NCRegister.com: Piero Tozzi, senior legal counsel with the Alliance Defense Fund, noted that this manipulation could be carried out from the judge’s bench, especially since the new text of the constitution calls for a “broad application” of human rights. “As it does not specify which ‘human rights’ are to be incorporated and elevated on par with the constitution, while instructing that these undefined rights are to be given broad application, it potentially gives a judge latitude in expanding or even fabricating rights beyond what was contemplated when treaties were drafted and ratified,” he said.
- Posted: 06/10/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.ncregister.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Piero A. Tozzi, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Global, Country: Mexico, Global: Religious Freedom, Topic: Homosexual Agenda
My Way News: Falling real estate prices are eating away at home equity. The percentage of their homes that Americans own is near its lowest point since World War II, the Federal Reserve said Thursday. The average homeowner now has 38 percent equity, down from 61 percent a decade ago.
- Posted: 06/10/2011
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: apnews.myway.com
- Tags: Topic: Debt, Topic: Economy
WorldNetDaily: “Rather than allow the verses on a few pavers along walkways at Palm Desert High School, the Desert Sands Unified School District censored everyone participating in the program and refunded their money,” ADF announced . . . “Christians should be allowed to express themselves on public school campuses just like everyone else,” said ADF Senior Counsel David Cortman. “It is cowardly to shut down everyone’s participation in this program simply out of animosity toward Christian speech. There is absolutely nothing unconstitutional about a Bible verse on a brick when a school opens up a program for anyone to express a personal message. The school could simply have allowed the Bible verses, but instead, it chose to punish everyone.” . . .
- Posted: 06/10/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.wnd.com
- Tags: ADF: David Cortman, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Liberty, State: California, Topic: Education, ZZ: Hart v. Tomack
AmLaw Daily: The Alliance Defense Fund, which represented proponents of Proposition 8 in California in Perry v. Brown (originally known as Perry v. Schwarzenegger), issued a statement expressing its own disappointment with the ruling. “From its inception, marriage in Wyoming for all purposes has been the union of one man and one woman,” litigation staff counsel Daniel Blomberg said in a statement. “It is disappointing that the Wyoming Supreme Court ignored Wyoming’s clear definition of marriage in favor of the definition of a foreign country.”
- Posted: 06/10/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: amlawdaily.typepad.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Marriage and Family, State: Wyoming, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Christiansen v. Christiansen
Charisma: “Pregnancy centers, which offer real help and hope to women, shouldn’t be punished by political allies of the abortion industry,” ADF Legal Counsel Matt Bowman says. “As the district court ruled, the government cannot create special speech rules for people who want to talk about pregnancy choices. And it also cannot target pro-life centers for special sign requirements and fines while leaving speech by abortion clinics unregulated.”
- Posted: 06/10/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.charismamag.com
- Tags: ADF: Matthew S. Bowman, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), Group: Care Net, Topic: Abortion
Senior Attorney Job Description:
Conservative, non-profit, legal watchdog group located in Washington, D.C. seeks creative, independent attorney with 5-7 years of litigation experience; must have ability to handle a case from start to finish; FOIA/Open Records, civil rights, constitutional, campaign finance or whistleblower experience a plus.
Judicial Watch provides fully employer-funded health benefits, including medical, dental, vision and prescription. In addition, each employee receives a life insurance and LTD policy, and is eligible to participate in our 403(b) retirement program.
Submit resume and cover letter along with salary requirements to careers@judicialwatch.org with job title in subject line.
- Posted: 06/10/2011
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Group: Judicial Watch
MarketWatch: Well, it turns out that working longer is indeed an option, according to the Employee Benefit Research Institute latest study. The only problem is that the latest research shows that you’ll have to work much longer than you anticipated. In fact, many Americans will have to keep on working well into their 70s and 80s to afford retirement, according to the study, titled “The Impact of Deferring Retirement Age on Retirement Income Adequacy.”
- Posted: 06/10/2011
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: www.marketwatch.com
- Tags: Topic: Economy
|

Latest Posts
-
05/23/2013
Sadly, the Boy Scouts Executive National Council’s decision disregards not only the nearly 19,000 Americans who signed a petition urging BSA to ‘uphold the values that have defined the organization for over 100 years,’ but also the millions of Americans who have supported the program. Those promoting the agenda to change what the Boy Scouts have always been won’t rest until there is complete acceptance of any sexual preference for both leaders and members.
-
www.washingtonpost.com
05/23/2013
Washington Post: Jewish leaders in the media are in large part responsible for American acceptance of gay marriage, Vice President Biden said Tuesday night.
-
www.nationalreview.com
05/23/2013
Ed Whelan at National Review: There are two good reasons why the DOJ attorney’s argument that vindicating the RFRA rights of the business owners would violate the Establishment Clause was an “unexpected twist.” First, DOJ never made that argument in either of its Seventh Circuit briefs in the two cases. Second, there is good reason that it didn’t, for the argument is inane.

|