Daily Mail Online: Jaiya Ma had been living her boyfriend Jon Hanauer, 49, for six years when he urged her to take a new lover. Within weeks, Jaiya, 34, fell for a furniture designer Ian Ferguson, 44, at a dance class, and a year later she fell pregnant with his baby. But Jon supported Jaiya, welcomed Ian into his home, and the two men helped deliver baby Eamon during an ‘orgasmic’ labour.
- Posted: 12/06/2011
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: www.dailymail.co.uk
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, State: California, Topic: Marriage, Topic: Polyamory
LifeNews: Tomorrow the House Judiciary Committee Constitution Subcommittee, chaired by Rep. Trent Franks, an Arizona Republican who is the sponsor of the abortion ban, will hold a hearing on the Prenatal Nondiscrimination Act (PRENDA). Witnesses on the panel include Steve Aden, a pro-life attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund . . .
- Posted: 12/06/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.lifenews.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Steven H. Aden, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Congress, Topic: Legislation
NCPA Policy Digest: Both the federal and state governments hamper doctors’ ability to innovate in medicine and to offer more affordable or alternative care. While the federal government delays innovative medicine, state governments make affordable care more difficult by limiting the number of doctors and saddling those who do practice with difficult liability rules.
- Posted: 12/06/2011
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: www.ncpa.org
- Tags: Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare
Digital Journal: Jordan Lorence of the Alliance Defense Fund, a Christian legal organization defending the Bronx Household of Faith church, has described the Supreme Court’s dismissal of the appeal as “befuddling.” He said: “The Supreme Court’s decision not to review this case is befuddling because it has already ruled multiple times in other equal-access cases that the First Amendment protects religious worship the same as secular speech.” The Wall Street Journal reports that he said, “Churches and other religious groups should be able to meet in public buildings on the same terms as other community groups. They should not be excluded simply because of the religious nature of their speech.”
- Posted: 12/06/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.digitaljournal.com
- Tags: ADF: Jordan Lorence, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, Court: U.S. Supreme, State: New York, ZZ: Bronx Household of Faith v Board of Education of the City of New York, ZZADF: 4013
Todd Starnes (Fox News Commentary) at Baptist Press: It’s a sad day for religious liberty,” said Jordan Lorence, the church’s attorney and senior counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund. “Churches and other religious groups should be allowed to meet in public buildings on the same terms as other community groups, and they’re being denied that in New York City. “The Supreme Court’s decision not to review this case is befuddling because it has already ruled multiple times in other equal access cases that the First Amendment protects religious worship the same as secular speech.”
- Posted: 12/06/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.bpnews.net
- Tags: ADF: Jordan Lorence, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, Court: U.S. Supreme, State: New York, ZZ: Bronx Household of Faith v Board of Education of the City of New York, ZZADF: 4013
World Magazine: Lorence said the Alliance Defense Fund reviewed school districts’ rules across the country and didn’t find any similar to New York’s, but he is concerned that the court’s decision could embolden some districts to create such rules. “If that’s the case, the Alliance Defense Fund would be there to litigate those cases,” he said. “I think other appeals courts would not agree with the 2nd Circuit’s decision.”
- Posted: 12/06/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: online.worldmag.com
- Tags: ADF: Jordan Lorence, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, Court: U.S. Supreme, State: New York, ZZ: Bronx Household of Faith v Board of Education of the City of New York, ZZADF: 4013
SCOTUS Blog: This is one of a continuing series of articles the blog will publish over the next several weeks, explaining more fully the new federal health care law, and the Supreme Court’s review of the constitutionality of key parts of the law. This article is the third of three on the heart of the new law: the mandate that virtually all Americans obtain health insurance by the year 2014. Part I (found here) described why Congress adopted the mandate. Part II (found herediscussed the tie between the mandate and expanded health insurance coverage. This Part III discusses the financial penalty that Congress adopted to enforce the mandate, and how the penalty is to work. Each of these parts has included discussions of related constitutional questions. Prior posts in this overall series can be read, in sequence, here and here and here.
- Posted: 12/06/2011
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: www.scotusblog.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Florida v. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services
Sally Satel at WSJ.com (full access via Google): In October of 2009, Kumud Majumder, the father of an 11-year-old son with advanced leukemia, joined a lawsuit challenging the federal ban on compensating bone-marrow donors. He wanted to save his son’s life. Last week Mr. Majumder and his co-plaintiffs enjoyed a victory. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that the majority of bone-marrow donors may lawfully be compensated.
- Posted: 12/06/2011
- |
- Category: Sanctity of Life
- Tags: Category: Sanctity of Life, State: Oregon, ZZ: Flynn v. Holder
CSMonitor.com: “A victory for tax increases in California could encourage similar moves in other states,” says Jack Pitney, a political scientist at Claremont McKenna College. “If the tax measure goes down to defeat – in a blue state running a huge deficit – the effect would be to chill such proposals in other states for many years to come.”
- Posted: 12/06/2011
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: www.csmonitor.com
- Tags: State: California, Topic: Taxation
|
Latest Posts
-
05/24/2012
The ADF Alliance Alert will not be published on Friday, May 25th and Monday, May 28th.
-
www.huffingtonpost.com
05/24/2012
Huffington Post: A measure allowing same-sex civil unions passed its first legislative step in Brazil’s Congress, where it has lingered for 16 years.
-
www.christianpost.com
05/24/2012
Christian Post: “There has to be a wall institutionally between the government and the church or religious groups,” he said. “But many have taken that law of separation to think that it means separating religion from politics, which is precisely the opposite of what the Founding Fathers wanted.”
|