Finland: Late abortion ups later pregnancy termination risk

CT: Planned Parenthood abortion referral business closes

Utah: “WVC approves legal protections for LGBT people”

University of Arizona to provide health insurance to same-sex partners

France to bar polygamy, sharia on Mayotte islands

President Obama extends additional benefits to same-sex partners of federal employees

Spanish town council bans Muslim veils in public buildings

Church aid groups deny Afghan charge of proselytizing

    Pew Forum: “Afghan officials have ordered two international church-backed humanitarian groups to suspend operations while they investigate allegations of illegal proselytizing, which the groups strongly deny . . . ‘Norwegian Church Aid does not proselytize in any of the countries in which it works. This policy is also enforced in Afghanistan,’ NCA said on its website. ‘Norwegian Church Aid has been working in Afghanistan since 1979 and has since 1995 mainly implemented its programs through Afghan organizations.’”


  • Posted: 06/02/2010
  • |
  • Category: Global: Religious Freedom
  • |
  • Source: pewforum.org

  • Tags: , , ,

Guttmacher: Facts on contraceptive use in the United States

Germany: Federal Court of Justice to decide euthanasia case

    aerzteblatt.de: “[The Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) in Karlsruhe will rule concerning] the [attempted] euthanasia of a terminally ill woman at [a] hearing on Wednesday. She [had lain] in a coma since a cerebral hemorrhage in 2002 at a nursing home in Bad Hersfeld, and [had previously] expressed the wish that [in such a case] the artificial diet [would be] discontinued . . . [Following the attempt] the court sentenced [the daughter's lawyer] to a term of imprisonment of nine months probation for attempted homicide; the daughter was acquitted because [she] had acted in view of the legal advice of the lawyer [and] without guilt. Both the lawyer and the prosecutor appealed to the Supreme Court. Whether the judge make a ruling on Wednesday, is completely open.” [Modified Google translation]


  • Posted: 06/02/2010
  • |
  • Category: Global: Sanctity of Life

  • Tags: , , , ,

MP moves to decriminalize prostitution in South Australia

Russia: Dagestan’s controls on Islamic education

Goldwater Institute will appeal Ninth Circuit Clean Elections decision, refile injunction request

CT: Southington OKs new regulations for sexually oriented businesses

NJ: Planned Parenthood reps removed from sex-ed class

SC legislators make no progress on abortion bill

SC lawmakers nix $5B budget plan over drug cuts, abortion

The Incorporation Doctrine and the religion clauses

    At the New Ledger Pejman Yousefzadeh reviews Hunter Baker’s The End of Secularism: “I take issue with his claim that the Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses of the First Amendment cannot be incorporated against the states. As we know, of course, pursuant to the Incorporation Doctrine, the Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses are found to apply against the states via the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.”


  • Posted: 06/02/2010
  • |
  • Category: Religious Freedom

  • Tags: , ,

For Christians in Iraq, the threats persist

Simmering anger may drive religious right back to polls

More teens using rhythm method for birth control

Attack on marriage in Minn. draws intervention effort

China: Senior official calls for promotion of religious values

Australia: Council moves to non-denominational cemeteries

    ABC News: “One local council is bracing for a community backlash as it moves toward introducing non-denominational cemeteries. Cemeteries in the Nambucca Shire are expected to abandon the use of denominational burial sites within the next 10 years. The council plans to introduce unsegregated areas at Nambucca Heads, Macksville and Bowraville cemeteries because they are running out of plots and the lack of space could push up burial costs.”


  • Posted: 06/02/2010
  • |
  • Category: Global: Religious Freedom
  • |
  • Source: www.abc.net.au

  • Tags: , ,

Ten member states join Italy in support of the crucifix

Kevin Theriot: Federal court erodes religious freedom

    ADF Attorney Kevin Theriot writing at Speak Up University / Church: “Recently a federal court in Maryland undermined the independence of religious organizations when it allowed a nurse’s religious harassment claim against a Catholic institution to go forward. It was the first such decision of its kind. Villa St. Catherine’s is a Catholic nursing center that the Court recognized is exempt from religious discrimination provisions of Title VII – the federal law that prohibits employment discrimination. Congress wisely included this exemption so that religious organizations can maintain their religious character. This makes constitutional and practical sense. A Jewish ministry to the poor should not have to hire a Muslim, and vice versa. And when government entangles itself in the hiring and firing decisions of religious organizations, it violates the First Amendment’s protection of religious freedom. A good analysis of this aspect of Church Autonomy can be read here.


  • Posted: 06/02/2010
  • |
  • Category: ADF in the News
  • |
  • Source: blog.speakupmovement.org

  • Tags: , , , , ,

Michigan abortionist admits to forcing client into abortion

26 pro-life groups unite in nationwide protest against birth control pill

“The Prop 8 Court Can Have it All: Justice, Precedent, Respect for Democracy, and an Appropriately Limited Judicial Role”

    American Constitution Society for Law and Policy: “ACS is pleased to distribute ‘The Prop 8 Court Can Have it All: Justice, Precedent, Respect for Democracy, and an Appropriately Limited Judicial Role,’ an Issue Brief by Rebecca L. Brown, Newton Professor of Constitutional Law at the University of Southern California Gould School of Law. In this Issue Brief, Professor Brown discusses Perry v. Schwarzenegger, in which the United States District Court for the Northern District of California is considering whether the United States Constitution requires states to permit marriage between individuals of the same sex. While strong arguments may very well exist for a broad ruling, Professor Brown suggests that the case might also lend itself to a more modest resolution of the claims raised. Proposition 8 was a ballot initiative that originated as a reaction to a California Supreme Court decision interpreting California’s Constitution as requiring the state to permit same-sex couples to marry; Proposition 8 subsequently added to the California Constitution a provision that ‘[o]nly marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.’ After extensive analysis of case law, the author concludes that the United States Constitution’s Equal Protection jurisprudence dictates that Proposition 8 be struck down, since ‘[a]ny legislation must have a public purpose other than stigmatization,’ and ‘no public purpose that could plausibly be served by this retroactive reduction in status has been offered to dispel the usual inference that any act of stigmatization is a violation of the state’s obligation to legislate impartially.’”


  • Posted: 06/02/2010
  • |
  • Category: Marriage & Family
  • |
  • Source: www.acslaw.org

  • Tags: , , , ,

Irish doctor defends “fundamental right” to conscience protection

Abortions in Brazil, though illegal, are common

MN: Adult store prompts Owatonna residents to petition

CA: Exeter Union High School commencement won’t include prayer

FL: Bill would allow teachers to pray with students

“Aussie Rules star suspended over gay comments”

Clinton representative reviewing Kagan documents

German president quits over military remarks

Pregnancy centers fight back against NARAL attacks

Five new decisions emerge from a productive holiday weekend at the Court

Another lawsuit in battle between neighboring Hasidic synagogues

NY judge allows student to return to school, wear Rosary

Indiana abortion advocates challenge Fort Wayne measure for women’s safety

Law Review: The Inevitable Crash of Irreconcilable Jurisprudence: Laws Based on Orthodox Judeo-Christian Theology in a Pluralistic Society

    How the Wheels Come Off: The Inevitable Crash of Irreconcilable Jurisprudence: Laws Based on Orthodox Judeo-Christian Theology in a Pluralistic Society
    Roederick C. White, Sr., 37 S.U. L. Rev. 127

    “This article discusses the early use of orthodox Judeo-Christian theology as the foundation of many American laws. The article argues that as society shifts its philosophical viewpoint, it removes the linchpin that keeps the wheels on a given area of law. When this happens, an inevitable crash of irreconcilable jurisprudence in a given area of doctrinal law occurs.”


  • Posted: 06/02/2010
  • |
  • Category: Bench & Bar

  • Tags: , , ,

Law Review: Sex Trafficking as a Human Rights Issue

    Nidhi Nigam and Neha Vaidya, Sex Trafficking as a Human Rights Issue (May 20, 2010). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1612383

    “Multilateral treaties and customary international law condemn slavery. Since its inception, the United Nations has always been committed to the abolition or elimination of slavery.But despite a multitude of U.N. recommendations, decisions, and other pronouncements, slavery is not dead, and the traffic and sale of human beings for sexual exploitation are flourishing. Trafficking should be dealt with not as an immigration problem requiring exclusionary laws and practices, but as a human rights issue. Conceptual clarity with regard to trafficking is the only way we can prevent the enactment of laws and programmes to prevent trafficking that violate other human rights of women.”


  • Posted: 06/02/2010
  • |
  • Category: Global: Miscellaneous
  • |
  • Source: ssrn.com

  • Tags: , , , , ,

Law Review: Alternatives for Adult Uses Required When Town is Sued

    Alternatives for Adult Uses Required When Town is Sued
    Anthony S. Guardino, 5/26/2010 N.Y.L.J. 5, (col. 2)

    “The particular issue in TJS was whether the constitutionality of a zoning ordinance should only be evaluated with regard to the ‘alternative avenues of communication‘ the ordinance left open at the time it was passed, or those it left open at the time it was challenged. In TJS, the Second Circuit held that the First Amendment required courts to consider the adequacy of alternative sites available when the ordinance was challenged. Although the ruling necessitates further proceedings in the district court in the TJS case, it also may signal the coming end of a more-than-15-year-battle over a topless bar in the Town of Smithtown on Long Island.” | TJS of New York, Inc. v. Town of Smithtown, No. 08-2789-cv (2nd Cir. March 10, 2010) [CDC Abstract]


  • Posted: 06/02/2010
  • |
  • Category: Miscellaneous

  • Tags: , , , ,