Eugene Volokh writing at The Volokh Conspiracy: “Josh Blackman has video, liveblogging, and my PowerPoint presentation. The panelists were Notre Dame Prof. Rick Garnett, the Alliance Defense Fund’s [Jordan Lorence], Paul Smith (the lawyer in this case for the Hastings gay student group), and me; Judge Bill Pryor of the Eleventh Circuit moderated. I much enjoyed the panel, and hope the audience did, too.”
- Posted: 11/19/2010
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: volokh.com
- Tags: ADF: Jordan Lorence, ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Multimedia, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, Topic: Colleges, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, ZZ: Christian Legal Society v Martinez
Iona Institute: “Religious people far more charitable than their non-religious counterparts, according to a new study. The research, carried out by leading academic Dr Robert Putnam and David E. Campbell, lecturer in political science at the University of Notre Dame found that, while secular Americans tended to be somewhat more tolerant, religious people were much more likely to be help the poor and the elderly.”
- Posted: 11/19/2010
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: www.ionainstitute.org
- Tags: Topic: Culture, Topic: Studies
Metro News: “The fate of a Carleton University anti-abortion group remains in limbo while the university’s student association considers reversing a ban on pro-life student clubs . . . Though the deadline has passed, members of the association have introduced a motion to amend the policy and allow pro-life groups to register as clubs. A vote on the proposed change is planned for December, meaning the group could be reinstated, says Khaldoon Bushnaq, a spokesman for the association.”
Related:
Canada: Carleton University Student Association seeks to ban pro-life groups
- Posted: 11/19/2010
- |
- Category: Global: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: www.metronews.ca
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: Canada, Global: Religious Freedom, Global: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Colleges, Topic: Education
“‘There’s more than 60 senators, I’m convinced, who are prepared to vote for this bill, including Don’t Ask Don’t Tell,’ Sen. Joe Lieberman, an independent who is voting with Democrats on this issue, said in a press conference Thursday morning.”
- Posted: 11/19/2010
- |
- Category: Featured
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Topic: Congress, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Military, Topic: Politics
The Star-Ledger: “The Pew Research Center’s latest survey did turn up that growing perception of marriage’s obsolescence. It neglected, however, to ask people what they felt about it . . . It turns out Americans love marriage. They hope to marry, and most eventually will. Those who called marriage obsolete may be voicing a fear, not expressing a wish, says David Popenoe, the former Rutgers sociology professor and co-director of the National Marriage Project.” | More information in yesterday’s headlines in the ADF Alliance Alert
- Posted: 11/19/2010
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Topic: Culture, Topic: Marriage, Topic: Studies
Wall Street Journal: “Fewer new businesses are getting off the ground in the U.S., available data suggest, a development that could cloud the prospects for job growth and innovation . . . The number of companies with at least one employee fell by 100,000, or 2%, in the year that ended March 31, the Labor Department reported Thursday.”
- Posted: 11/19/2010
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: online.wsj.com
- Tags: Topic: Economy
David W. Virtue writing at Virtue Online: “There is something entirely disingenuous about the bishop’s claims. Whatever ‘toll’ or ‘strain’ he is talking about is entirely self-induced, if not self-inflicted. No one said he had to come out. No one said he had to run for bishop though he tried in three dioceses before he hit pay dirt in New Hampshire . . . Among his legacies will be the formation of the Anglican Church in North America (ACNA). Robinson may take pride in the fact that over 100,000 former Episcopalians and some 900 churches have absconded from TEC forcing the national church and four dioceses to spend millions of dollars defending their right to properties.”
- Posted: 11/19/2010
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: www.virtueonline.org
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Topic: Churches, Topic: Culture, Topic: Homosexual Agenda
James C. Capretta writing at Public Discourse: “Richard Stith, a pro-life law professor at Valparaiso University, is urging his fellow pro-lifers to stay off the ‘repeal and replace’ bandwagon. In an article for First Things online, he has suggested that a more promising approach for pro-lifers is amending the new law with clear pro-life language . . . No one suggests that all pro-lifers must adhere to this kind of thinking and support ‘repeal and replace.’ But, at the same time, it should not be expected that all pro-lifers will be satisfied with adding a Hyde-like amendment to what has already been passed.”
- Posted: 11/19/2010
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- Tags: Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Congress, Topic: Insurance
Washington Times: “Note to terrorists: Next time, wear a hijab. The Department of Homeland Security reportedly is giving special exemptions to their “enhanced pat-down” policy to Muslim women wearing the hijab or other form-concealing garments. Last week, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) issued a ‘travel advisory’ noting that women who are patted down ‘should remind the TSA officer that they are only supposed to pat down the area in question, in this scenario, your head and neck.’”
- Posted: 11/19/2010
- |
- Category: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: www.washingtontimes.com
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, Topic: Islam, Topic: Pornography
The Hill: “Reid will force a vote on extending tax cuts for families earning below $250,000 and individuals below $200,000 that would allow tax rates on the wealthy to expire. But it’s not clear whether that vote will be on a permanent or temporary extension because of a split in the Democratic caucus, a notable change since the election.”
- Posted: 11/19/2010
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: thehill.com
- Tags: Topic: Congress, Topic: Economy, Topic: Politics
SCOTUSblog: “The Ninth Circuit Court agreed on Wednesday to allow live and delayed broadcasting of the Dec. 6 oral argument on the constitutionality of Proposition 8 — California’s ban on same-sex marriage. In a brief order, the Court cleared live broadcasting by C-SPAN, the cable network. It also gave permission to a San Francisco station, KGO-TV, an ABC affiliate, to provide coverage.”
- Posted: 11/19/2010
- |
- Category: Featured
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, State: California, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, Topic: Media, ZZ: Case Filings, ZZ: Perry v. Brown
Adam Liptak writing in the New York Times: “The Supreme Court under the leadership of Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. is often criticized for issuing sweeping and politically polarized decisions. But there is an emerging parallel critique as well, this one concerned with the quality of the court’s judicial craftsmanship. In decisions on questions great and small, the court often provides only limited or ambiguous guidance to lower courts.”
Orin Kerr responds at The Volokh Conspiracy: “No matter what Supreme Court opinions look like, there will always be someone who criticizes them for not being clear enough . . . In my experience, judges and lawyers in the lower courts know exactly what to do with concurrences in Supreme Court opinions that don’t provide the crucial vote. For the most part they just ignore them, unless the concurrences happen to have some language that the lawyer or judge needs to support the argument they’re making anyway.”
- Posted: 11/19/2010
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Court: U.S. Supreme, Topic: Jurisprudence
Americans United for Separation of Church and State / The Wall of Separation: “ADF lawyers, however, just couldn’t let the matter go. They insisted that university officials had been guilty of selective enforcement – in other words, that the school had imposed the ‘no-discrimination’ policy on the CLS chapter while letting other groups get away with it . . . On Wednesday, a federal appeals court tossed out that claim as well. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said it was too late for CLS to raise that claim since the group hadn’t brought it up before.”
- Posted: 11/19/2010
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Category: Religious Freedom, Group: Americans United for Separation of Church and State, State: California, Topic: Colleges, ZZ: Christian Legal Society v Martinez, ZZ: Christian Legal Society v Wu
Iowa Independent: “Five out-of-state organizations spent $948,355 . . . Arizona-based Alliance Defense Fund and one of its affiliates, the Texas-based Liberty Institute, offered free legal representation to any church who openly violated federal tax law by advocating for the removal of the judges from the pulpit. Federal tax law forbids 501(c)3 organizations, including churches, from intervening in elections in support of or opposition to any candidate.”
- Posted: 11/19/2010
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Category: Bench and Bar, Group: American Family Association (AFA), Group: Family Research Council (FRC), Group: Liberty Institute, Group: National Organization for Marriage (NOM), State: Iowa, Topic: Elections, Topic: Homosexual Agenda
DOMA and the Constitution
Mark P. Strasser, 58 Drake L. Rev. 1011 (2010)
“Part II of this Article addresses some of the constitutional issues implicated in the full faith and credit provision and discusses some of the different possible constructions of the provision and the ways that these different constructions would make the provision more or less vulnerable to constitutional attack. Part III analyzes some of the special constitutional difficulties associated with the provision defining marriage for federal purposes. The Article concludes that DOMA is vulnerable on a number of grounds, some peculiar to the jurisprudence associated with the substance of the respective provisions and others that might invalidate both provisions. While it is not clear whether the Supreme Court will ultimately hear a constitutional challenge to DOMA or, if so, how the Court will rule, it is clear that the analysis offered by the Court will likely have important implications for individuals’ rights and for state and congressional powers.”
- Posted: 11/19/2010
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Topic: Federal DOMA, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Legal Periodicals, Topic: Marriage
Stemming Sexting: Sensible Legal Approaches to Teenagers’ Exchange of Self-Produced Pornography
Elizabeth C. Eraker, 25 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 555 (2010)
“The term sexting often describes a broad range of behaviors that differ radically in terms of the actors, motivations, and tactics involved. In this Note, the term ‘sexting’ refers to the self-production and distribution by cell phone of sexually explicit images in the course of consensual, voluntary activity by teenagers. This definition describes a phenomenon differing from the use of texting by sexual predators to exploit youth, a set of issues that is not addressed here, and the use of sexting to cyberbully. This Note focuses primarily on the typical sexting case involving the limited exchange of provocative messages concerning consensual sexual activity between willing participants.
The prevalence of sexting and the severity of its consequences have prompted state and federal policymakers to consider various legislative proposals, from crafting new criminal offenses to introducing educational programs. In exploring appropriate legal responses to sexting, this Note attempts to strike a balance between competing policy objectives, such as teenage privacy and the state’s interest in preventing child sexual abuse and child pornography, while respecting the extent to which the digital revolution changed how teenagers communicate and interact in social spaces. While society may want to minimize teenagers’ production and distribution of provocative images even under consensual and private circumstances, sexting should be exempt from treatment under child pornography statutes. In Part I, this Note explores the sexting phenomenon and its underlying causes in the context of a digital generation of teenagers. Part II surveys the varied responses of authorities to sexting incidents, including prosecutors and state legislators. Part III discusses the range of policy issues implicated in designing an appropriate legal framework to address sexting. Part IV concludes by suggesting several legislative components that could help authorities discipline the harms of sexting without resorting to ill-suited child pornography statutes.”
- Posted: 11/19/2010
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: www.btlj.org
- Tags: Topic: Child Pornography, Topic: Legal Periodicals, Topic: Pornography, Topic: Sexting
Same-Sex Second-Parent Adoption and Intestacy Law: Applying the Sharon S. Model of “Simultaneous” Adoption to Parent–child Provisions of the Uniform Probate Code
Jason Beekman, Cornell Law Review
“The United States is currently enmeshed in a national debate over same-sex marriage. The debate is occurring in courtrooms as frequently as it occurs at the polls and in state and national legislatures. However, the legal system must address ‘trickle down’ issues stemming from, but extending beyond, the task of simply determining the particular legal status that laws grant to a homosexual relationship. One of the major trickle down issues, though often left out of the public discourse, concerns parental determination for children of same-sex couples. Left even further outside pundit discussions, however, is how this parental determination for children of same-sex couples affects the children’s inheritance rights under the laws of intestate succession. The latter concern is the principal subject of this Editorial and the full-length Note on which it is based.”
- Posted: 11/19/2010
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: legalworkshop.org
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Topic: Adoption, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Legal Periodicals
|

Latest Posts
-
www.patheos.com
05/23/2012
David French at Patheos: It’s that time again — the time when the younger evangelical generation surveys our damaged nation, observes the terrible reputation of leading evangelical “culture warriors” in the pop culture and with their peers, and says, “You guys blew it. It’s time for a new approach, for a post-partisan approach. We’re not in anyone’s political pocket. We’re not focused on politics at all.” You look at books’ like Jonathan Merritt’s A Faith of Our Own: Following Jesus Beyond the Culture Warsand think, “Finally someone is speaking to us. We’re about Jesus — not about Republicans, not Democrats, just Jesus.” Young, post-partisan evangelicals, this letter is for you.
-
www.christiannewswire.com
05/23/2012
Christian Newswire: At issue in Academy of Our Lady of Peace v. City of San Diego is the City’s refusal to approve the all-girls Catholic high school’s plan to modernize its campus and facilities, a step necessary to enable the continuation of a tradition inaugurated in 1882, of superior education for the region’s future female leaders.
-
www.lifesitenews.com
05/23/2012
LifeSiteNews: The Vatican is backing a petition campaign in the European Union that seeks a debate about enshrining personhood for the unborn from the moment of conception.

|