At issue: Judicial flexibility in porn sentences

OneNewsNow: “Pat Trueman, special counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund, understands that judges feel a measure of comparison between a murder that in some states might draw a sentence of ten years and a child pornography conviction that might mean 18 years. ‘But on the other hand,’ he argues, ‘we have a crisis in child exploitation in this country — and reducing sentences is exactly the wrong approach. What we need is a better way to cut down on the number of people who get involved with child pornography.’”