CBS: “‘President Obama has spoken out against the law because he thinks that the federal government should be determining immigration policy,’ she said in an interview with an Ecuadorean television station flagged by The Right Scoop. ‘And the Justice Department, under his direction, will be bringing a lawsuit against the act.’”
- Posted: 06/17/2010
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: www.cbsnews.com
- Tags: State: Arizona, Topic: Immigration, Topic: White House
Business Wire: “At its annual meeting this week, the American Medical Association (AMA) voted to support a public health effort by AIDS advocates including the AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF) that would require actors to use condoms during the production of adult films. During the meeting, which was held in Chicago, the AMA’s House of Delegates voted ‘to support legislation to require porn actors to use condoms on-screen.’”
- Posted: 06/17/2010
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: www.businesswire.com
- Tags: Topic: Contraception, Topic: Pornography
Christian Post: “On the closing day of their annual meeting, Southern Baptists approved resolutions denouncing those responsible for the massive gulf oil spill, opposing pro-gay legislations, and lamenting the ‘scandal of Southern Baptist divorce.’ . . . ‘The Bible describes homosexual behavior as both a contributing cause and a consequence of God’s judgment on nations and individuals,’ it states, according to Associated Baptist Press.”
- Posted: 06/17/2010
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: www.christianpost.com
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, Topic: Culture, Topic: Divorce, Topic: Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Military
Casey Maddox writes at the Speak Up Movement Blog (Christian Post Advancing Liberty Blog): “After this morning’s decisions, 4 of the 8 April cases have now been decided. Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Thomas had previously written April opinions. Justice Kennedy announced the Court’s decision today in Quon, the text messaging case. This leaves four cases, including CLS v Martinez, and 5 justices: Roberts, Alito, Scalia, Stevens, and Ginsburg. Notably, Justice Stevens has already issued two opinions from the March sitting (which had 11 cases, one of which was later dismissed as improvidently granted) making him a candidate to sit out April . . . ”
- Posted: 06/17/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: blog.speakupmovement.org
- Tags: ADF: Casey Mattox, ADF: Media Clips, Category: Religious Freedom, Court: U.S. Supreme, ZZ: Christian Legal Society v Martinez
On a daily basis, we receive email alerts from numerous pro-family organizations. Many of these emails contain excellent information. Unfortunately, many of them also fail to provide a web link to the contents of the email. Web links are invaluable to bloggers, reporters, researchers, and others who would like to cite or further report on the material in question. Please include web links to the content in your emails.
- Posted: 06/17/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- Tags: Topic: Internet
ADF attorney David Hacker appeared on the Georgene Rice Show to discuss Idaho’s censorship of the Great Books in charter schools. | MP3 7:18 mins | ADF Media: ADF files appeal over Western Civilization book ban in Idaho public schools, universities
- Posted: 06/17/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.alliancealert.org
- Tags: ADF: David Hacker, ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Multimedia, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, Court: 9th Circuit, State: Idaho, Topic: Charter Schools, Topic: Education, Topic: School Choice, ZZ: Nampa Classical Academy v Goesling
Rasmussen: “A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 72% of Republican voters continue to believe that GOP members of Congress have lost touch with the party base throughout the nation over the past several years . . . Most voters continue to believe it would be better for the country if the majority of Congress is thrown out this November, but they also remain unconvinced that a Republican takeover will make a noticeable difference.”
- Posted: 06/17/2010
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: www.rasmussenreports.com
- Tags: Topic: Culture, Topic: Politics
Providence Journal: “On the eve of the Senate Judiciary Committee’s debate on the McConnell nomination, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce alerted senators that their votes on whether to seat him could become part of the organization’s influential scorecard on members of Congress. . . . The consideration of McConnell’s nomination is playing out against a partisan backdrop. The Providence lawyer, 51, is a longtime state Democratic official, a major contributor to the party and a leading plaintiffs’ lawyer. He has given more than $432,000 to federal election campaigns over the years, including those of Whitehouse and Jack Reed.” | Via Instapundit.
- Posted: 06/17/2010
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: www.projo.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, State: Rhode Island, Topic: Congress, Topic: Nominations, Topic: Politics
Candace Chellew-Hodge writing at Religion Dispatches (a “diversity of progressive voices” on religion): “I thought about Naboth as I read through the transcripts from the Prop 8 closing arguments. Those arguing to keep same-sex marriage illegal in California are like old Naboth—arguing from worn traditions that a growing number of people find ridiculous—if not quaint. A case in point: attorney Charles Cooper, arguing in support of Proposition 8 for the Alliance Defense Fund, who made his entire closing argument from tradition. He told the judge that marriage is intended for procreation and specifically for the control of unintended pregnancies. He argued (seriously) that the state has an interest in marriage between heterosexuals because they have the ability to produce unintended children—so the state has to have a role in making sure those little mistakes are cared for. Gays and lesbians don’t have this problem since they need considerably more than low light and bottle of wine to conceive.”
- Posted: 06/17/2010
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- |
- Source: www.religiondispatches.org
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Category: Marriage and Family, State: California, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Perry v. Brown
CBN: “‘The 7 million voters in California voted for Prop 8,’ said [Jordan Lorence], an attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund. “They made a reasonable, legitimate public policy decision that the Constitution permits, and that the federal judge should just defer to their decision.’” | Video at link.
- Posted: 06/17/2010
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- |
- Source: www.cbn.com
- Tags: ADF: Jordan Lorence, ADF: Media Clips, Category: Marriage and Family, State: California, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Perry v. Brown
NPR: “[Austin Nimocks] of the Alliance Defense Fund, a group opposing gay marriage, said his side remains confident that they made their case. ‘Defending Prop 8 is playing defense,’ Nimocks said. ‘It’s the burden of proof which Judge Walker made abundantly clear that belongs to the plaintiffs to have to prove that Prop 8 is unconstitutional.’”
- Posted: 06/17/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.npr.org
- Tags: ADF: Austin R. Nimocks, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Marriage and Family, State: California, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Perry v. Brown
WorldNetDaily: “‘Censoring classical books, including religious books, does not improve a student’s education; it harms it,’ said ADF Senior Legal Counsel [David Cortman] of the filing this week. ‘A wholesale ban on books with religious content conflicts with established U.S. Supreme Court precedent stating that even “the Bible may constitutionally be used in an appropriate study of history, civilization, ethics, comparative religion, or the like.”‘”
- Posted: 06/17/2010
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- |
- Source: www.wnd.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Category: Religious Freedom, State: Idaho, Topic: Charter Schools, Topic: Education, Topic: School Choice, ZZ: Nampa Classical Academy v Goesling
CitizenLink: “[Austin Nimocks], senior legal counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund, said it boils down to whether we still live in a democracy. ‘(If) a single judge is going to trump the voices of over 7 million Californians who heard both sides of the debate and cast their votes accordingly,’ he said.”
- Posted: 06/17/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.citizenlink.org
- Tags: ADF: Austin R. Nimocks, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Marriage and Family, State: California, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Perry v. Brown
WorldNetDaily: “ADF senior legal counsel [Austin Nimocks] spoke to WND as he left the courtroom today. ‘I think the closing arguments went very well, especially the arguments of Charles Cooper,’ Nimocks said. ‘All the legal bases were covered, and I think he did an excellent job articulating why the voices of more than 7 million Californians, in enacting Prop 8, were constitutional voices with the full entitlement to do exactly what they did.’ . . . U.S. District Court Chief Judge Vaughn Walker is presiding over the case. As WND reported, media outlets have reported Walker is homosexual. . . . Nimocks told WND today, ‘That certainly was not an issue that was raised in the court room.’”
- Posted: 06/17/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.wnd.com
- Tags: ADF: Austin R. Nimocks, ADF: Media Clips, Category: Marriage and Family, Group: Liberty Counsel, State: California, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Perry v. Brown
KFSN (ABC): “‘When the 7 million voters of California voted for Prop 8, they made a reasonable legitimate public policy that the constitution permits, and that the federal judge should just defer to their decision,’ said [Jordan Lorence] with the Alliance Defense Fund. . . . ABC7 legal analyst Dean Johnson was struck by how hard the judge was on the supporters of Prop 8. He asked them repeatedly to cite specific evidence supporting their argument and questioned the validity of their witnesses.”
- Posted: 06/17/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: abclocal.go.com
- Tags: ADF: Jordan Lorence, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Marriage and Family, State: California, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Perry v. Brown
Yahoo! News: “‘The case in Massachusetts is much more incremental and strategic,’ said [Jordan Lorence], a senior counsel with the Alliance Defense Fund, a Christian legal firm helping to defend Prop. 8. ‘It’s like a rifle shot. The California case is much more massive in its magnitude. More than a rifle shot, it’s like a big bomb.’”
- Posted: 06/17/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: news.yahoo.com
- Tags: ADF: Jordan Lorence, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Marriage and Family, Group: Freedom to Marry, Group: Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD), State: California, State: Massachusetts, Topic: Federal DOMA, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Perry v. Brown
WCSH6 (NBC): “Lawyers in the landmark federal trial over the constitutionality of California’s gay marriage ban, Proposition 8, are presenting closing arguments in a San Francisco courtroom Wednesday. . . . ‘What we are hoping that he’s going to end up ruling is that what the 7- million California voters did was a legitimate public policy decision to define marriage as one man and one woman,’ says the Alliance Defense Fund’s [Jordan Lorence].” | Article includes video.
- Posted: 06/17/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.wcsh6.com
- Tags: ADF: Jordan Lorence, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Marriage and Family, State: California, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Perry v. Brown
Homeschooling in Germany and the United States
Aaron T. Martin, Arizona Journal of International & Comparative Law, Vol. 27, No. 1
“This note provides a normative analysis of the constitutional implications of parental choices in education–specifically with regard to homeschooling–in the United States and Germany. This note argues against recent scholarship calling for more State intervention in education and shows how the fundamental right of parents to direct the education of their children must be preserved to further the goals of a liberal democracy. Part One discusses the historical situation of Germany in the 1930s that led to the adoption of compulsory attendance laws. It then moves on to consider Germany’s recent attacks on homeschooling families and the legal battles that have led to civil and criminal sanctions for parents. Part Two considers the constitutional history of parental rights in education in the United States. Part Three discusses the policy debates surrounding homeschooling and implications of policy decisions that may impact both the United States and Germany. There, this note argues that any infringement on parental rights to homeschool is inconsistent with the principles of a robust liberal political democracy. The note concludes by acknowledging the current problems in educational policy as well as future threats to homeschooling in the United States and Germany.”
- Posted: 06/17/2010
- |
- Category: Global: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: www.ajicl.org
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: Germany, Global: Marriage and Family, Topic: Education, Topic: Home School, Topic: Legal Periodicals, Topic: Parental Rights, Topic: School Choice
|
Latest Posts
-
www.adfmedia.org
05/22/2012
University says Christian student club will no longer be forced
to admit non-Christians as leaders, voting members
-
www.catholicculture.org
05/22/2012
Catholic Culture: Italian public opinion remains firmly opposed to same-sex marriage, a new survey shows.
-
www.wnd.com
05/22/2012
WorldNetDaily: As Arizona officials contemplate whether or not Barack Obama’s name will appear on a ballot this year, the state is being flooded with emails from concerned citizens urging the attorney general to make sure the president is constitutionally eligible to hold the office.
|