The New American: Jordan Lorence of the Alliance Defense Fund, the legal advocacy group assisting NYC churches that are being displaced, said the city appeared to be using the ruling against the Bronx Household of Faith as justification to ban congregations from other public buildings, particularly in the case of the NYCHA, which had informed several churches meeting in community centers that their short-term leases were no longer valid. “They can’t use the Bronx Household case as some kind of all-purpose permission slip to banish private worship services from every public venue,” Lorence said of the city’s efforts.
- Posted: 01/16/2012
- |
- Category: Uncategorized
- |
- Source: www.thenewamerican.com
- Tags: ADF: Jordan Lorence, ADF: Media Clips, Category: Religious Freedom, Topic: Education, ZZ: Bronx Household of Faith v Board of Education of the City of New York, ZZADF: 4013
Doug Farrow at Touchstone: Why fight same-sex marriage? Even in America, where the outcome is not yet decided, there appear to be good reasons not to. The optics are poor and the mandate seems uncertain. Prospects for victory appear slim. Resources that might be reserved for more important fronts—abortion, for example—are squandered in defense of an institution to which our modern urban society is no longer committed. Industrial economies, reprogenetic technologies, and new ideas of autonomy—not to speak of new moralities—have called into question many of the assumptions on which that institution has always been based.
- Posted: 01/16/2012
- |
- Category: Featured
- |
- Source: www.touchstonemag.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Culture, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage
Jonathan Turley at The Washington Post: Even as we pass judgment on countries we consider unfree, Americans remain confident that any definition of a free nation must include their own — the land of free. Yet, the laws and practices of the land should shake that confidence.
- Posted: 01/16/2012
- |
- Category: Miscellaneous
- |
- Source: www.washingtonpost.com
MyFoxPhoneix.com: Kay Vergnetti and her husband Angelo raised their four children — it was time to travel, see Europe and go on cruises, but that all came to a screeching halt. “She remembers everything that happened that night at the altercation..every single thing,” said Kay. Child Protective Services removed their granddaughter Courtney from her mother and father after a violent fight. She was only 2½ years old.
- Posted: 01/16/2012
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: www.myfoxphoenix.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Topic: Culture
Russell Wheeler at Brookings Institute: Overall, from President Jimmy Carter’s administration to that of President George W. Bush, confirmation rates for circuit nominees have declined steadily (counting someone who was renominated in the same or different Congresses as a single nominee). District nominees’ confirmation rates, though, have hovered around the 90 percent mark (President George H.W. Bush’s district judge figures are misleading +).
- Posted: 01/16/2012
- |
- Category: Bench & Bar
- |
- Source: www.brookings.edu
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Topic: Nominations
William Saunders The Federalist Society Engage Volume 12, Issue 3, November 2011: Religion can be an intensely personal activity. However, the idea that religion is only a private, personal devotion with no public political consequences is relatively new. For many nations in Europe, religion, in particular Catholicism, exerted an important influence over government and politics for centuries. The remnants of this influence still remain in anthems, oaths, and ideologies, not to mention architecture. However, with the rise of an ideology of “strict separation of church and state” in the European Union and the Council of Europe, it has been unclear how countries may incorporate their religious influences and histories into public life and expression. The case of Lautsi v. Italy in the European Court of Human Rights illustrates this struggle between secular ideology and religious faith and affiliation in the European context. The ultimate decision in the case acknowledges that “freedom of religion” need not result in, as the late Richard John Neuhaus put it, the naked public square.1
- Posted: 01/16/2012
- |
- Category: Global: Religious Freedom
- |
- Source: www.fed-soc.org
- Tags: Country: Italy, Global: Religious Freedom, Topic: Secularism, ZZ: Lautsi v. Italy
Feinberg, Jessica, Exposing the Traditional Marriage Agenda (January 9, 2012). Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1982025
The success of a social justice movement, especially with regard to issues upon which the public will be voting, depends in significant part on how the issues are defined or framed. Anti-same-sex marriage campaigns frequently urge voters to vote in favor of laws defining marriage as between a man and a woman in order to “protect traditional marriage.” Instead of framing the issue as a question of whether individuals of the same sex should be banned from marrying, anti-same-sex marriage campaigns often frame the issue as a question of whether traditional marriage should be protected from redefinition. This strategy has proven successful for anti-same-sex marriage campaigns. However, same-sex marriage opponents rarely have been challenged with regard to the meaning of “traditional marriage.” In exploring the history of marriage within the United States, it becomes clear that, contrary to the understanding of the term held by the general public, traditional marriage consists of much more than opposite-sex spouses. The requirements of traditional marriage also include permanence, gender roles, monogamy, and procreation. As it turns out, the leading anti-same-sex marriage organizations are well aware of these other requirements of traditional marriage and do a significant amount of work to protect them – work about which the public remains largely unaware. This Article argues that exposing the true meaning of traditional marriage and the leading anti-same-sex marriage organizations’ efforts to protect the other requirements of traditional marriage would be a helpful strategy for pro-same-sex marriage campaigns. Specifically, it would give same-sex marriage proponents an effective response to the argument that people should vote against same-sex marriage in order to protect traditional marriage and provide pro-same-sex marriage campaigns with a compelling new way to frame the issue.
- Posted: 01/16/2012
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: ssrn.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Legal Periodical, Topic: Marriage
ADF Attorney Steven Aden at Townhall Conservative: The basic components of a choice are easiest understood as a selection of one option out of the two or more options that are presented at any given time. Often choices are simple: vanilla or rocky road, for example. But sometimes they are difficult, especially if the choice in view carries life-altering—and perhaps even life-ending—consequences. One thing, however, is for sure—when only one avenue or one side is presented there is no real choice to be made.
- Posted: 01/16/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: townhall.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Steven H. Aden, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Sanctity of Life, State: Texas, Topic: Abortion, ZZ: Texas Medical Providers Performing Abortion Services v. Lakey
Alaska Dispatch: The ADF also notes that the current exemption “does not even adequately protect religious organizations.” “Rather than exempting all acts of a religious organization, the exemption only applies when the challenged conduct is ‘reasonably calculated to promote the religious principles for which it is established or maintained,’” the ADF observes. “This type of exemption requires courts to determine whether the challenged conduct is sufficiently connected to the organization’s religious mission.” This will require judges to “evaluate sensitive religious matters outside their legitimate scope of authority,” the ADF adds
- Posted: 01/16/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.alaskadispatch.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, State: Alasaka, Topic: Homosexual Agenda
CNN (includes video): Jordan Lorence, an attorney from the Alliance Defense Fund, which has been fighting the policy for two decades, said that all legal avenues had been exhausted and that the only way to stop the ban was for Bloomberg to use his executive authority to change the Board of Education policy and allow religious groups to rent space in public schools. “We benefit the community. Why can’t we meet like everybody else? Why do you think that empty school buildings are better than having churches that are helping poor people that are helping people get off drugs, get out of crime and tutoring students of all faiths?”
- Posted: 01/16/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: religion.blogs.cnn.com
- Tags: ADF: Jordan Lorence, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Freedom, Topic: Education, ZZ: Bronx Household of Faith v Board of Education of the City of New York, ZZADF: 4013
LifeSiteNews: “He said this isn’t a case of religious liberty, which is simply not true,” Jim Campbell, who represented the resort and serves as litigation staff counsel with the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF), told LifeSiteNews.com. “What this case involves at its core is the rights of a religious group to use its property in a way that is consistent with its religious beliefs.” Campbell said most people will find Metzger’s belief that the state can force a religious facility to violate its conscience “a very scary concept. If that is a principle of the law, then essentially the government can cast aside religion if it deems something more important.” Campbell called Metzger’s ruling “an error of Constitutional law.”
- Posted: 01/16/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.lifesitenews.com
- Tags: ADF: Jim Campbell, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Freedom, State: New Jersey, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Bernstein v. Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association, ZZADF: 2070
Prof Life Blogs: Today, on behalf of the adult stem researchers it represents, the Jubilee Campaign’sLaw of Life Project and their co-counsel at the Alliance Defense Fund and Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, filed their opening Appellants’ Brief asking the United States Court of Appeals to “reverse the district court’s judgment in favor of Defendants, reverse the grant of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and the denial of [Appellants'] Motion for Summary Judgment, and remand with directions to enter summary judgment for [Appellants].”
- Posted: 01/16/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.prolifeblogs.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: Jubilee Campaign Law of Life Project (LOLP), Topic: Embryonic Stem Cell Research, ZZ: Sherley v. Sebelius
Examiner.com: However the response was: “The government should not be able to force a private Christian organization to use its property in a way that would violate its own religious beliefs,” said Jim Campbell, a litigation staff counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund. “Religious groups have the right to use their private property in a way that is consistent with their beliefs. That right, protected by both the New Jersey and U.S. constitutions, obviously trumps any law enacted by the state’s legislature.”
- Posted: 01/16/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.examiner.com
- Tags: ADF: Jim Campbell, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Freedom, State: New Jersey, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Bernstein v. Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association, ZZADF: 20709
Manasquan.patch.com: When asked if they would appeal the decision, the association’s attorney, Jim Campbell, of the Alliance Defense Fund based in Scottsdale, Ariz., said his client was discussing “all options.” Campbell added that he still believed that the association was on the right side of the law. “The government should not be able to force a private religious organization to use its property in a way that would violate its own beliefs,” Campbell said by telephone on Friday. “That’s why Ocean Grove is asserting its constitutional rights and that’s why Ocean Grove ultimately believes that the law is on its side.”
- Posted: 01/16/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: manasquan.patch.com
- Tags: ADF: Jim Campbell, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Freedom, State: New Jersey, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Bernstein v. Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association, ZZADF: 2070
One News Now: Jim Campbell, an attorney representing the church, said the decision may be appealed. He said, “The government should not be able to force a private Christian organization to use its property in a way that would violate its own religious beliefs.”
- Posted: 01/16/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.onenewsnow.com
- Tags: ADF: Jim Campbell, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Freedom, State: New Jersey, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Bernstein v. Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association, ZZADF: 20709
|
Latest Posts
-
05/24/2012
The ADF Alliance Alert will not be published on Friday, May 25th and Monday, May 28th.
-
www.huffingtonpost.com
05/24/2012
Huffington Post: A measure allowing same-sex civil unions passed its first legislative step in Brazil’s Congress, where it has lingered for 16 years.
-
www.christianpost.com
05/24/2012
Christian Post: “There has to be a wall institutionally between the government and the church or religious groups,” he said. “But many have taken that law of separation to think that it means separating religion from politics, which is precisely the opposite of what the Founding Fathers wanted.”
|