David French: Overstepping Boundaries: The Supreme Court decides what’s best for Christians

ADF Attorney David French writes at Townhall: “Because of the critical importance of Justice Kennedy’s vote, his brief concurring opinion is arguably the most important opinion in the case, and that opinion contains a poison pill for religious liberty. Reading the entire concurrence, one gets the impression that Justice Kennedy simply did not like the Christian Legal Society at Hastings, viewing its effort to maintain doctrinal fidelity through a statement of faith with extreme suspicion, if not disgust. Kennedy dismisses CLS’s convictions in a single sentence: ‘The era of loyalty oaths is behind us.’”