Kansas Gov. Brownback moves to strip Planned Parenthood funds

In a first, women surpass men in advanced degrees

Trump: Obama Should Release College Transcripts

Ken Clarke: European judges must respect national differences

Oklahoma Senate Passes Bill to Limit Dangerous Abortion Drug

LaBruzzo sponsoring bill that would ban abortion in Louisiana

Christian Arrested for Reading the Bible in Public — Caught on Video

UK: “Catholic adoption agency loses gay adoption fight”

West Virginia Group: Tomblin, GOP Governor Candidates Pro-Life

White House berates Franklin Graham over birth comments

House May Vote on Taxpayer-Funding of Abortion Ban Next Week

“Holder defends attorney defending gay marriage ban”

Missouri: $400 Million Taxpayer Funds For University Pushing Anti-American, Anti-Capitalist Course

Erwin Chemerinsky on Prop 8 case: “The motion is offensive” and has no chance of success

“Opponents of gay marriage getting slimy and desperate”

    Adam Serwer at the Washington Post: After all, supporters of the same-sex marriage ban are arguing that marriage equality is so damaging to the institution of marriage that the government has a vital interest in making sure gays and lesbians can’t get married. That means that a straight, married judge couldn’t be expected to be impartial, either — after all, according to supporters of Prop 8, “the further deinstitutionalization of marriage caused by the legalization of same-sex marriage,” would directly impact married heterosexuals. Therefore, a heterosexual, married judge could be seen as having just as much “skin in the game” as Judge Walker.


  • Posted: 04/26/2011
  • |
  • Category: Bench & Bar
  • |
  • Source: www.washingtonpost.com

  • Tags: , , ,

Chuck Colson: Here’s comes polygamy … and why not?

Lawmaker: Impeachment of Iowa judges in not dead

Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels’s truce put to the test

Firefighters union halting federal contributions

Mass. lawmakers say sex ed web site ‘disgusting’

Attorney from Christian law firm decries Jones’ treatment in court

“W.Va. gay advocacy group hires first staffer”

Pastor Is Accused of Helping to Kidnap Girl at Center of Lesbian Custody Fight

Colleges fund LGBT centers: Texas bill would require equal time for “traditional values”

“First openly gay candidate wins in Tokyo ward”

NV Senate OKs two of three “transgender” bills

Russian Duma Drafts Bill to Cut Abortions Citing Underpopulation

North Carolina to Hold Hearing on Key Pro-Life Abortion Bill

Washington State May Increase Planned Parenthood Funding

Coca Cola played key role in King & Spalding’s decision to ditch defense of marriage?

WikiLeaks releases Gitmo files: Al-Qaida has hidden nuclear weapon

Chief Justice Roberts and the First Amendment

Knave and Spalding: A law firm drops a politically incorrect case

Poll: Most Egyptians want Quran as source of laws

Austin R. Nimocks: The Intolerance of the “Tolerant”

First Amendment Does Not Provide Right to Porn in NYC Libraries

Ken Klukowski: Profile in Courage Defending Marriage: Paul Clement

    Ken Klukowski at Townhall: Everyone should have access to a lawyer. The U.S. Constitution empowers the courts to decide whether a law is unconstitutional, but also requires that a court only do so if arguments are presented on both sides. Our constitutional system of government calls for both parties putting their best arguments on the table, so that a judge has everything necessary to arrive at the correct decision. But leftist zealots evidently don’t care about a court reaching the right decision, calling for punishing anyone who has enough faith in the American legal system to wage an honorable contest in court.


  • Posted: 04/26/2011
  • |
  • Category: Bench & Bar
  • |
  • Source: townhall.com

  • Tags: , , , ,

RLUIPA ruling could generate ‘legal nightmare’

Civil unions — ‘it’s all about affirmation’

AP: “Judge’s relationship at issue in ‘gay marriage’ case”

Rasmussen: Just 23% Realize Deficit Largely Due to Commitments Made in 1960s and ’70s

    Rasmussen Reports: In fact, a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just 23% of Likely U.S. Voters are aware that most of the current deficit is the result of spending commitments made by Congress in the 1960s and 1970s. Forty-nine percent (49%) incorrectly believe that’s not the case. Twenty-nine percent (29%) more are not sure.


  • Posted: 04/26/2011
  • |
  • Category: Miscellaneous
  • |
  • Source: www.rasmussenreports.com

  • Tags: ,

Conservative (soon-to-be) law-school grad, internationally noted columnist, looking for employment

    Eric Giunta at Renew America: he economy being what it is, I beg (and trust in) my readers’ indulgence as I engage in what follows: a shameless exercise in self-promotion . . . In the Fall of 2010, I interned full-time at the Washington, DC offices of the Alliance Defense Fund . . . I spent the Summer of 2009 studying international and comparative law at the University of Oxford’s St Edmund Hall, and (simultaneous with my externship at ADF) studying executive agency rulemaking and legislative advocacy, in Washington, DC, under the aegis of Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law. Among my work at ADF, I performed research for the case Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn, and drafted a motion for preliminary injunction on behalf of a Young Americans for Freedom chapter, whose free speech rights were being violated by school officials at Palm Beach State College . . .


  • Posted: 04/26/2011
  • |
  • Category: ADF in the News
  • |
  • Source: www.renewamerica.com

  • Tags: , , , ,

National Day of Prayer is Coming

Sex and the College Dean: On campus, lawyers rule, civility doesn’t

Wis. union battle casts shadow over local races

NLRB will sue Ariz., SD over union laws

China’s Easter offensive against the churches

China warns against “interference” ahead of U.S. rights talks

Heritage Foundation: Is the Age of America Coming to An End?

Calif. marriage amendment defenders file motion to throw out district court ruling