3 Republican legislators challenge same-sex “marriage” effort at N.J. Supreme Court

Vietnam releases Christian prisoner, allows U.S. evangelist to address pastors

UK: Innocent Christian hoteliers forced to sell their business

UK: Police question MP over Islamic veil comments

Scotland: Christian preacher fined for speaking on homosexuality

EU will let citizens offer laws – but on condition

UK: Compulsory sex education undermines free society

MN: 4 Bloomington massage parlors lose licenses

MD: Move rejected to impeach AG over same-sex “marriage”

Australia: Court to rule on religious schooling

UK: Kids’ mobile phones need porn filters, says report

UK: Crucifix banned at hospital where Muslims allowed to wear headscarves

FL: Sex Store, City At Odds Over Peepshows

Charity defends Christian-only hiring

Proposed Belgian Burqa Ban “A Concern” For European Commission

Tenn. bill to require abortion coercion signs

Alan Sears: Elmira Man Arrested for Standing – and Lying Down – for the Truth

FL: School Prayer Support From A Jackson County Lawmaker

Online Muslim sex shop launched in the Netherlands

FL: Lawmakers want “sexting” penalties eased to remove porn charge

VA: AG talks “gay rights”, health care at Liberty U.

    WSLS10 (includes video): “Cuccinelli has grabbed the national spotlight in his two months at Attorney General, which is usually a lower profile state government position. That attention came with his recommendation to the state’s public universities and colleges to remove anti-discrimination clauses about sexual orientation. A move that quickly sparked a wave of anger across the Commonwealth, and spread across the country . . . ‘They (colleges) went beyond their state law authority. Everyone has the potential for protection under the Equal Protection Clause of the federal Constitution, but that’s not a specially protected class,’ Cuccinelli said.”


  • Posted: 03/31/2010
  • |
  • Category: Religious Freedom
  • |
  • Source: www2.wsls.com

  • Tags: , , , ,

IL: Give abortion notification law chance to work

VA: Politicians rally around Richmond charter school

Kansas Sends Bill to Enforce Late-Term Abortion Laws to Governor Parkinson

“Homosexual activist appeals exoneration of Canadian Pastor Boissoin”

Nebraska Bill to Ban Late-Term Abortions Based on Fetal Pain Passes First Vote

Abortion is Safer Than Childbirth? Studies Show Abortion More Risky for Women

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Urges Canada to Promote Abortion at G8 Mtg

Journalists’ E-Mails Hacked in China

China’s Censors Thrive in Obscurity

“Catholic bishops intervene in British election”

Just in Time for Easter: Romanian Refugees Denied Religious Freedom in Dallas County

Muslim scholars recast jihadists’ favourite fatwa

Day of Reckoning for the ACLU’s Attempts to Criminalize Prayer in Santa Rosa County

Maryland: Impeachment Threat Over Gay Marriage

“Army chief sees defacto moratorium on gay discharges”

N.J. Supreme Court upholds privacy of personal e-mails accessed at work

MS: Constance McMillen Invited to Private Prom, Lesbian Partner and Tux Allowed

Duke University Women’s Center issues apology to pro-life group after dustup

Live Action pleased with school’s change of heart

AZ: Gilbert officials aim to revise arbitrary ordinance

TN: Cheatham County seminar will focus on teachers’ religious rights

West Virginia woman gets medical care after hospital refuses treatment

Body parts found at Kansas medical waste company

GOP wary of health law repeal push in fall races

Rural tradition eyed after China dead babies find

Alan Sears: Feldblum Appointment Underscores Threat of Homosexual Agenda to Liberty

The Dirty Secret Of Embryonic Stem Cell Research

ADF attorneys to debate in Illinois, Kansas on Supreme Court case involving Christian student group

Law Review: Modifying RLUIPA to Create a Constitutional Statutory Protection for Religious Landowners

    Modifying the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act to Create a Constitutional Statutory Protection for Religious Landowners
    Sara Witt, 59 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 767 (2009)

    “Part I will provide background regarding Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence, RLUIPA’s legislative history, and Congress’s enforcement power, one basis Congress claimed as giving it authority to enact RLUIPA and its unconstitutional predecessor, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Part II will argue that enactment of RLUIPA was outside Congress’s Fourteenth Amendment enforcement power. Specifically, it will consider whether RLUIPA codifies Supreme Court precedent and whether the Act is ‘congruent and proportional’ to the harm it seeks to remedy. Part II will ultimately conclude that neither of these tests is met. Part III will argue that some statutory protection is necessary for those seeking to use land for religious purposes and will suggest how RLUIPA may be modified so as to provide this protection while remaining within the confines of the enforcement power.”


  • Posted: 03/31/2010
  • |
  • Category: Religious Freedom

  • Tags: , , ,

Law Review: A Case Study in Dignity and Personhood and the Standard of Review for Withdrawal of Treatment

    The Minimally Conscious Person: A Case Study in Dignity and Personhood and the Standard of Review for Withdrawal of Treatment
    Jeffrey B. Hammond, 55 Wayne L. Rev. 821 (2009)

    “To date, most American courts that have considered family members’ requests to remove life-sustaining treatment for minimally conscious patients have denied such requests, reasoning that no surrogate has demonstrated by ‘clear and convincing evidence’ that patient would want to be die by removal of his medically supplied nutrition and hydration. The thesis of this Article is that the four courts that have *828 considered removal of life-sustaining treatment for MCS patients have heretofore been correctly decided. I argue that when the clear and convincing evidentiary standard is coupled with the ‘subjective’ substantive evidentiary standard—requiring proof that that the patient foresaw himself being beset with MCS and then wanted his feeding tube removed—it will be very hard indeed for a court to allow the patient’s tube to be removed.”


  • Posted: 03/31/2010
  • |
  • Category: Sanctity of Life

  • Tags: , , ,