Surrogate twins’ fate to be decided by French court

Study finds teens raised by lesbians are well-adjusted

UK: Church poster showing Jesus in the womb criticised as seeming “pro-life”

NY: Activists slam archdiocese for banning sex education at Clinton school

Oregon: State wants St. Helens to revise sex-ed program to include contraception

“Most Evangelical Leaders OK with Birth Control”

Turkey: Bishop’s murderer motivated by Islamic fundamentalism not homosexual advances

    Catholic World News quoting Asia News:  ”Bishop Louis Pelâtre, vicar apostolic of Istanbul, described as ‘calumnies’ the assertions attributed to Murat Altun, the bishop’s driver and admitted murderer, that he had killed Bishop Padovese because he was defending himself from the bishop’s homosexual advances . . . Witnesses said they heard the bishop cry out for help. But more importantly, is that they heard screams of Murat immediately after the murder. According to these sources, he climbed on the roof of the house shouted: “I killed the great Satan! Allah Akbar!”  This call coincides perfectly with the idea of beheading, making sense that it is like a ritual sacrifice against evil. This correlates with the murders of ultranationalist groups and Islamic fundamentalists who apparently want to eliminate Christians from Turkey . . . ”


  • Posted: 06/09/2010
  • |
  • Category: Global: Religious Freedom
  • |
  • Source: www.catholicculture.org

  • Tags: , , , ,

Conservatives v. Libertarians on judicial activism

    Damon W. Root writing at Reason: “Libertarians typically favor an aggressive judiciary that is willing to overturn mistaken precedents and strike down unconstitutional state and federal statutes. The Georgetown law professor Randy Barnett, for instance, has argued that the courts should adopt a ‘presumption of liberty,’ meaning that the government should be required ‘to justify its restriction on liberty, instead of requiring the citizen to establish that the liberty being exercised is somehow “fundamental.”‘ That position is almost the exact opposite of the judicial restraint advocated by Meese and other conservatives. As Ramesh Ponnuru of National Review has put it, judicial restraint ‘is best understood as a finger on the scales, tipping judges in close cases against invalidating the actions of Congress or state or local governments.’” | Via Randy Barnett at The Volokh Conspiracy


  • Posted: 06/09/2010
  • |
  • Category: Bench & Bar
  • |
  • Source: reason.com

  • Tags: , ,

Study: School based sex education classes have little effect

    Zimbabwe Star: “Researchers have revealed that school based sex education classes have had little effect on reported sexual behaviours among African adolescents and no effect on the prevalence of HIV and genital herpes 9 years after the start of the intervention. Researchers from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), the Tanzanian National Institute for Medical Research’s Mwanza Research Centre (NIMR Mwanza) and AMREF Tanzania studied the effect of one such study in Rural Tanzania that was designed to provide the students with the knowledge and skills needed to delay sexual debut and to reduce sexual risk taking.”


  • Posted: 06/09/2010
  • |
  • Category: Global: Sanctity of Life
  • |
  • Source: story.zimbabwestar.com

  • Tags: , , , ,

NY: Local man’s child porn case goes to U.S. Supreme Court

Steve Aden: What hath Nebraska wrought?

Canada: Anti-polygamy case gives rise to all kinds of family forms

UK: Inmates are converting to Islam for the perks

Northern Ireland Charity Commission under fire over guidance on “open membership criteria”

Scotland: Pro-lifers’ fury over assisted suicide committee adviser

MA: New team to target civil rights violations

    Boston Globe: “US Attorney Carmen M. Ortiz announced yesterday that she is forming a team of prosecutors to focus on civil rights cases, including hate crimes, human trafficking, police misconduct, damage to religious property, and employment discrimination . . . She made the announcement after the FBI hosted a conference in Boston to educate some 160 law enforcement officials, prosecutors, and community organizations about changes in the federal hate crimes law that expanded it to include protections for gays, lesbians, and transgender people. The law had already been used to prosecute crimes based on race and religion.”


  • Posted: 06/09/2010
  • |
  • Category: Religious Freedom
  • |
  • Source: www.boston.com

  • Tags: , , , ,

“EU commission shows pride in gay rights rulebook”

Canada: BC rights hearing pits same sex couple vs. B&B

North Carolina 7th Graders to Learn About IUDs, Abortifacients, Condoms

“Adopted Children Reject Gay Adoption as ‘Marriage’ Legislation Advances in Argentina”

PTA turns down exhibitor request from ex-gay group

Interfaith marriages are rising fast, but they’re failing fast too

    Washington Post: “According to the General Social Survey, 15 percent of U.S. households were mixed-faith in 1988. That number rose to 25 percent by 2006, and the increase shows no signs of slowing . . . But the effects on the marriages themselves can be tragic — it is an open secret among academics that tsk-tsking grandmothers may be right. According to calculations based on the American Religious Identification Survey of 2001, people who had been in mixed-religion marriages were three times more likely to be divorced or separated than those who were in same-religion marriages.”http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/04/AR2010060402011.html?hpid=opinionsbox1


  • Posted: 06/09/2010
  • |
  • Category: Marriage & Family
  • |
  • Source: www.washingtonpost.com

  • Tags: , , , , ,

The Alien in the White House: The distance between the president and the people is beginning to be revealed.

    Dorothy Rabinowtiz writes at WSJ: “A great part of America now understands that this president’s sense of identification lies elsewhere, and is in profound ways unlike theirs. He is hard put to sound convincingly like the leader of the nation, because he is, at heart and by instinct, the voice mainly of his ideological class. He is the alien in the White House, a matter having nothing to do with delusions about his birthplace cherished by the demented fringe.”


  • Posted: 06/09/2010
  • |
  • Category: Miscellaneous
  • |
  • Source: online.wsj.com

  • Tags: , ,

Split federal appeals court upholds ban on 10 Commandments displays in Ky.

“Are Liberal Judges Really ‘Judicial Activists’?”

Statement from USAID Administrator Dr. Rajiv Shah on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Pride Month

Surprise SC Senate candidate has charge pending – obscenity

DC: Marriage could be issue in straw poll

Sotomayor votes reliably with Supreme Court’s liberal wing

California stem cell research: Were voters duped?

    LA Times: “It has been six years since California voters, awed by Proposition 71′s list of potential cures for cancer, diabetes, heart disease, Alzheimer’s and more than 70 other conditions, approved $3 billion in funding for stem cell research in the state . . . But there have been no ‘miracles’ — no paralyzed people abandoning their wheelchairs or diabetics throwing away their needles. There hasn’t even been a human trial of embryonic stem cells, those amazing shape-shifters that can grow into any cell in the body . . . So were Californians duped?”


  • Posted: 06/09/2010
  • |
  • Category: Sanctity of Life
  • |
  • Source: articles.latimes.com

  • Tags: , , ,

Pro-Life Women Win Big in Tuesday Primary Elections in California, Nevada

Roger Scruton on pessimism and transhumanism

    Roger Scruton writing at New Humanist: “In the world that we are now entering there is a striking new source of false hope, in the ‘trans-humanism’ of people like Ray Kurzweil, Max More and their followers. The transhumanists believe that we will replace ourselves with immortal cyborgs, who will emerge from the discarded shell of humanity like the blessed souls from the grave in some medieval Last Judgement. The transhumanists don’t worry about Huxley’s Brave New World: they don’t believe that the old-fashioned virtues and emotions lamented by Huxley have much of a future in any case. The important thing, they tell us, is the promise of increasing power, increasing scope, increasing ability to vanquish the long-term enemies of mankind, such as disease, ageing, incapacity and death. But to whom are they addressing their argument? If it is addressed to you and me, why should we consider it? Why should we be working for a future in which creatures like us won’t exist, and in which human happiness as we know it will no longer be obtainable? . . . ”


  • Posted: 06/09/2010
  • |
  • Category: Sanctity of Life
  • |
  • Source: newhumanist.org.uk

  • Tags: , , , ,

Marriage debate is about government approval not civil rights violations

“Abortions Via Remote Medicine: Needed Step or Unethical?”

Recent Michigan Prosecutions for “Seducing an Unmarried Woman”

Suit against Bash Back! temporarily on hold while group looks for a new attorney

Pro-Lifers Worry Kagan Could Push Supreme Court on Assisted Suicide

Enfield School Board Votes To Appeal Ruling That Bars Graduations At Church

ACLU Seeks Judgment In Challenge To Sex-Segregation In Kentucky Public School

Group urges end to limits on use of meeting facilities for religious purposes

IN: County may accept legal help in suit

Christian librarian loses suit vs. OSU

Groups support Forsyth in prayer appeal

Cities warned to stop cutting out Christians

Worker demoted for discussing intelligent design

SC Dem upset: Jobless vet to face GOP’s Jim DeMint

2009 charitable giving falls 3.6 percent in U.S.

    AP: “Americans donated $303.75 billion during 2009, the second-worst year since 1956, when the Giving USA Foundation started conducting its surveys. The worst year was 1974, when giving fell an inflation-adjusted 5.5 percent . . . ”


  • Posted: 06/09/2010
  • |
  • Category: Miscellaneous
  • |
  • Source: hosted.ap.org

  • Tags:

Lincoln won with Clinton and anti-union message

Can Public Schools Constitutionally Punish Students’ Off-Campus Speech? The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Will Decide

    Julie Hilden writes at Findlaw: “On June 3rd, an en banc panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit re-heard two First Amendment cases that involve speech by public-school students. In each case, the speech occurred off campus, but it still resulted in the school’s suspending the student involved. The original panel opinions in the two Pennsylvania-based cases — Snyder v. Blue Mountain School Dist., and Layshock v. Hermitage School Dist. — were both issued on February 4th of this year. The positions of the two sides, upon re-hearing, are quite clear. The ACLU, arguing on behalf of the students, contends that speech that occurs outside a public school is also outside the school’s jurisdiction: ‘While children are in school, they are under the custody and tutelage of the school. Once they leave the schoolhouse gate, you’ve got parents that come into play.’ In contrast, the school districts claim that ‘It’s not a matter of where you throw the grenade, it’s where the grenade lands.’ In other words, the districts argue that when students’ speech targets the school, it doesn’t matter whether the speech itself occurs on-campus or off-campus. In this column, I’ll contrast the facts and holdings of the two Third Circuit panel decisions that were issued on February 4th, and comment on the First Amendment issues they raise . . . ”


  • Posted: 06/09/2010
  • |
  • Category: Religious Freedom
  • |
  • Source: writ.news.findlaw.com

  • Tags: , , , , ,

Fiorina wins GOP Senate primary in California

GOP picks NV tea party candidate in Reid battle

Poll: Crist has small lead in Fla. US Senate race

Canada: “9 out of 10 women agree: Sex before marriage is fine”

San Diego Christian lawyers lose bids to be judges

Lincoln survives while Boxer and Reid learn their challengers

Lincoln wins Arkansas runoff

Rockefeller to join GOP to vote against EPA climate rules