Kevin Theriot: North Korea: Is this where our country is headed?

Pro-life group lobbies Perdue on UNC health plan

Thomas More Society testifies against “telemed abortions” in Iowa

Fight is on over Arizona ‘Raza studies’ restrictions

Fla. church vows to burn Qurans on 9/11, despite fire dept. objection

St. Petersburg authorities issue warning to lawyer for establishing sharia court

Are the culture wars over?

Some construction workers refuse to build mosque

Same-sex “marriage” surprise issue in Australian election

Bring back Atlantic City as a beach resort: poll

“Gay marriage slowly gaining” — younger generation believes it is a lifestyle choice not genetic

    Forbes: “There is one surprising area where young people differ from their elders about homosexuality. Since the pollsters started asking about it in the late 1977, the number saying homosexuality is something one is born with has been growing. But today, more young people than older ones believe it is a lifestyle choice. In May 50% of 18-29 year olds told CBS News pollsters that being homosexual is something people choose to be; 47% said it was something a person couldn’t change. Among those 65 and over, however, 25% said it was a choice, 55% said it was something that couldn’t be changed.”


  • Posted: 08/20/2010
  • |
  • Category: Marriage & Family
  • |
  • Source: www.forbes.com

  • Tags: , , ,

RI: ACLU, parents challenge uniform dress code

The Becket Fund stands up (to ACLU) for Catholic hospitals

New developments in GLAD’s DOMA challenge

Richard Epstein: No crosses for dead troopers? The dictatorial impulse returns

    Richard Epstein writing at Ricochet: “The general laws that deal with the separation of church and state take Jefferson’s metaphor and apply it with a ruthless insensitivity to all sorts of places where it does not belong. One would never say that the use of crosses in Arlington cemetery creates an establishment of religion because there are relatively few Jewish stars. There would be a legitimate beef in this case if Utah took it upon itself to allow only crosses and to prohibit all other religious insignias for Jewish or Moslem leaders . . . This decision in my mind falls abjectly short of the modicum of common sense that we have a right to respect from our judges.”


  • Posted: 08/20/2010
  • |
  • Category: Religious Freedom

  • Tags: , , ,

ACLU seeks race, ethnic data due to “Muslim mapping” fears

    Valley News: “The American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California recently asked the FBI to release records related to the agency’s collection of race and ethnic data in the Southland. The request is one of 30 coordinated Freedom of Information Act filings by ACLU affiliates in states and the District of Columbia seeking records from FBI field offices related to the ‘mapping’ of ethnic communities.”


  • Posted: 08/20/2010
  • |
  • Category: Religious Freedom
  • |
  • Source: www.myvalleynews.com

  • Tags: ,

5 reasons not to take college rankings seriously

    The Consumerist: “1. College rankings are often based on opinion and not actual data . . . 2. Rankings can be based on factors that have no demonstrated impact on academic results . . . 3. The benefits of attending a more selective college might very well be canceled out by the benefits of attending a less selective college . . . 4. Rankings that look at career earnings fail to consider the aptitudes of students . . . 5. Real experts — as opposed to people trying to sell magazines full of car ads — who look into this stuff have realized you can’t compare colleges in any meaningful way.”


  • Posted: 08/20/2010
  • |
  • Category: Miscellaneous
  • |
  • Source: consumerist.com

  • Tags:

Rejection of “gay” adoption is not a matter of tolerance, asserts Mexican archbishop

NYC mosque leader: We won’t change the course

New York City Bar speaks in support of Ground Zero Mosque

Moving the middle on marriage

    Lanae Erickson and Jon Cowan writing at Politico: “First, advocates must reframe the conversation . . . Marriage is about lifetime commitment, responsibilities and obligations. If we can persuade people in the middle that gay couples want to get married for those reasons — not simply to gain a list of legal rights and benefits — we’ll connect with them in a far deeper way . . . In their ads, opponents of same-sex marriage tapped into fears about children, triggering concerns about what allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry would mean for kids. If we’re going to move the middle, we need to figure out how to quell these fears, rather than ignoring or dismissing them . . . Third, we need to continue to make progress along the spectrum of relationship recognition, from domestic partnerships to civil unions to marriage.”


  • Posted: 08/20/2010
  • |
  • Category: Marriage & Family
  • |
  • Source: www.politico.com

  • Tags: , ,

DNC targets McCain on DADT

WI: Lawsuit challenges state’s domestic partner registry

Iowa GOP condemns candidate’s “anti-gay” comments

Newsweek: Life without gender?

Brazilian presidential candidate: Abortion should be available to women “in despair”

“Fla. primary could yield gay milestones”

“The gaying of CT politics”

Pentagon to send DADT surveys to spouses of servicemembers

“Gays” take aim at Target through shareholders

The new battle: What it means to be American

    Politico: “It’s a classic case of be careful what you wish for. President Barack Obama wanted to end the baby boomer-era culture wars — and he’s done it. But along the way, Obama has sparked an even more visceral values debate about whether he’s moving the country toward socialism and over the very definition of what it means to be American . . . ‘He grew up more as a globalist than an American,’ Huckabee said. ‘To deny American exceptionalism is in essence to deny the heart and soul of this nation.’”


  • Posted: 08/20/2010
  • |
  • Category: Miscellaneous
  • |
  • Source: www.politico.com

  • Tags: ,

82% say voters should be required to show photo ID

Operation Rescue to fight remote abortions

Filipino Archbishop: Proposed divorce bill “will destroy society”

CA: Assembly passes Civil Marriage Religious Freedom Act

Ireland: Time to remove the Angelus from public broadcasts after 60 years?

    BBC: “News bulletins must wait until a minute past the hour to allow for the devotional Catholic prayer, recited in memory of the Incarnation of Jesus. The bells have been a regular feature of state broadcaster RTE’s schedule since August 1950 – when they were introduced to mark the Catholic Holy Year . . . Another criticism of the Angelus broadcast is that it is by its very nature Catholic, and therefore excludes other faiths, a criticism that Ali Selim doesn’t take on board . . . The debate about the Angelus in Ireland then, is not necessarily a debate between religions as to whether or not broadcasting the Angelus bells is appropriate. It’s part of a wider debate on what kind of society Ireland should be – a secular or a religious one.”


  • Posted: 08/20/2010
  • |
  • Category: Global: Religious Freedom
  • |
  • Source: www.bbc.co.uk

  • Tags: , , , ,

UK: Illegal porn being sold in local corner shops

UK: Civil partnerships plummet as dissolutions double

UK: Govt-funded group sponsors Irish “gay” adoption push

UK: Council offices given to homosexual activist

Philosopher: To defeat same-sex “marriage” conservatives must defend traditional sexual morals

Pro-life groups agree Nebraska AG right to back down on abortion screenings law

Obama Administration stonewalls full release of major abstinence study

A dozen reasons the wealthy give

AP to reporters: No more references to “Ground Zero mosque”

    AP Advisory: “We should continue to avoid the phrase ‘ground zero mosque’ or ‘mosque at ground zero’ on all platforms. (We’ve very rarely used this wording, except in slugs, though we sometimes see other news sources using the term.) The site of the proposed Islamic center and mosque is not at ground zero, but two blocks away in a busy commercial area. We should continue to say it’s ‘near’ ground zero, or two blocks away.”


  • Posted: 08/20/2010
  • |
  • Category: Religious Freedom
  • |
  • Source: www.ap.org

  • Tags: , , ,

EEOC sues alleging religious discrimination lawsuit against NC company over Saturday work

New urgent care clinic at St. Vincent’s in religious hangup over birth control

NPR: In Tenn., mosque location isn’t the issue: religion is

    NPR: “A new Islamic center is going up near Nashville, Tenn., and as in New York, the proposal has fractured the community along a divide over religious freedom . . . [M]ost of the people rallying against the mosque, like Ben Fletcher, have a different argument. ‘We’re Christians and this religion represents people that are against Christians. That’s something we need to look at, you know, because you’re going to have a lot of trouble down the line,’ Fletcher says.”


  • Posted: 08/20/2010
  • |
  • Category: Religious Freedom
  • |
  • Source: www.npr.org

  • Tags: , , ,

NJ: Hatikvah Charter School exposes East Brunswick lawsuit

More losing faith in mosque: poll

R.J. Snell: Universities and loss of civility

    R.J. Snell writing at Public Discourse: “[T]he utilitarian education of the new university views the cosmos (and its citizens) as brute, factical, as merely given—what Charles Taylor calls the ‘great disembedding.’ The cosmos is mere stuff—indifferent and valueless until it is found useful and assigned a task. Lacking a sense of the gratuity of being, such education lacks also commitment to the worth of being; lacking a sense of the worth of being, such education lacks also commitment to acting only in conformity with the dignity of things; lacking a sense of the dignity of things, such education lacks also commitment to civility and the teaching thereof.”


  • Posted: 08/20/2010
  • |
  • Category: Marriage & Family
  • |
  • Source: www.thepublicdiscourse.com

  • Tags: , ,

Palin to AP: It’s “Ground Zero mosque”

TN: Court refuses to issue preliminary injunction against University’s speaker rules

IL: City incurs high legal fees battling Hindu woman over assessment to remove tree

    WLS-AM 890: “A family’s steadfast refusal to pay a $635.02 special assessment tax for an alley paving project because it violated their religious beliefs has run up an estimated $40,000 in outside legal bills for north suburban Evanston, with no apparent end in sight . . . Rao and her mother fought removal of a tree in the project, saying the action ran counter to the basic precepts of their Hindu religion. Hinduism forbids the needless killing of any living thing and also requires practitioners from not participating or acquiescing in such acts, Rao said.” | Via Religion Clause


  • Posted: 08/20/2010
  • |
  • Category: Religious Freedom
  • |
  • Source: www.wlsam.com

  • Tags: , ,

Somali Islamists seize and burn aid food

White House Press Gaggle: “The President obviously is Christian”

Kennedy favors civilian courts in terrorism cases

Opposition to Afghanistan conflict not just a liberal issue anymore

Appeals court favors atheists’ argument, ADF to appeal

“Gay rights foes argue Wisconsin’s partnership law like marriage”

Reuters study: U.S. church-run hospitals provide higher quality care

    Reuters: “Catholic and other church-owned systems are significantly more likely to provide higher quality performance and efficiency to the communities served than investor-owned systems, according to a Thomson Reuters analysis of the quality performance of 255 health systems in the United States.”


  • Posted: 08/20/2010
  • |
  • Category: Miscellaneous
  • |
  • Source: blogs.reuters.com

  • Tags:

Fox News Video: Byron Babione discusses 10th Circuit’s trooper roadside memorials ruling

Why Glenn Beck is wrong about legalizing “homosexual marriage”

GOP consultant: Mosque will “train and recruit” future terrorists

John Esposito: “Will Muslims impose sharia?”

    John Esposito, Professor of religion, international affairs and Islamic studies, writing at The Washington Post / On Faith: “. . . So what about the role of Shariah today for Muslims living in non-Muslim societies like the U.S or European countries? . . . A common ground for reformers is to recognize the difference between the binding nature of two broad divisions Islamic law: personal and public, rules governing strictly ‘religious’ observances (such as prayer, fasting, and pilgrimage) and civil/criminal transactions (some regulations re marriage, divorce, inheritance, crimes and punishments, and issues of war and peace). The former is believed to be binding on all Muslims and unchanging; much of the latter, many of whose regulations are based upon human reasoning and deductions in specific early historical contexts, is capable of readjustment in light of new historical and social contexts and circumstances.”


  • Posted: 08/20/2010
  • |
  • Category: Religious Freedom
  • |
  • Source: newsweek.washingtonpost.com

  • Tags: , , ,

ABA advocates federal legalization of “homosexual marriage”

Court says crosses along Utah highways must go

Utah crosses ruled unconstitutional

PA Supreme Court: Conscious, non-terminal people with disabilities cannot be denied life-preserving treatment

Leaving Big Law Behind

    Jill Priluck writes at Slate: “As the Big Law model—in which the nation’s largest law firms turn the top law students into billable-hour-crazed associates and, sometimes, partners—evolves to accommodate global entities, companies below the $100 million-revenue level that can’t or don’t want to pay Big Law rates are being squeezed. And this presents a window for partners, fed up with the Big Law model, to strike out on their own.  The field is rife with upheaval.”


  • Posted: 08/20/2010
  • |
  • Category: Bench & Bar
  • |
  • Source: www.slate.com

  • Tags: ,

Law Review: Building a Framework for Escaping the Confines of Domestic Church-State Jurisprudence

    “This Article seeks to provide that clarity by comprehensively analyzing whether and to what extent the Establishment Clause applies abroad. Part I examines the practical significance of applying the Establishment Clause abroad. Part I.A discusses the relationship between religion and national security, and explores in particular how conflict-prone Islamic states threaten American security, either through terrorism or internal war. Part I.B then summarizes various United States policies that use Islam to democratize and demilitarize these conflict-prone Islamic states. Part II examines various proposed approaches to applying the Establishment Clause abroad, and points out some of the deficiencies in these approaches – most importantly their variation from the U.S. Supreme Court’s cases on how other constitutional provisions apply abroad. After Part III.A discusses the over 100 years of jurisprudence on the Constitution’s transnational applicability, Part III.B derives from this jurisprudence a formal framework for applying constitutional rights abroad. Finally, Part IV.A extends this framework to the Establishment Clause, and Part IV.B uses this analysis to speculate how courts might adjudicate current United States programs promoting religion abroad.”


  • Posted: 08/20/2010
  • |
  • Category: Global: Religious Freedom
  • |
  • Source: works.bepress.com

  • Tags: , , ,

Law Review: Why Roe v. Wade will not be overruled

    Men Come and Go, but Roe Abides: Why Roe v. Wade Will Not Be Overruled
    Anthony Dutra, 90 B.U. L. Rev. 1261 (2010)

    “Legally, the abortion issue implicates the precarious tightrope walk between constitutionally guaranteed rights and the rights of states in our federalist governmental structure. Since the day the Court handed it down, Roe has engendered scathing criticism and much academic debate. In the wake of major Supreme Court decisions on abortion rights and restrictions, scholars on both sides of the debate analyze the decision and articulate strategies for the future. Others write from an eschatological perspective and attempt to map out what the legal landscape for abortion would be if Roe were overruled. Even if Roe were to be overruled, state constitutional and statutory law, if unchanged, would provide most women with a general right to choose to terminate their pregnancies.”


  • Posted: 08/20/2010
  • |
  • Category: Sanctity of Life
  • |
  • Source: www.bu.edu

  • Tags: , ,

Law Review: “Assisted Suicide, Morality and Law: Why Prohibiting Assisted Suicide Violates the Establishment Clause”

    Edward L. Rubin, Assisted Suicide, Morality and Law: Why Prohibiting Assisted Suicide Violates the Establishment Clause (February 2, 2010). Vanderbilt Law Review, 2010; Vanderbilt Public Law Research Paper No. 10-02. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1546648

    “Laws that criminalize assisted suicide should be struck down under the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause. These laws fail the secular purpose strand of the Lemon test and the anti-coercion strand that Lee v. Wiseman established under the accommodation test. While it is true that laws against assisted suicide don’t involve performance of a religious ritual, they codify a highly specific interpretation of Christian doctrine. This article uses an historical analysis to demonstrate that prohibitions against suicide and assisted suicide emerged from a conception of Christianity that defined actions as moral only if they served a higher purpose. In the modern world, this conception has been replaced by a rival morality centered on individual self-fulfillment, which accepts rather than condemns an individual’s decision to end his or her life under certain circumstances. The advent of the new morality clarifies the specificity of the prior morality and highlights its religious origin. Based on this analysis, it seems clear that according to an historically and contextually established definition of religion in our contemporary society (the only defensible type of definition) laws against assisted suicide are efforts to compel obedience to a particular religious ideology, and should be struck down on that basis.”


  • Posted: 08/20/2010
  • |
  • Category: Religious Freedom
  • |
  • Source: ssrn.com

  • Tags: , , , ,