LaTimes.com: The 5th District Court of Appeal ruled that the U.S. and Florida constitutions trump Florida law and give parenting rights to both women. State law, it added, has not kept up with the times. | D.M.H. v. D.M.T., No. 5D09-3559 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. (5th), Dec. 23, 2011)
- Posted: 01/04/2012
- |
- Category: Featured
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: Lambda Legal, State: Florida, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: IVF, Topic: Parental Rights, Topic: Surrogacy, ZZ: D.M.H. v. D.M.T.
Kevin Theriot at Speak Up Movement: The more fundamental question, however, is what does the Bronx Household of Faith case tell us about the state of religious freedom in America? At minimum, we now know that some government officials and federal judges believe religious worship gets less constitutional protection than virtually any other type of expression – including political speeches, scientific lectures, global warming conferences, homosexual “rights” rallies, and even anti-religious teaching.
- Posted: 01/04/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: blog.speakupmovement.org
- Tags: ADF: Kevin Theriot, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Liberty, Topic: Education, ZZ: Bronx Household of Faith v Board of Education of the City of New York
K2 Radio: “We’re interested in protecting First Amendment rights across the country in situations like this where a group is being singled out because of their religious expression and that expression is being banned, even where other groups are allowed to erect similar displays and similar viewpoints in the area,” said Jonathan Scruggs, a lawyer for the Alliance Defense Fund. Scruggs said WyWatch Family Action wants to put up materials communicating members’ belief that “life begins in the womb.” “I don’t think it’s the type of situation where it’s any type of gruesome photo or anything along those lines, where it’s a baby that’s been aborted, or a fetus that’s been aborted,” Scruggs. “It’s more of a depiction of a baby in the womb.”
- Posted: 01/04/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: k2radio.com
- Tags: ADF: Jonathan Scruggs, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Sanctity of Life, State: Wyoming, Topic: Abortion
Constitutional experts warn a new law that allows the president to permanently detain U.S. citizens without trial could be used against pro-life activists, who have already been defined as potential terrorists in documents by some government agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security.
- Posted: 01/04/2012
- |
- Category: Featured
- Tags: Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: Christian Coalition, Group: Feminists for Life, Group: Life Legal Defense Foundation, Group: National Right to Life, Group: Rutherford Institute, Group: USCCB, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Legislation, Topic: Military
U.S. Senator Scott Brown at The Boston Globe: GOP PRESIDENTIAL hopeful Newt Gingrich recently made disturbing comments regarding the judiciary. He proposed that Congress should be able to impeach judges whose decisions he believes to be wrong. If elected, he would abolish courts that displease him, ignore Supreme Court decisions he doesn’t approve of, and order US marshals to arrest judges to force them to explain their decisions to Congress.
- Posted: 01/04/2012
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: bostonglobe.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Topic: Nominations, Topic: Politics
|
Latest Posts
-
www.americanthinker.com
05/23/2013
Steven H. Aden at American Thinker: In the wake of the Kermit Gosnell prosecution and conviction, a number of abortion advocates have attempted to argue that state-created restrictions on abortion may actually be to blame.
-
hosted.ap.org
05/23/2013
AP: The Socialists, who finished second in Bulgaria’s election this month, were asked to form a new government Thursday, after the front-running party was unable to.
-
05/23/2013
AP: In the most prominent challenge of its kind, Hobby Lobby Stores Inc. is asking a federal appeals court Thursday for an exemption from part of the federal health care law that requires it to offer employees health coverage that includes access to the morning-after pill.
|