“Yesterday, a Temporary Restraining Order entered against the Louisiana “Ultrasound Before Abortion Act” at the request of New York abortion lawyers was dissolved by order of a federal court judge. Bioethics Defense Fund, a public-interest legal organization that drafted the legislation and provided legal consultation in the court proceedings, applauded the court’s ruling allowing the ultrasound law to into effect immediately.”
- Posted: 08/19/2010
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- Tags: Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: Bioethics Defense Fund, State: Louisiana, Topic: Abortion
Watertown Daily Times: “The Justice Department has filed motion in U.S. District Court to participate in the case as an ‘amicus curiae,’ or friend of the court, essentially volunteering to help the court decide whether federal discrimination claims by former student Charles P. Pratt should be upheld. Mr. Pratt, who filed suit in April 2009, alleged he was harassed, called names, physically assaulted and threatened . . . Mr. Pratt claims that district officials were aware of the problems but deliberately refused to help him. He also said any attempts by him to form a Gay-Straight Alliance at the high school were shot down by administrators.”
- Posted: 08/19/2010
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: www.watertowndailytimes.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Group: Gay-Straight Alliance, Group: Lambda Legal, State: New York, Topic: Department of Justice (DOJ), Topic: Education, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, ZZ: Pratt v. Indian River Central School District
CNN: “The trend is similar abroad, especially among younger people, said Suzanne Goldberg, a Columbia University law professor who heads the Center for Gender and Sexuality Law. The center has handled asylum cases for gay people fleeing persecution in countries including Jamaica, Brazil, Uzbekistan and Ivory Coast. Research indicates younger people are beginning to see sexual orientation as ‘benign variation, so that the differences between gay and nongay couples are simply not so interesting,’ Goldberg said in an e-mail.”
- Posted: 08/19/2010
- |
- Category: Global: Marriage and Family
- |
- Source: www.cnn.com
- Tags: Category: Global, Global: Marriage and Family, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Studies, ZZ: Perry v. Brown
FedBizOpps.gov: “The Federal Bureau of Prisons, FPC Duluth, Duluth, MN, intends to make a single award to a responsible entity for providing the services of Native American Medicine man to the inmate population as outlined in the statement of work . . . The contractor will conduct Native American ceremonies and provide instruction to inmates in the Native American Faith.” (read the job description at the link)
- Posted: 08/19/2010
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: www.fbo.gov
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom
Wall Street Journal: “Wisconsin is pushing to expand a controversial program that uses federal Medicaid funds to provide free birth-control pills, vasectomies and other forms of contraception to low-income people, an effort made possible by the federal health-care overhaul . . . Where funding previously was conditional and states had to reapply regularly, a provision in the health-care law allows states to make their plans permanent and get federal funding faster. Wisconsin applied in June to raise the qualifying limit to $32,490—a move that would expand the program’s reach.”
- Posted: 08/19/2010
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- |
- Source: online.wsj.com
- Tags: Category: Sanctity of Life, State: Wisconsin, Topic: Contraception
“[T]he goal seems to be to shame and stigmatize one’s opponents as part of a “war of position” over which message will dominate mass media, the schools, and other institutions that govern cultural reproduction. Those who embrace this strategy, implicitly or explicitly, can justify it to themselves pretty easily by defining their opponents as irrational or subrational Nazi-like hate-mongers. This might be the most effective strategy for people who want to change the culture.”
- Posted: 08/19/2010
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, Topic: Immigration, Topic: Islam, Topic: Politics
Maggie Gallagher writing at Real Clear Politics: “[T]he devastating brief that attorney Charles Cooper filed asking the 9th Circuit to overrule Walker . . . is a total smack-down of Walker’s decision to ignore the immense amount of evidence brought to him — not to dispute it, but to simply ignore it. Walker tried to pretend, in essence, that the only form of evidence a trial judge may consider is expert witness testimony in court. He even ignored expert witness testimony when it clashed with his own views. Harvard professor Nancy Cott, a historian of marriage, favors gay marriage, but even she freely admitted in trial that gay marriage represented a momentous change in the public meaning of marriage, and that the effects of this change would be impossible to determine in advance.”
- Posted: 08/19/2010
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: www.realclearpolitics.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Court: 9th Circuit, Group: National Organization for Marriage (NOM), State: California, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Perry v. Brown
PR Newswire: “Responding to a series of incidents in which individuals in four counties in Illinois have been charged with violating Illinois’ eavesdropping law for making audio recordings of public conversations with police, the American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois today asked a federal court to rule that the First Amendment bans such prosecutions.”
- Posted: 08/19/2010
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: www.prnewswire.com
- Tags: Group: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
Ilya Somin writing at The Volokh Conspiracy: “Traditionally, conservative scholars and judges have advocated narrow views of constitutional ‘standing’: the level of ‘interest’ litigants must have at stake in the outcome of a case in order to give them a legal right to sue. For their part, liberals have usually promoted the opposite view: constitutional rights should not be denied based on these sorts of technicalities . . . [I]t is more likely that views on standing will no longer closely track ideological divisions. Nothing about conservative ideology as such necessarily requires narrow standing rules, and nothing about liberal ideology necessarily requires broad ones.”
- Posted: 08/19/2010
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: volokh.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Topic: Jurisprudence, ZZ: Perry v. Brown
Ilya Somin writing at The Volokh Conspiracy: “I briefly explain my view that ‘constitutional’ standing requirements are both a bad idea and not required by the Constitution. Right from the start, I should emphasize that my argument only applies against claims that the Constitution imposes strict standing requirements on litigants who want to file a lawsuit arguing that some government action is unconstitutional. I don’t deny that Congress has the power to impose standing requirements for litigants who want to file suits under a federal statute; Congress can even enact statutes under which no private individuals have any right to sue at all.”
- Posted: 08/19/2010
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: volokh.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Topic: Jurisprudence
Law.com: “‘ . . . ‘I think there are two explanations, and one is dominant,’ Bolick suggested for the influx of Arizona cases. ‘Arizona is taking the concept of states being the laboratories of democracy very seriously on multiple fronts . . . We have a legislature that is risk-taking and innovative . . . The second “less significant reason, but nonetheless still very significant reason” is that Arizona resides in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, said Bolick.’ . . . The Institute, which has an Arizona affiliate, is representing not only the Arizona Freedom Club PAC in the campaign finance case, but also is involved in the school choice tax credit case — Arizona Christian Tuition Organization v. Winn (combined with Garriott v. Winn).”
- Posted: 08/19/2010
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: www.law.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Court: 9th Circuit, Court: U.S. Supreme, Group: Goldwater Institute, Group: Institute for Justice, State: Arizona, ZZ: Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn, ZZ: Garriott v. Winn
Religion Clause: “New York’s General Business Law, Sec. 11, prohibits service of process in civil cases on Sundays. However in Carbon Capital Management, LLC v American Express Co., (Sup. Ct. NY Nassau, July 29, 2010), a New York trial court upheld the validity of service on Sunday on the concierge in defendant’s apartment builiding.”
- Posted: 08/19/2010
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: religionclause.blogspot.com
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, State: New York, Topic: Sabbath, ZZ: Carbon Capital Management LLC v American Express Co.
Associated Press: “New members, especially those from the majority party eager to fulfill their election promises, typically complain about the slow pace of the Senate. But with partisanship pushing the Senate toward petrification, some newcomers are seeking fundamental changes in the way the Senate operates. Getting their more senior colleagues to go along will not be easy.”
- Posted: 08/19/2010
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: hosted.ap.org
- Tags: Topic: Congress, Topic: Politics
The Salt Lake Tribune: “[Byron Babione], the attorney representing the UHPA, said the individualized memorials ‘simply do not amount to a government establishment of religion’ . . . ‘We don’t intend to leave this disappointing ruling standing,’ said Babione, senior legal counsel of the Alliance Defense Fund in Arizona. “One atheist group’s agenda shouldn’t diminish the sacrifice made by Utah Highway Patrol officers and their families. The families of the fallen should be allowed to honor their loved ones as they wish.’” | ADF News Release
- Posted: 08/19/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.sltrib.com
- Tags: ADF: Byron Babione, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, Court: 10th Circuit, Group: Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Group: Becket Fund, Group: National Legal Foundation, State: Utah, ZZ: American Atheists v. Davenport
SonoranNews.com: “Representing the proponents of Prop. 8, Attorney [Brian Raum] of the Alliance Defense Fund issued a statement afterward calling the court’s ruling ‘disappointing’ and said, ‘Its impact could be devastating to marriage and the democratic process.’ He said the majority of voters ‘simply wished to preserve the historic definition of marriage . . . imagine what would happen if every state constitutional amendment could be eliminated by small groups of wealthy activists who malign the intent of the people. It would no longer be America, but a tyranny of elitists.’”
- Posted: 08/19/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- Tags: ADF: Brian Raum, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Marriage and Family, Court: 9th Circuit, State: California, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Perry v. Brown
Heritage Foundation Foundry Blog: “Responding to a question about Social Security, the President insisted: ‘So here’s the thing. Social Security is not in crisis.’ Oh yes it is. The debate about whether Social Security needs to be fixed is over . . . And Social Security is just one of the Big Three entitlements (Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid) that is set to bankrupt our country. Unless major reforms are made . . . ”
- Posted: 08/19/2010
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: blog.heritage.org
- Tags: Topic: Economy
Maggie Gallagher writes at Townhall: “When you read the devastating brief that attorney Charles Cooper filed asking the 9th Circuit to overrule Walker, it’s not hard to see why. It is a total smack-down of Walker’s decision to ignore the immense amount of evidence brought to him — not to dispute it, but to simply ignore it . . . To give you an example of how extreme Walker is, he ruled that orientation is a protected class subject to strict scrutiny — ignoring no less than 10 higher-court decisions to the contrary.”
- Posted: 08/19/2010
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: townhall.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Category: Marriage and Family, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage
Thomas Sowell writes at Townhall: “How much does our own administration in Washington care about the American people and their national security? This is not a question you would usually have to ask about any administration of either party. But this is not like any other administration, and Barack Obama is unlike any other President of the United States in having come from a background of decades of associations and alliances with people who resent this country and its people.”
- Posted: 08/19/2010
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: townhall.com
- Tags: Topic: Military, Topic: White House
|
Latest Posts
-
www.adfmedia.org
05/22/2012
University says Christian student club will no longer be forced
to admit non-Christians as leaders, voting members
-
www.catholicculture.org
05/22/2012
Catholic Culture: Italian public opinion remains firmly opposed to same-sex marriage, a new survey shows.
-
www.wnd.com
05/22/2012
WorldNetDaily: As Arizona officials contemplate whether or not Barack Obama’s name will appear on a ballot this year, the state is being flooded with emails from concerned citizens urging the attorney general to make sure the president is constitutionally eligible to hold the office.
|