Christianity Today: Until the IRS sorts out who can authorize church audits, churches are left in limbo, said Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) senior legal counsel Erik Stanley. “It has become an intolerable system of self-censorship,” he said. “Society labels biblical issues as political, and pastors just back away.”
- Posted: 12/12/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.christianitytoday.com
- Tags: ADF: Erik Stanley, ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Pulpit Initiative, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Liberty, Group: Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Topic: Church Sovereignty
Engage Family Minute: Jordan Lorence, senior vice-president with the Alliance Defense Fund, has been the chief litigator on this case. Jordan wrote an instructive blog post on the topic (copied below), but also took the time to join me for a brief discussion over the phone. I hope you will listen to it – especially if you are a pastor or elder committed to planting churches in West Virginia – and share it with your friends. [audio at the link]
- Posted: 12/12/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: engagefamilyminute.com
- Tags: ADF: Jordan Lorence, ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Multimedia, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Liberty, Group: Family Policy Council of West Virginia, State: New York, Topic: Education, ZZ: Bronx Household of Faith v Board of Education of the City of New York
The Hill: Schmidt said the controversial Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) would punish Web firms, including search engines, that link to foreign websites dedicated to online piracy. He said implementing the bill as written would effectively break the Internet.
- Posted: 12/12/2011
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: thehill.com
- Tags: Topic: Congress, Topic: Internet
Jeff Jacob at Townhall: In the weird logic and language of the American postal system, the key to success was to give the public less for its money. The more things change in Postal World, the more they remain the same. In the 1960s, a stunning 83 percent of the agency’s total budget went to wages and benefits . . . “Labor represents 80 percent of the agency’s expenses, compared with 53 percent at United Parcel Service and 32 percent at FedEx, its two biggest private competitors.”
- Posted: 12/12/2011
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: townhall.com
- Tags: Topic: Unions
Reuters: Every year, thousands of third-year law students across the country apply for coveted federal judicial clerkships, and every year, the same law schools — Yale, Stanford, and Harvard — top the list of those whose graduates populate federal judges’ chambers. But for the class of 2012, which began receiving its clerkship offers this fall, a new name has muscled in among the elite old guard: The University of California at Irvine School of Law . . .
- Posted: 12/12/2011
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, State: California, Topic: Colleges, Topic: Education
The Texas Tribune: Forget everything. The candidate announcements, the relocations, the decisions not to run again, the who vs. who vs. who and the campaign finance. Poof! With a one-paragraph order on Friday night, the U.S. Supreme Court froze the Texas congressional and legislative elections and replaced pre-holiday candidate filings, politicking and fundraising with uncertainty and chaos.
- Posted: 12/12/2011
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: www.texastribune.org
- Tags: Court: U.S. Supreme, State: Texas, Topic: Politics
National Right to Life News: “’The hospital filed a brief last week [December 3] asking the court’s permission to continue bullying nurses into participating in elective abortion cases,” [Alliance Defense Fund] lawyer Matt Bowman said in an e-mail. “Only by guaranteeing the court and the nurses that it has reversed its position would it prove that UMDNJ might finally be interested in following the law. Until then, ADF will continue to fight the illegal discrimination against these pro-life nurses.”
- Posted: 12/12/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.nationalrighttolifenews.org
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, State: New Jersey, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, ZZ: Danquah v. University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, ZZADF: 35875
The New American: Nonetheless, Steven Aden of the pro-life Alliance Defense Fund predicted that should the bill become law, it would be able to survive a legal challenge all the way to the Supreme Court. “This bill strikes at commercial activity, not personal private choices,” Aden explained. “Under the bill, no woman can be sued or prosecuted for having an abortion based on the gender or race of her baby, but the abortionist can, and that’s the key.”
- Posted: 12/12/2011
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.thenewamerican.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Steven H. Aden, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion
NCPA Policy Digest: Responding to budgetary issues and this public criticism, cash-strapped governments in many states are considering ways to reduce the costs associated with public unions. In doing so, the stark contrasts between the public sector and private sector in unionization become clear as many question what the true costs of unions are, says Lee E. Ohanian, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution.
- Posted: 12/12/2011
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: www.ncpa.org
- Tags: Topic: Debt, Topic: Unions
It addresses a question that was hotly debated when Madeline was born 22 years ago, remains hot now – and still has no answer: “What is the real age of viability? No one knows,” said Dr. Stephen Welty, neonatology chief at Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children’s Hospital in Houston.
- Posted: 12/12/2011
- |
- Category: Featured
- |
- Source: hosted.ap.org
- Tags: Category: Sanctity of Life
NeJaime, Douglas, Marriage Inequality: Religious Exemptions and the Production of Sexual Orientation Discrimination (December 7, 2011). California Law Review, Forthcoming; Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2011-46. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1969560
As more states consider marriage recognition for same-sex couples, attention turns to the conflict between marriage equality and religious liberty. Legal scholars are contributing substantially to the debate, generating a robust academic literature and writing directly to state lawmakers urging them to include a “marriage conscience protection,” containing a series of religious exemptions, in marriage legislation. Yet the intense scrutiny of religious freedom specifically in the context of same-sex marriage obscures the root of the conflict. At stake is the relational enactment of sexual orientation; same-sex relationships constitute lesbian and gay identity, and religious objections arise largely in response to such relationships. Same-sex marriage is merely one form of sexual orientation identity enactment, and religious objections to same-sex marriage are merely a subset of objections to sexual orientation equality. By exposing the connections between same-sex relationships and lesbian and gay identity, this Article argues for an antidiscrimination regime that includes same-sex relationships more comprehensively; in doing so, it resists the use of marriage as antidiscrimination, both for same-sex couples and religious objectors. Yet even as the “marriage conscience protection” proposed by religious liberty scholars misapprehends the basis of the underlying conflict, its sweeping language threatens to reach into the antidiscrimination domain and target lesbians and gay men based not primarily on their marriages but instead more generally on their same-sex relationships. By permitting religious organizations, as well as some employers, property owners, and small businesses, to discriminate against same-sex couples throughout the course of the couples’ married lives in situations far removed from marriage itself, the “marriage conscience protection” may have unintended consequences that would threaten substantial progress made in antidiscrimination law. Worse yet, using the term “marriage conscience protection” to label instances of discrimination against same-sex relationships would hide an increasing amount of sexual orientation discrimination that antidiscrimination law is just beginning to address.
- Posted: 12/12/2011
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: ssrn.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Liberty, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Legal Periodicals, Topic: Marriage
|

Latest Posts
-
www.christiannewswire.com
06/18/2013
Christian Newswire: Congressman Mark Meadows (R-NC) today introduced a resolution in the U.S. House to amend the United States Constitution to protect children and parents from governmental overreach. The proposed Parental Rights Amendment already has 40 original cosponsors. ParentalRights.org leads grassroots support for the measure.
-
www.lifenews.com
06/18/2013
LifeNews: The vote for the bill broke down on mostly partisan lines with Republicans supporting the ban on late-term abortions and Democrats opposing it. The House approved the bill on a 229-195 vote with 7 Democrats voting for the bill and 6 Republicans voting against it. The bill, if it receives a vote in the Democrat-controlled Senate, is not expected to pass and pro-abortion President Barack Obama has issued a veto threat.
-
www.lifesitenews.com
06/18/2013
LifeSiteNews: The Chinese government has given notice to citizens of the city Huizhou that all women of childbearing age must be fitted with Intrauterine Devices (IUDs) or be permanently sterilized via tubal ligations.

|