ADF President and General Counsel Alan Sears writes at the ADF website, “Inside the Issues”: “Just two weeks ago, I told you about Julian Raven, an Elmira, New York man who, along with his wife and several friends, was arrested in a city park when they quietly lay down to silently pray for, and amid, a crowd of people celebrating homosexual behavior . . . ”
- Posted: 03/31/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.alliancedefensefund.org
- Tags: ADF: Alan E. Sears, ADF: Joel Oster, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, State: New York, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, ZZ: People of the State of New York v. Raven
WSLS10 (includes video): “Cuccinelli has grabbed the national spotlight in his two months at Attorney General, which is usually a lower profile state government position. That attention came with his recommendation to the state’s public universities and colleges to remove anti-discrimination clauses about sexual orientation. A move that quickly sparked a wave of anger across the Commonwealth, and spread across the country . . . ‘They (colleges) went beyond their state law authority. Everyone has the potential for protection under the Equal Protection Clause of the federal Constitution, but that’s not a specially protected class,’ Cuccinelli said.”
- Posted: 03/31/2010
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: www2.wsls.com
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, State: Virginia, Topic: Education, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Insurance
OneNewsNow: “A college student in New York is now free to distribute a pro-life publication . . . ‘[S]tudent Joseph Hayon was distributing The Advocate to his peers, and the administration ordered him to cease distributing the magazine, telling him he could no longer distribute it,’ [Live Action president Lila Rose] reports . . . Hayon contacted Alliance Defense Fund, which in turn wrote to the school, explaining how that stance represented viewpoint discrimination. The result is that Hayon is now permitted to resume distribution.”
- Posted: 03/31/2010
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- |
- Source: www.onenewsnow.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Category: Religious Freedom, Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: Live Action, State: New York, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Education
OneNewsNow: “Gilbert, Arizona, is trying to straighten out its zoning laws for the sake of house churches . . . Alliance Defense Fund wrote a letter to the city, outlining the churches’ constitutional rights. Meanwhile, Mayor Lewis had a chance to attend a church service at the home targeted by the city . . . [Mayor Lewis] says the code will be changed, which will allow house churches to hold services, Bible studies, or prayer meetings without concern of government intervention.”
- Posted: 03/31/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.onenewsnow.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, State: Arizona, Topic: RLUIPA
Modifying the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act to Create a Constitutional Statutory Protection for Religious Landowners
Sara Witt, 59 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 767 (2009)
“Part I will provide background regarding Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence, RLUIPA’s legislative history, and Congress’s enforcement power, one basis Congress claimed as giving it authority to enact RLUIPA and its unconstitutional predecessor, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Part II will argue that enactment of RLUIPA was outside Congress’s Fourteenth Amendment enforcement power. Specifically, it will consider whether RLUIPA codifies Supreme Court precedent and whether the Act is ‘congruent and proportional’ to the harm it seeks to remedy. Part II will ultimately conclude that neither of these tests is met. Part III will argue that some statutory protection is necessary for those seeking to use land for religious purposes and will suggest how RLUIPA may be modified so as to provide this protection while remaining within the confines of the enforcement power.”
- Posted: 03/31/2010
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, Topic: Legal Periodicals, Topic: RFRA, Topic: RLUIPA
The Minimally Conscious Person: A Case Study in Dignity and Personhood and the Standard of Review for Withdrawal of Treatment
Jeffrey B. Hammond, 55 Wayne L. Rev. 821 (2009)
“To date, most American courts that have considered family members’ requests to remove life-sustaining treatment for minimally conscious patients have denied such requests, reasoning that no surrogate has demonstrated by ‘clear and convincing evidence’ that patient would want to be die by removal of his medically supplied nutrition and hydration. The thesis of this Article is that the four courts that have *828 considered removal of life-sustaining treatment for MCS patients have heretofore been correctly decided. I argue that when the clear and convincing evidentiary standard is coupled with the ‘subjective’ substantive evidentiary standard—requiring proof that that the patient foresaw himself being beset with MCS and then wanted his feeding tube removed—it will be very hard indeed for a court to allow the patient’s tube to be removed.”
- Posted: 03/31/2010
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- Tags: Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Bioethics, Topic: Euthanasia, Topic: Legal Periodicals
|
|