OneNewsNow.com: “The university will allow political speakers to come on campus without having to [jump through] these hoops and go over these burdens. But for our client’s religious speech, he has to get insurance, pay money, [and] do all these difficult things,” Scruggs explains. [more . . . ]
- Posted: 01/23/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.onenewsnow.com
- Tags: ADF: Jonathan Scruggs, ADF: Media Clips, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: WyWatch, State: Wyoming, Topic: Abortion, ZZ: Arneson v. Maricopa Community College District, ZZADF: 33518
The Republic: As long as the course is objective, it’s constitutional, said David Cortman, a lawyer with Phoenix-based Alliance Defense Fund, a Christian legal group that supports the Bible classes.
“I believe it’s an extremely important type of course to provide just because our culture is so saturated with biblical reference and biblical allusions,” Cortman said.
- Posted: 01/23/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.therepublic.com
- Tags: ADF: David Cortman, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Liberty, State: Arizona, Topic: Culture, Topic: Education, Topic: Legislation
HeraldNet.com – Local news: Around the country, there are 39 other Family Policy Institutes like Washington’s. Each is independently run yet share one thing in common — an association with the Focus on the Family arm of the Alliance Defense Fund, Family Research Council and CitizenLink. Backholm made clear association is legally different than affiliation. “We are totally self-sustaining, self-funded and self-operating,” he said. “We get no funds for operation.” Yet the ties are strong. The Alliance Defense Fund planned to dispatch lawyers to Olympia last week to strategize with lawmakers opposed to legalizing same-sex marriage.
- Posted: 01/23/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: heraldnet.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Marriage and Family, Group: Family Policy Institute of Washington, Group: Family Research Council (FRC), Group: Focus on the Family, State: Washington
Anchorage Daily News: The main problem as the Alliance Defense Fund sees it is that private business owners could be forced to hire or do business with people whose sexual orientation doesn’t match their religious beliefs, said Holly Carmichael, a lawyer for the fund. “The ultimate concern with enacting something like that is that it infringes on religious freedoms,” Carmichael said. “There’s a huge constitutional concern here.” [more . . . ]
- Posted: 01/23/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.adn.com
- Tags: ADF: Holly Carmichael, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Marriage and Family, Category: Religious Liberty, Group: Alaska Family Council, State: Alaska, Topic: Homosexual Agenda
Tucson Citizen – News from The Arizona Republic: “The fliers of Christian groups shouldn’t be banned while other groups can freely invite students to their meetings and activities,” said Jeremy Tedesco, an attorney for the Alliance Defense Fund, in a statement. “That’s the position of numerous federal court rulings, and Dysart’s flier policies fit the mold of those that have been declared unconstitutional.” [more . . . ]
- Posted: 01/23/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: tucsoncitizen.com
- Tags: ADF: Jeremy Tedesco, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Liberty, Group: Center for Arizona Policy, State: Arizona, Topic: Education, ZZ: Child Evangelism Fellowship Phoenix v. Dysart Unified School District, ZZADF: 35450
The Republic: Jonathan Scruggs, a Tennessee lawyer with the Alliance Defense Fund who is representing WyWatch Family Action, also declined comment on the state’s claim that its new policy should end the legal action. The Alliance Defense Fund, an Arizona-based Christian civil rights group, has litigated against same-sex marriage in California. The group also supported the recent unsuccessful push in Wyoming to change state law to specify that the state shouldn’t recognize same-sex marriages performed elsewhere.
- Posted: 01/23/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.therepublic.com
- Tags: ADF: Jonathan Scruggs, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: WyWatch, State: Wyoming, Topic: Abortion, ZZ: WyWatch Family Action v. Cathcart, ZZADF: 33529
Phoenix New Times: Other school districts have been sued successfully for doing the same thing, notes Jeremy Tedesco of the Alliance Defense Fund, which is providing legal services for the CEF along with the Center for Arizona Policy. He’s right: The Scottsdale Unified School District used to have such a policy, but a 2003 lawsuit brought with the help of the ADF reversed it.
- Posted: 01/23/2012
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com
- Tags: ADF: Jeremy Tedesco, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defense Fund, Category: Religious Liberty, State: Arizona, Topic: Education, ZZ: Child Evangelism Fellowship Phoenix v. Dysart Unified School District, ZZADF: 35450
|

Latest Posts
-
05/23/2013
Sadly, the Boy Scouts Executive National Council’s decision disregards not only the nearly 19,000 Americans who signed a petition urging BSA to ‘uphold the values that have defined the organization for over 100 years,’ but also the millions of Americans who have supported the program. Those promoting the agenda to change what the Boy Scouts have always been won’t rest until there is complete acceptance of any sexual preference for both leaders and members.
-
www.washingtonpost.com
05/23/2013
Washington Post: Jewish leaders in the media are in large part responsible for American acceptance of gay marriage, Vice President Biden said Tuesday night.
-
www.nationalreview.com
05/23/2013
Ed Whelan at National Review: There are two good reasons why the DOJ attorney’s argument that vindicating the RFRA rights of the business owners would violate the Establishment Clause was an “unexpected twist.” First, DOJ never made that argument in either of its Seventh Circuit briefs in the two cases. Second, there is good reason that it didn’t, for the argument is inane.

|