Military Chiefs: Homosexual agenda should not take priority over combat effectiveness

LA Times spews hate speech at FRC

Brad O’Leary: SPLC aims hate crimes law at First Amendment freedoms

Will DC Circuit allow funding of embryonic stem cell research to go on contrary to law?

UK: Report says it’s wrong to exclude God from the classroom

Obama’s stimulus pours millions into faith-based groups

Pray Tell: Americans Stretch the Truth About Church Attendance

Hillary Clinton: Secretary of State is “My Last Public Position”

    CBS: “Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has once more reiterated that she will not run for president in 2012, going so far as to refer to her current role in government as ‘my last public position.’”


  • Posted: 12/03/2010
  • |
  • Category: Miscellaneous
  • |
  • Source: www.cbsnews.com

Why pay for more population control?

Driehaus sues anti-abortion group

Argument recap: Pinning down the scope of Exemption 2 of the Freedom of Information Act

    SCOTUS Blog: “On Wednesday, the Court heard oral argument in Milner v. Department of the Navy, a case concerning the scope of Exemption 2 of the Freedom of Information Act. During argument, the Court seemed troubled by the prospect of upsetting an understanding on which lower courts and the government had relied for thirty years, but it seemed perhaps more troubled by the broad reading of Exemption 2 proposed by the government.”


  • Posted: 12/03/2010
  • |
  • Category: Miscellaneous

  • Tags:

Georgia: High School Graduation Venue Sparks Debate

Illinois Civil Unions: A Giant Step Toward Redefining Marriage

Groups to Press Obama to Defend Iraqi Christians

Pentagon report on homosexual policy buries the lead–“the majority of views expressed were against repeal.”

SC: “Panel sends adult business ordinance to Hartsville City Council”

Temecula: Mosque opponents plan to appeal

Don’t Ask and Don’t Tell Politically Inconvenient Questions

Australia: Money woes kill marriage

Canada: Many women fleeing polygamist unions suffered sex abuse, guilt: Psychologist

Over 16,000 push back against Apple’s anti-Christian tactics

Pink News: UK “Government says it will work to make companies ‘more gay-friendly’”

NPR: Smithsonian Under Fire For “Gay” Portraiture Exhibit

    NPR: But included in that meditation is a crucifix — a cross bearing the body of Christ — crawling with ants . . . Donohue says he complained to members of Congress and the Smithsonian’s Board of Regents. “My principle is very simple,” he says, “If it’s wrong for the government to take the taxpayers’ money to promote religion, why is it OK to take taxpayers’ money to assault religion?”


  • Posted: 12/03/2010
  • |
  • Category: Religious Freedom

  • Tags: , ,

Liberty Counsel: Wachovia Bank Bans Christmas Tree Displays From Its Branches

China’s U.N. influence rising, West should be careful: institute

Washington Times: Wave goodbye to Internet freedom

Pentagon survey: Spinning a yarn

A solution to the Tea Party/Pro-Life dispute over social issues

You Can’t Force People to Say the Pledge of Allegiance, Part II

Abortion, Conscience Clauses, And the Practice of Medicine

Abortion Practitioner Loses Medical License Permanently

Wilberforce Academy II (UK)

The Secular State’s Homeschooling Crackdown

Will 9th Circuit rule to protect marriage?

“What’s So Unholy and Un-American about the Manhattan Declaration”

“Maggie Gallagher’s NOM Goes After Prop 8 Judges”

Campus watch: Coed dorm rooms, professors in the dorms and a tribal artifact dispute

Reinhardt Unmoved by Prop. 8 Recusal Request

Lansing City Pulse to hand over e-mail in Mount Hope church case

Judge rejects Family Council bid in Minn. lawsuit

Attorney: E.U. bullying some members

The Ambitions of Natural Law Ethics: A Reply to Arkes

    Matthew O’Brien writes at Public Discourse: “In my review of Hadley Arkes’ book Constitutional Illusions I criticized Arkes’ account of natural law ethics. My main complaint was that Arkes’ aspirations for what natural law ethics could accomplish were unrealistic, and that in particular his argument for grounding morality in “laws of reason” such as the principle of non-contradiction was unsuccessful. Now Professor Arkes has issued a friendly challenge to me in reply: If he is wrong, then what’s the alternative? And in a healthy Socratic spirit, Arkes wants examples. How would I demonstrate the wrongfulness of racial discrimination, for instance, if not by showing that racists necessarily contradict themselves?”


  • Posted: 12/03/2010
  • |
  • Category: Miscellaneous
  • |
  • Source: www.thepublicdiscourse.com

  • Tags: ,

“The judge shortage”

Reports re: Reinhardt’s refusal to recuse

Kyrgyzstan: Osh officials to monitor local Islamic clerics

Summary Judgment Denied In Refusal To Hire Christian As Observatory Director

Pakistani cleric calls for Christian to be killed

Why Do We Have a Central Bank?