Supreme Court brief of CLS students raises intriguing “culture war” pointADF attorney Jordan Lorence writing at the Academic Freedom File (Jan. 1): “On the other hand, if Respondents [UC-Hasings Law School] were to prevail in this case, it would provoke a collusion between religious freedom and rights of sexual orientation. That would mean, in essence, that when sexual orientation is added to the list of forbidden grounds under non-discrimination laws, religious and other groups that adhere to traditional moral views could be driven from the public square in the name of enforcing non-discrimination. This would raise the stakes in the political battles over sexual orientation discrimination to a dangerous extent . . . ” Related: |