Baptist Press: Page, though, told them that pressure should never trump principle, and he added that he could no longer laud the Scouts for standing on principle. Just six months ago, the Boy Scouts released a statement standing by the ban, saying a “majority of our membership” agrees with the policy and that the “vast majority of the parents of youth we serve value their rights to address issues of same-sex orientation within their family, with spiritual advisers, and at the appropriate time and in the right setting.”
- Posted: 01/29/2013
- |
- Category: Featured
- |
- Source: encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Group: Boy Scouts, Topic: Culture, Topic: Homosexual Agenda
USCCB: Urging the Court to uphold DOMA http://www.usccb.org/about/general-counsel/amicus-briefs/upload/united-states-v-windsor.pdf the USCCB brief in United States v. Windsor says that “there is no fundamental right to marry a person of the same sex.” The brief also states that “as defined by courts ‘sexual orientation’ is not a classification that should trigger heightened scrutiny,” such as race or ethnicity would . . . In a separate brief filed in Hollingsworth v Perry urging the Court to uphold Proposition 8 http://www.usccb.org/about/general-counsel/amicus-briefs/upload/hollingsworth-v-perry.pdf, the USCCB states that there are many reasons why the state may reasonably support and encourage marriage, understood as the union of one man and one woman, as distinguished from other relationships.
- Posted: 01/29/2013
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: usccb.org
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Docs: Amici Briefs, Group: USCCB, State: California, State: Massachusetts, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Hollingsworth v. Perry, ZZ: Windsor v. United States, ZZADF: 26561, ZZADF: 33121
Liberty Counsel: Today, Liberty Counsel is filing two amicus briefs with the United States Supreme Court on two marriage cases, the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) (U.S. v. Windsor) and California’s Proposition 8 (Hollingsworth v. Perry), a state marriage amendment. The High Court will decide both cases by the end of the term in June 2013. “We are at a pivotal point in history,” said Mat Staver, Founder and Chairman of Liberty Counsel. “Nothing will define the future of America more than the Court’s decision on marriage.”
- Posted: 01/29/2013
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: www.lc.org
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Court: U.S. Supreme, Group: Liberty Counsel, State: California, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Hollingsworth v. Perry, ZZADF: 26561
Christian Newswire: Male-female marriage received a vigorous defense Monday in a case before the U.S. Supreme Court. The Manhattan Declaration, Inc., the voice of more than 500,000 Orthodox, Catholic, and Evangelical Christians, filed a “friend of the court” (amicus) brief. The foundational document of this organization, which has gained over half-a-million signatures, addresses religious liberty, sanctity of life, and traditional marriage. (links to brief)
- Posted: 01/29/2013
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: www.christiannewswire.com
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Court: U.S. Supreme, Docs: Amici Briefs, State: California, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Manhattan Declaration, Topic: Marriage, ZZ: Hollingsworth v. Perry, ZZADF: 26561
Heritage Foundation: Countless statistics show marriage is a good thing for people and society. The Heritage Foundation has numerous studies discussing the financial, health, and overall living benefits that come along with marriage versus cohabitation or the single life. That’s why marriage is an important part of a thriving civil society that makes limited government possible. But an increasing number of men and women (especially of the current generation) are delaying marriage or simply not getting married. Why is that, when the facts point to life successes after the “I do’s”?
- Posted: 01/29/2013
- |
- Category: Marriage & Family
- |
- Source: blog.heritage.org
- Tags: Category: Marriage and Family, Topic: Culture, Topic: Marriage
Americans United for Separation of Church and State: In a friend-of-the-court brief, Americans United urged the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold the Obama administration’s contraceptive mandate, which requires most businesses to provide workers with a health insurance that includes no-cost birth control.
- Posted: 01/29/2013
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: www.au.org
- Tags: ADF: HHS Litigation, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: Americans United for Separation of Church and State, State: Colorado, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare, ZZ: Newland v. Sebelius, ZZADF: 37155
Religion Clause Blog: As reported by Courthouse News Service yesterday, a bill has been introduced in the Texas legislature that would give offsetting state tax refunds or credits to any business that pays a federal fine for refusing on conscience grounds to offer employees a health insurance plan that includes emergency contraception.
- Posted: 01/29/2013
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: religionclause.blogspot.com
- Tags: Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, State: Texas, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Legislation, Topic: Obamacare
WorldNetDaily: The Alliance Defending Freedom says the ruling by the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals “mandates hostility to religion and puts the free exercise rights of students at risk.” “Church buildings should not be treated like toxic warehouses simply because they normally house religious activities. That has never been the intent of the First Amendment,” said ADF Senior Counsel David Cortman. “On the contrary, as the judges who dissented on the 7th Circuit’s opinion said, this opinion clearly exhibits an unconstitutional hostility toward religion. The government isn’t being neutral toward religion when it treats it worse.” (quotes from ADF Brief)
- Posted: 01/29/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.wnd.com
- Tags: ADF: David Cortman, ADF: Media Clips, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Religious Liberty, Topic: Education, Topic: RLUIPA, ZZ: Elmbrook School District v. Doe, ZZADF: 39043
Michael Norton on AM 91 Point of Faith with Roy Hanschke and Denise Washington-Blomberg | Roy MP3 audio 8:02 mins
- Posted: 01/29/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Michael J. Norton, ADF: Multimedia, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Bench and Bar, Category: Religious Liberty, Category: Sanctity of Life, Group: ACLU, State: Colorado, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Conscience, Topic: Contraception, Topic: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Topic: Insurance, Topic: Obamacare
Dave Cortman appeared on several radio shows to discuss this: Supreme Court asked to toss ruling that treats church buildings like toxic dumps | The Zeb Bell Show, MP3 audio 14:01 mins | WAVA on the Don Kroah Show, MP3 audio 13:10 mins
- Posted: 01/29/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- Tags: ADF: David Cortman, ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Multimedia, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Religious Liberty, Topic: Education, Topic: RLUIPA, ZZ: Elmbrook School District v. Doe, ZZADF: 39043
Peter Berger at the American Interest: But I do want to make a general observation: In all these cases the authorities accused of violating the plaintiffs’ rights operate with a definition of religion as a private matter to be kept out of public space. There is here a general issue of government overreach, as clearly illustrated by the (still unresolved) attempt by the Obama administration to force Catholic institutions to provide contraception coverage in their employees’ health plans. Beyond that, though, there is a very ideological view of the place of religion in society. In other words, religion is to be an activity engaged in by consenting adults in private. The attorney for the Judeo-Christian side in the aforementioned American case had it quite right when he compared the treatment of his client’s religion with measures of disease control. This is not an attitude one would expect to find in a Western democracy. It is curiously reminiscent of policies toward religion in Communist countries and toward non-Muslims under Islamic rule.
- Posted: 01/29/2013
- |
- Category: Religious Liberty
- Tags: Category: Global, Category: Religious Liberty, Global: Religious Liberty, Group: European Center for Law and Justice (ECLJ), Group: Freedom from Religion Foundation, Topic: Islam, Topic: Secularism
GoErie.com: There is no doubt that religious liberty is under serious threat in Britain, particularly for Christians,” says Paul Coleman, a lawyer with the Alliance Defending Freedom, which was involved with cases before the European human-rights court. “In the language of ‘equality,’ ‘diversity’ and ‘tolerance,’ secularists have found a way to sideline and marginalize Christianity, successfully framing the moral beliefs of Christians as ‘intolerant’ or ‘discriminatory’ and unworthy of protection. Unless a true balance is found, where Christians can be accommodated in the public square and not shut out, we will see many more cases like the four before the ECHR in the headlines.”
- Posted: 01/29/2013
- |
- Category: ADF in the News
- |
- Source: www.goerie.com
- Tags: ADF: Media Clips, ADF: Paul Coleman, Alliance Defending Freedom, Category: Global, Country: European Union, Country: United Kingdom, Court: European Court of Human Rights, Global: Religious Liberty, Topic: Secularism, ZZ: Eweida and Chaplin v. United Kingdom, ZZ: Ladele and McFarlane v. United Kingdom, ZZADF: 34667
Gatestone Institute: When one thinks of Yemen—the impoverished Arab country that begat Osama bin Laden, and is cushioned between Saudi Arabia and Somalia, two of the absolute most radical Muslim nations—one seldom thinks of Christians, primarily because they are practically nonexistent in such an inhospitable environment. Most tallies, in fact, suggest that Yemen’s entire non-Muslim population is less than one percent. A new Arabic report , however, discusses the existence of Christians in Yemen, and their plight—one that should be familiar by now, given the situation wherever Christian minorities live under Muslim majorities.
- Posted: 01/29/2013
- |
- Category: Global: Religious Liberty
- |
- Source: www.gatestoneinstitute.org
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: Yemen, Global: Religious Liberty, Topic: Islam
|
Latest Posts
-
www.lifenews.com
05/21/2013
LifeNews: What do established sources say about the survival rates of babies born at various stages of gestation?
-
cnsnews.com
05/21/2013
CNSNews: “Now stop to think about it – the government getting involved in somebody having a prayer meeting. It appears that the IRS essentially offered this group a quid pro quo – You can become a charity if you don’t protest in front of a Planned Parenthood, generally speaking so you don’t have to worry about 6103,” Grassley said.
-
www.catholicculture.org
05/21/2013
Catholic Culture: In recent weeks, Islamist rebels who assumed power in the Central African Republic in March have kidnapped the rector of the cathedral in the nation’s capital as well as the archdiocesan chancelloor.
|