ADF attorney Jeff Shafer writes at the Speak Up Movement University Blog: The monopoly authority to centrally influence how young people understand the world is quite a prize. As we have explored in past posts (see, e.g., here and here), the idea of the religious neutrality of secularism is a myth. Secularism is a rival religion. But the myth of its non-religious character secures its governing role in our system, due to the constitutional interpretation which hands civic control exclusively to the “non-religious.” (It’s all in the categorizing, you see.) From that position of authority it is uniquely empowered to fulfill its own Great Commission to go and make disciples. Its control over the State Church of Education gives it a tremendous competitive advantage.
- Posted: 03/22/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: blog.speakupmovement.org
- Tags: Category: Religious Freedom, Topic: Colleges, Topic: Culture, Topic: Education
Huffington Post: “San Francisco Superior Court Judge Ernest Goldsmith ruled Friday that state air quality regulators failed to properly consider alternatives to their so-called cap-and-trade program, a key piece of California’s landmark global warming law, AB 32. Goldsmith ruled that the failure to consider alternatives violated state environmental law, so the California Air Resources Board must conduct further review before implementing the plan.”
- Posted: 03/22/2011
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: www.huffingtonpost.com
- Tags: State: California, Topic: Environmentalism
NPR: The Title X Family Planning program, established in 1970 with bipartisan support in Congress and signed into law by President Nixon, has been largely noncontroversial. It makes no funds available for abortion, and focuses on what Nixon characterized as the premise that “no American woman should be denied access to family planning assistance because of her economic condition.” But funding for Title X, which serves more than 5 million men and women annually, is on House Republicans’ chopping block.
- Posted: 03/22/2011
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- |
- Source: www.npr.org
- Tags: Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: Planned Parenthood, Topic: Abortion
ADF attorney Travis Barham at the Speak Up Movement University Blog: Standing. For most people, it is something they mastered when they were about one or two years old. For lawyers, it is a migraine-inducing set of legal doctrines that dictates whether someone has the right to bring a lawsuit in federal court . . . As David French explains at Phi Beta Cons, this standing question is critical for students because it determines whether courts will even review their schools’ speech codes. Until recently, the unquestioned rule was that students could challenge policies that “chilled” their speech. | Related ADF Media Information
- Posted: 03/22/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: blog.speakupmovement.org
- Tags: ADF: David French, ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Travis Barham, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, Topic: Colleges, Topic: Education, ZZ: Lopez v Candaele, ZZ: Rock for Life v. Hrabowski
Phyllis Schlafly writes at Townhall: As the new Republican House majority wrestles with ways to cut our unsustainable budget deficit, Barack Obama threw down the gauntlet. On March 14, he said, “We cannot cut education.” But why not? If we are going to cut programs that are proven to have failed to achieve their goals, federal spending on education should be at the top of the list.
- Posted: 03/22/2011
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: townhall.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Topic: Education
Michael Foust writes at Baptist Press: Matt Bowman, an attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund, told Baptist Press that pro-choicers want to “shut down the real help and hope that pregnancy centers offer women.” ADF, a pro-life legal group, filed a suit against New York March 18. “There’s not any question that crisis pregnancy centers are being targeted,” Bowman told Baptist Press. “You can read the pamphlets from the abortion movement targeting them. It’s not hidden. I think these attacks on pregnancy centers are an attempt to distract from the growing national scandals in the abortion industry and to give women fewer choices when they experience an unexpected pregnancy.”
- Posted: 03/22/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.sbcbaptistpress.org
- Tags: ADF: Matthew S. Bowman, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Sanctity of Life, State: New York, Topic: Abortion, ZZ: Pregnancy Care Center of New York v. City of New York
LifeSiteNews: The lawsuit filed by the Alliance Defense Fund is in response to Bill 371-A, which was signed into law by Mayor Michael Bloomberg last Wednesday . . . “At a time when New Yorkers believe the city’s abortion ratio to be too high, it’s absurd to see the city work with pro-abortion groups to ensure that the public is ‘protected’ from the ‘threat’ of these compassionate, caring, nonprofit groups that exist specifically because they oppose harm to women and their babies,” said Matt Bowman, legal counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF).
- Posted: 03/22/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.lifesitenews.com
- Tags: ADF: Matthew S. Bowman, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Sanctity of Life, State: New York, ZZ: Pregnancy Care Center of New York v. City of New York
National Right to Life News: The suit was brought by Centro Tepeyac Women’s Center in Silver Spring, Maryland. It is one of four of what are called “limited-service pregnancy centers” affected by the law. The Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) sued on behalf of the Center on First Amendment freedom of speech grounds. “We will show that the county has no facts to justify the idea that any signs are needed except the ideological complaints of abortion activists,” Matt Bowman, an ADF attorney, told the Gazette newspaper. “There are no facts, no examples of a pregnancy center doing anything but offering real help to women.”
- Posted: 03/22/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.nationalrighttolifenews.org
- Tags: ADF: Matthew S. Bowman, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: ACLJ, State: Maryland, State: New York, ZZ: Centro Tepeyac v. Montgomery County
Journal-Sentinel: “In a further sign of acrimony on the state’s highest court, Supreme Court Justice David Prosser said Monday that discord among the seven justices would dissipate with his election next month because some of his fellow jurists don’t want him re-elected . . . In recent weeks the Supreme Court election has been portrayed as a referendum on Gov. Scott Walker’s decision to end most collective bargaining for most of the state’s public workers. In effect, a Prosser election defeat would be viewed as a victory for unions.”
- Posted: 03/22/2011
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: www.jsonline.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, State: Wisconsin
Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel: “In a case that appears bound for the state Supreme Court, Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen on Monday asked the state appeals court to lift a Dane County judge’s hold on a law sharply curtailing public union bargaining. The Court of Appeals panel in Madison quickly responded Monday by asking for information from the prosecutor on the other side of the case by the end of Tuesday . . . ”
- Posted: 03/22/2011
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: www.jsonline.com
- Tags: State: Wisconsin, Topic: Unions
SCOTUS Blog: “2 U.S.C. § 1988 authorizes courts to award reasonable attorneys’ fees to prevailing parties in civil rights litigation. In Hensley v. Eckerhart (1983), the Court held that prevailing defendants can generally recover their fees only when “the suit was vexatious, frivolous, or brought to harass or embarrass the defendant.” Today, in Fox v. Vice (No. 10-114), the Court will hear oral argument regarding whether a defendant can recover fees for a federal civil rights claim that is determined to be frivolous . . . ”
- Posted: 03/22/2011
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: www.scotusblog.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar
|
|