Supreme Court affirms viewpoint discrimination

Dakota Voice: “[David French] has some helpful light to shed on this odd matter at the National Review. French is a senior counsel at the Alliance Defense Fund and the director of its Center for Academic Freedom, and the ADF was co-counsel for CLS, so he has considerable grasp of the case. He says this decision by the SCOTUS majority ignores an important reality (perhaps all reality?): ‘Distinct student organizations exist at the whim of the majority. If “all comers” can join, then the majority can override the speech of any student group. Thus the true marketplace of ideas exists by the permission (or, more likely, apathy) of the majority.’”