12/29/2009
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.onenewsnow.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Nate Kellum, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, State: Georgia, Topic: Education, ZZ: Bloedorn v Grube
Christian Post: “‘The people of D.C. have a right to vote on the definition of marriage,’ commented Austin R. Nimocks, senior legal counsel at Alliance Defense Fund, which has filed a lawsuit on behalf of eight D.C. citizens. ‘The D.C. Charter guarantees the people the right to vote, and the council cannot amend the charter for any reason, much less to deny citizens the right to vote,’ he added in a statement.”
- Posted: 12/29/2009
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- |
- Source: www.christianpost.com
- Tags: ADF: Austin R. Nimocks, ADF: Media Clips, Category: Marriage and Family, Topic: District of Columbia, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Jackson v District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics
TIME: “The new poll has Crist and Rubio even at 43 points, a 10-point swing for both men since last August. It’s a sign, says Aubrey Jewett, a Florida politics expert at the University of Central Florida in Orlando, that “political gravity has caught up with Crist,” who until last summer had had approval ratings near 70%, but to many Floridians now seems at a loss about how to jump-start jobs.”
- Posted: 12/29/2009
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: www.time.com
- Tags: State: Florida, Topic: Politics
Government Endorsement of Living on a Prayer: Religious Exemptions from the Duty to Provide Medical Treatment for Children
Ashley Dose, 30 J. Legal Med. 515 (2009)
“Religious exemptions from the parental duty to provide medical care implicate a wide variety of legal issues, but this article focuses exclusively on the Religion Clauses of the First Amendment. First, the exemptions are not mandated by the Free Exercise Clause because the Supreme Court has stated that the free exercise of religion does not include a right to martyr one’s children. Second, the exemptions are not a permissible accommodation of religion under the Establishment Clause. The statutes are divided into two categories for purposes of the Establishment Clause analysis: those that grant an exemption only to recognized religions and those that treat all religions uniformly. The statutes that prefer recognized religions over nonrecognized religions clearly violate the Establishment Clause under the Supreme Court’s holding in Larson v. Valente. The statutes that treat all religions uniformly are a much closer call, and could go either way depending on which standard of analysis is employed.”
- Posted: 12/29/2009
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Bioethics, Topic: Legal Periodicals, Topic: Parental Rights
Could Government Speech Endorsing a Higher Law Resolve the Establishment Clause Crisis?
Bruce Ledewitz, 41 St. Mary’s L.J. 41 (2009)
“The crisis in Establishment Clause interpretation consists in the Supreme Court’s unwillingness to enforce the promise of government neutrality toward religion made in Everson in 1947 and its inability to offer an alternative interpretation that would gain majority support among the Justices and the American people. The crisis is symbolized by the Court’s reversal on standing grounds of the Ninth Circuit’s judgment that the words ‘under God’ in the Pledge of Allegiance violate the Establishment Clause, thus “ducking” the case and the principle involved. The government speech doctrine would redeem Everson’s promise of neutrality without imposing a purely secular public realm on an American people unwilling to accept that kind of public life. Government may endorse the concept of higher law, and may do so using certain religious symbols, images and language, without establishing religion. Without specifying the relationship to the Establishment Clause, the Court used the government speech doctrine to decide the Pleasant Grove Ten Commandments case, thus suggesting the doctrine’s utility in this field. The government speech doctrine suggests changes in some, but by no means all, of the caselaw in Establishment Clause jurisprudence.”
- Posted: 12/29/2009
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, Topic: Legal Periodicals
|
|