<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Alliance Alert &#187; Bench &amp; Bar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancealert.org/category/8-judiciary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancealert.org</link>
	<description>news from the frontlines of the culture war</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:06:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>McConnell To Reid: If You Go Nuclear On Nominations, I’ll Go Nuclear On Everything When I’m Majority Leader</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/18/mcconnell-to-reid-if-you-go-nuclear-on-nominations-ill-go-nuclear-on-everything-when-im-majority-leader/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/18/mcconnell-to-reid-if-you-go-nuclear-on-nominations-ill-go-nuclear-on-everything-when-im-majority-leader/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=167190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/06/mcconnell-reid-nuclear-option-filibuster.php">Talking Points Memo</a>: Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) on Tuesday starkly warned Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) not to eliminate the filibuster on presidential nominations, threatening to end the 60-vote threshold for everything, including bills, if he becomes the majority leader. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/18/mcconnell-to-reid-if-you-go-nuclear-on-nominations-ill-go-nuclear-on-everything-when-im-majority-leader/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/18/mcconnell-to-reid-if-you-go-nuclear-on-nominations-ill-go-nuclear-on-everything-when-im-majority-leader/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court to resolve circuit split on timing of appeals</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/18/supreme-court-to-resolve-circuit-split-on-timing-of-appeals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/18/supreme-court-to-resolve-circuit-split-on-timing-of-appeals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=167187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Legal/News/2013/06_-_June/Supreme_Court_to_resolve_circuit_split_on_timing_of_appeals/">Reuters</a>: The case, Ray Haluch Gravel v. Central Pension Fund, raises the question of whether a federal district court's ruling on the merits that leaves unresolved a request for contractual attorneys' fees is a final decision - and thus appealable - or whether the decision is not appealable until the court has ruled on contractual attorneys' fees.  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/18/supreme-court-to-resolve-circuit-split-on-timing-of-appeals/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/18/supreme-court-to-resolve-circuit-split-on-timing-of-appeals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law School Application Reductions, Last Minute Scholarships</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/18/law-school-application-reductions-last-minute-scholarships/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/18/law-school-application-reductions-last-minute-scholarships/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Colleges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=167099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/greedy_associates/2013/06/law-school-application-reductions-last-minute-scholarships.html?DCMP=NWL-pro_top">Findlaw</a>: We’ve pontificated a bit about the decrease in applications, applicants, and demand for law school seats. We’ve also speculated on what that means for wannabe-lawyers. Now, we’re getting concrete examples of the fallout from the law school bubble-burst. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/18/law-school-application-reductions-last-minute-scholarships/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/18/law-school-application-reductions-last-minute-scholarships/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate Dems Schedule Hearing For D.C. Circuit Nominee Patricia Millett</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/18/senate-dems-schedule-hearing-for-d-c-circuit-nominee-patricia-millett/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/18/senate-dems-schedule-hearing-for-d-c-circuit-nominee-patricia-millett/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=167078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/senate-dems-schedule-hearing-for-dc-circuit-nominee">Talking Points Memo</a>: Senate Democrats moved Monday to schedule a confirmation hearing for Patricia Millett, one of President Obama's three nominees to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/18/senate-dems-schedule-hearing-for-d-c-circuit-nominee-patricia-millett/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/18/senate-dems-schedule-hearing-for-d-c-circuit-nominee-patricia-millett/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pa. high court rejects changing mandatory retirement for judges</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/18/pa-high-court-rejects-changing-mandatory-retirement-for-judges/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/18/pa-high-court-rejects-changing-mandatory-retirement-for-judges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Pennsylvania]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=167075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/local/state/pa-high-court-rejects-changing-mandatory-retirement-for-judges-692087/">Pittsburgh Post-Gazette</a>: The state Supreme Court Monday found that judges challenging Pennsylvania's mandatory retirement age had no legitimate claim and instead said that the proper way to change it is through constitutional amendment. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/18/pa-high-court-rejects-changing-mandatory-retirement-for-judges/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/18/pa-high-court-rejects-changing-mandatory-retirement-for-judges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Is a FISA Court?</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/17/what-is-a-fisa-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/17/what-is-a-fisa-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=166955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/law_and_life/2013/06/what-is-a-fisa-court.html?DCMP=NWL-pro_top">Findlaw</a>: With <a title="Three Things to Know About the NSA Verizon Surveillance Scandal" href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/technologist/2013/06/three-things-to-know-about-the-nsa-verizon-surveillance-scandal.html" target="_blank">NSA surveillance</a> all over the news, you may be wondering: What is FISA? The <a title="US Code - Chapter 36: Foreign intelligence surveillance" href="http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/50/36" target="_blank">Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)</a> regulates the government's conduct of intelligence surveillance inside the United States. The law generally requires the government to seek warrants before surveilling "agents of a foreign power" engaged in espionage or terrorism. In practice, it grants the government wide surveillance authority.

Below is a general overview about what FISA is and what the FISA court does. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/17/what-is-a-fisa-court/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/17/what-is-a-fisa-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reading the Tea Leaves on the Supreme Court’s Outstanding Cases</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/17/reading-the-tea-leaves-on-the-supreme-courts-outstanding-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/17/reading-the-tea-leaves-on-the-supreme-courts-outstanding-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=166924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Elwood at the <a href="http://www.volokh.com/2013/06/17/reading-the-tea-leaves-on-the-supreme-courts-outstanding-cases/">Volokh Conspiracy</a>: Predictions are hard–especially about the future.  But it looks like Justice Alito probably was assigned the Bartlett opinion, and the Chief Justice and Kennedy are splitting DOMA and Prop 8.  Now who has which, and what are they writing? <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/17/reading-the-tea-leaves-on-the-supreme-courts-outstanding-cases/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/17/reading-the-tea-leaves-on-the-supreme-courts-outstanding-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservatives likely to write most remaining decisions in Supreme Court’s term</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/17/conservatives-likely-to-write-most-remaining-decisions-in-supreme-courts-term/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/17/conservatives-likely-to-write-most-remaining-decisions-in-supreme-courts-term/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=166918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert Barnes at the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/conservatives-likely-to-write-most-remaining-decisions-in-supreme-courts-term/2013/06/16/b2fb19a0-d529-11e2-8cbe-1bcbee06f8f8_story.html">Washington Post</a>: That’s not an accusation of sloth but a reflection of reality. As the court heads into the crucial final weeks of the term, it is apparent that the great majority of remaining decisions will be authored by the court’s most consistent conservatives. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/17/conservatives-likely-to-write-most-remaining-decisions-in-supreme-courts-term/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/17/conservatives-likely-to-write-most-remaining-decisions-in-supreme-courts-term/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5th Circuit Judge: Accused of Speaking of the Primacy of Religion Above Law</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/17/5th-circuit-judge-accused-of-speaking-of-the-primacy-of-religion-above-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/17/5th-circuit-judge-accused-of-speaking-of-the-primacy-of-religion-above-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 5th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: Alliance for Justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=166912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2013/06/judge-jones-misconduct-complaint.html">Religion Clause Blog</a>: On Thursday, Alliance for Justice submitted a letter (<a href="http://www.afj.org/judicial-selection/edith_jones_letter.pdf">full text</a>) in support of the misconduct complaint to the chief judge of the D.C. Circuit. It says that there is a long pattern of prejudicial statements and actions by Judge Jones, including her repeatedly speaking of the primacy of religion above law. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/17/5th-circuit-judge-accused-of-speaking-of-the-primacy-of-religion-above-law/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/17/5th-circuit-judge-accused-of-speaking-of-the-primacy-of-religion-above-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACLU: Obama Worse Than Bush On Civil Liberty Issues</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/14/aclu-obama-worse-than-bush-on-civil-liberty-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/14/aclu-obama-worse-than-bush-on-civil-liberty-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 18:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group: ACLU]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=166797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.10tv.com/content/stories/2013/06/14/columbus-aclu-says-obama-worse-than-bush-on-sivil-liberty-issues.html">10TV.com</a>: The associate director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio says the Obama administration is worse than its predecessor on issues of transparency. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/14/aclu-obama-worse-than-bush-on-civil-liberty-issues/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/14/aclu-obama-worse-than-bush-on-civil-liberty-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A note about opinion distribution at the U.S. Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/14/a-note-about-opinion-distribution-at-the-u-s-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/14/a-note-about-opinion-distribution-at-the-u-s-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 15:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=166727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2013/06/a-note-about-opinion-distribution/">SCOTUS Blog</a>: Trying to predict the author of any given Supreme Court opinion is often a fool’s errand.  The pattern by which Justices are assigned opinions isn’t entirely fixed.  And the original author can lose the majority to some other member of the Court. That said, across an entire Term, the Chief Justice — who does most of the opinion assignments, because he generally is in the majority — does attempt to distribute the workload evenly.  If that pattern holds this Term as well, then one feature of the remaining cases is noteworthy. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/14/a-note-about-opinion-distribution-at-the-u-s-supreme-court/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/14/a-note-about-opinion-distribution-at-the-u-s-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rare formal review ordered for federal judge</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/13/rare-formal-review-ordered-for-federal-judge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/13/rare-formal-review-ordered-for-federal-judge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 21:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 5th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: DC Circuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=166664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Rare-formal-review-ordered-for-federal-judge-4597601.php">Houston Chronicle</a>: Chief Justice John Roberts of the U.S. Supreme Court formally ordered on Wednesday that a rare public judicial misconduct complaint against 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Edith Jones be reviewed by officials in a different circuit — one based in the nation's capital. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/13/rare-formal-review-ordered-for-federal-judge/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/13/rare-formal-review-ordered-for-federal-judge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Campaign Contributions Influence State Courts</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/13/report-campaign-contributions-influence-state-courts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/13/report-campaign-contributions-influence-state-courts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 21:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=166661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202603806169&#38;slreturn=20130513170422">National Law Journal</a>: A <a href="http://www.acslaw.org/ACS%20Justice%20at%20Risk%20(FINAL)%206_10_13.pdf">study released on Tuesday</a> by the American Constitution Society for Law and Policy identified a "statistically significant" relationship between ballooning campaign contributions by business interest to state supreme court candidates and pro-business decisions by those courts. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/13/report-campaign-contributions-influence-state-courts/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/13/report-campaign-contributions-influence-state-courts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corbett plans to pick Stevens for Pa. high court</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/13/corbett-plans-to-pick-stevens-for-pa-high-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/13/corbett-plans-to-pick-stevens-for-pa-high-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 20:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Pennsylvania]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=166646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2013/06/supreme_court_nominee.html">PennLive.com</a>: Gov. Tom Corbett plans to nominate state appeals court Judge Correale F. Stevens to temporarily fill a vacancy on the state Supreme Court. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/13/corbett-plans-to-pick-stevens-for-pa-high-court/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/13/corbett-plans-to-pick-stevens-for-pa-high-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge&#8217;s New Job Opens Seat on D.C. Federal Court</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/13/judges-new-job-opens-seat-on-d-c-federal-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/13/judges-new-job-opens-seat-on-d-c-federal-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 20:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: District of Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=166643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2013/06/judges-new-job-opens-seat-on-dc-federal-court.html?kw=Judge%27s%20New%20Job%20Opens%20Seat%20on%20D.C.%20Federal%20Court&#038;et=editorial&#038;bu=National%20Law%20Journal&#038;cn=20130613&#038;src=EMC-Email&#038;pt=Legal%20Times%20Afternoon%20Update">Blog of the Legal Times</a>: Earlier this week, Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. announced he was tapping U.S. District Judge John Bates to lead the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. Bates is expected to continue serving as an active judge, but his appointment has created a new seat on Washington’s federal trial court for the White House to fill. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/13/judges-new-job-opens-seat-on-d-c-federal-court/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/13/judges-new-job-opens-seat-on-d-c-federal-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Court: U.S. Supreme Court plaza ordered open to protests</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/13/federal-court-u-s-supreme-court-plaza-ordered-open-to-protests/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/13/federal-court-u-s-supreme-court-plaza-ordered-open-to-protests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Hodge v. Talkin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=166547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2013/06/court-plaza-ordered-open-to-protests/#more-164826">SCOTUS Blog</a>: A federal judge in Washington on Wednesday took away part of the Supreme Court’s power to limit picketing, protests, and other demonstrations on the marble plaza at the front of its building on Capitol Hill.  The judge voided all of the sixty-four-year-old law at issue, but then said she meant her ruling to apply only to the plaza even though the law sweeps more broadly than that.   The judge’s opinion is <a href="http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Hodge-ruling.pdf">here.</a> <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/13/federal-court-u-s-supreme-court-plaza-ordered-open-to-protests/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/13/federal-court-u-s-supreme-court-plaza-ordered-open-to-protests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice O’Connor’s Hypocritical Crusade Against Judicial Elections</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/11/justice-oconnors-hypocritical-crusade-against-judicial-elections/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/11/justice-oconnors-hypocritical-crusade-against-judicial-elections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 22:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=166529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/350694/justice-oconnors-hypocritical-crusade-against-judicial-elections-carrie-severino">National Review Bench Memos</a>: This is a favorite talking point of George Soros and his allies, who want to replace judicial elections with the trial-lawyer dominated “merit” selection method. The only problem is the empirical evidence doesn’t support Justice O’Connor’s conclusion.  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/11/justice-oconnors-hypocritical-crusade-against-judicial-elections/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/11/justice-oconnors-hypocritical-crusade-against-judicial-elections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judicial Selection Reform: All Over The Map</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/11/judicial-selection-reform-all-over-the-map/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/11/judicial-selection-reform-all-over-the-map/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 16:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=166432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.wiggin.com/14389">Wiggin and Dana</a>: States are unlikely to reach consensus, so they should aim to reduce role of money, regardless of selection method. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/11/judicial-selection-reform-all-over-the-map/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/11/judicial-selection-reform-all-over-the-map/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Misconduct Charges Against 5th Circuit Judge Include Her Religious Justifications For Capital Punishment</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/11/misconduct-charges-against-5th-circuit-judge-include-her-religious-justifications-for-capital-punishment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/11/misconduct-charges-against-5th-circuit-judge-include-her-religious-justifications-for-capital-punishment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 16:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 5th Circuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=166429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2013/06/misconduct-charges-against-5th-circuit.html">Religion Clause Blog</a>: As reported by the <a href="http://www.austinchronicle.com/news/2013-06-07/judge-edith-jones-on-race-crime-and-gods-vengeance/">Austin Chronicle</a> and <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2013/06/10/58356.htm">Courthouse News Service</a>, six civil rights groups and seven individuals, most with special expertise in legal ethics, last week filed judicial misconduct charges against U.S. 5th Circuit Judge Edith Jones primarily over comments she made in a lecture titled "Federal Death Penalty Review." <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/11/misconduct-charges-against-5th-circuit-judge-include-her-religious-justifications-for-capital-punishment/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/11/misconduct-charges-against-5th-circuit-judge-include-her-religious-justifications-for-capital-punishment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indiana Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Oral Arguments in Brewington</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/indiana-supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-oral-arguments-in-brewington/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/indiana-supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-oral-arguments-in-brewington/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Indiana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=166275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.volokh.com/2013/06/07/indiana-supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-oral-arguments-in-brewington/">Volokh Conspiracy</a>: After this decision, Brewington posted various items online “discussing Judge Humphrey, in which he described the judge as ‘corrupt,’ and accused him of engaging in ‘unethical/illegal behavior.’ He also repeatedly referred to the judge as a child abuser.” Brewington was then prosecuted for, among other things, violating <a href="http://www.ai.org/legislative/ic/code/title35/ar45/ch2.html">Indiana Code § 35-45-2-1</a>, which (in relevant part) criminalizes as “intimidation” . . .  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/indiana-supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-oral-arguments-in-brewington/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/indiana-supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-oral-arguments-in-brewington/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former Supreme Court Justice Stevens predicts court will overturn Defense of Marriage Act</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/former-supreme-court-justice-stevens-predicts-court-will-overturn-defense-of-marriage-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/former-supreme-court-justice-stevens-predicts-court-will-overturn-defense-of-marriage-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Hollingsworth v. Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Windsor v. United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF: 26561]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF: 33121]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=166265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2013/06/06/mpr_news_presents">MPR</a>: Former U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens shares his views on controversial court decisions and the inner workings of the court, in a candid interview at the JFK Library in Boston May 20, 2013. Stevens comments on Bush v. Gore, Citizens United, affirmative action and same-sex marriage. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/former-supreme-court-justice-stevens-predicts-court-will-overturn-defense-of-marriage-act/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/former-supreme-court-justice-stevens-predicts-court-will-overturn-defense-of-marriage-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Happened to Eric Holder?</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/what-happened-to-eric-holder/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/what-happened-to-eric-holder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agency: Department of Justice (DOJ)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=166262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/what-happened-to-eric-holder-20130607">National Journal</a>: He was a Reagan-appointed judge and a Clinton-appointed prosecutor respected by both sides. Then it all fell apart. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/what-happened-to-eric-holder/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/what-happened-to-eric-holder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three questions for Clarence Thomas &#124; CNN</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/three-questions-for-clarence-thomas-cnn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/three-questions-for-clarence-thomas-cnn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=166256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/09/us/clarence-thomas-three-questions/index.html">CNN</a>: There may seem to be a contradiction between the <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/07/us/clarence-thomas-fast-facts/index.html" target="_blank">Clarence Thomas</a> who was the angry campus radical in the 1960s and the conservative hero who sits on the Supreme Court today. But some legal observers say Thomas sees himself as a "prophetic civil rights leader" who is still fighting for the same cause -- a colorblind America. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/three-questions-for-clarence-thomas-cnn/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/three-questions-for-clarence-thomas-cnn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Culture war creates perils for Supreme Court justices &#124; Juan Williams at The Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/culture-war-creates-perils-for-supreme-court-justices-juan-williams-at-the-hill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/culture-war-creates-perils-for-supreme-court-justices-juan-williams-at-the-hill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Marriage and Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Hollingsworth v. Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Windsor v. United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF: 26561]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZADF: 33121]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=166248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Juan Williams at <a href="http://thehill.com/opinion/columnists/juan-williams/304391-opinion-culture-war-creates-perils-for-supreme-court-justices">The Hill</a>: It is difficult to see how the Chief Justice arrives at such a consensus with these four culture war cases. It is more likely the decisions will give way to even more heated emotions, including anger and a further erosion of trust in yet another major American institution. 
 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/culture-war-creates-perils-for-supreme-court-justices-juan-williams-at-the-hill/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/culture-war-creates-perils-for-supreme-court-justices-juan-williams-at-the-hill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCOTUS Blog FAQs: Opinion announcement days</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/scotus-blog-faqs-opinion-announcement-days/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/scotus-blog-faqs-opinion-announcement-days/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=166247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2013/06/faqs-opinion-announcement-days/">SCOTUS Blog</a>: We have put together a list of some of the commonly asked questions about opinion announcements that we have gotten during recent live blogs, along with our responses, but please let us know during the live blog if you have a question that you don’t see answered here.   <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/scotus-blog-faqs-opinion-announcement-days/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/scotus-blog-faqs-opinion-announcement-days/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Exhibit A for a Major Shift: Justices’ Gay Clerks&#8221; &#124; NYT</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/exhibit-a-for-a-major-shift-justices-gay-clerks-nyt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/exhibit-a-for-a-major-shift-justices-gay-clerks-nyt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=166243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adam Liptak at <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/09/us/exhibit-a-for-a-major-shift-justices-gay-clerks.html?hp&#038;_r=1&#038;">NY Times</a>: Although no comprehensive record of gay Supreme Court law clerks exists, Joyce Murdoch and Deb Price — authors of “Courting Justice,” a 2001 history of gay rights cases at the court — identified 18 gay men and four lesbians who had been clerks. Ms. Murdoch and Ms. Price also found that the justice most likely to hire gay clerks was the one who said he had never met a homosexual. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/exhibit-a-for-a-major-shift-justices-gay-clerks-nyt/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/exhibit-a-for-a-major-shift-justices-gay-clerks-nyt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today&#8217;s Supreme Court Order List</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/todays-supreme-court-order-list-9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/todays-supreme-court-order-list-9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 13:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Docs: Orders]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=166237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The list is <a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/061013zor_7khn.pdf">here</a>. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/todays-supreme-court-order-list-9/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/10/todays-supreme-court-order-list-9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Disturbing Story About Judge Edith Jones &#124; Gerard Bradley at NRO</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/07/a-disturbing-story-about-judge-edith-jones-gerard-bradley-at-nro/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/07/a-disturbing-story-about-judge-edith-jones-gerard-bradley-at-nro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 23:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Religious Liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: 5th Circuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=166222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gerard Bradley at <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/350399/disturbing-story-about-judge-edith-jones-gerard-v-bradley">NRO</a>: They say that Jones said something like “Death penalties serve the condemned by forcing them to face God.”  Well, of course they do — if there is indeed a God. I believe there is, and until I read this story, I thought Judge Jones had a “civil right” to believe there is, too. Most religions maintain that after death there is some sort of divine judgment. Surely Christianity maintains that it is so.  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/07/a-disturbing-story-about-judge-edith-jones-gerard-bradley-at-nro/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/07/a-disturbing-story-about-judge-edith-jones-gerard-bradley-at-nro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Winners and Losers Of The Great Law School Application Reduction</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/07/winners-and-losers-of-the-great-law-school-application-reduction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/07/winners-and-losers-of-the-great-law-school-application-reduction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 22:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Colleges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=166213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://abovethelaw.com/2013/06/winners-and-losers-of-the-great-law-school-application-reduction/">Above the Law</a>: Chaos is a ladder. And right now, the legal education business is chaotic. Prospective law students are starting to wise up to the law school game. Applications have been dropping as law schools struggle to explain how it makes sense to go deep into debt just to participate in a very challenging job market.  <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/07/winners-and-losers-of-the-great-law-school-application-reduction/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/07/winners-and-losers-of-the-great-law-school-application-reduction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sotomayor Reports $1.9 Million in Income from Royalties</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/07/sotomayor-reports-1-9-million-in-income-from-royalties/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/07/sotomayor-reports-1-9-million-in-income-from-royalties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 19:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=166164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2013/06/sotomayor-reports-19-million-in-income-from-book-royalties.html?kw=Sotomayor%20Reports%20%241.9%20Million%20in%20Income%20from%20Royalties&#038;et=editorial&#038;bu=National%20Law%20Journal&#038;cn=20130607&#038;src=EMC-Email&#038;pt=Legal%20Times%20Afternoon%20Update">Blog of the Legal Times</a>: Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor's bestselling memoir about growing up in poverty has earned her more than $3 million, including $1.9 million in advances on royalties she received last year. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/07/sotomayor-reports-1-9-million-in-income-from-royalties/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/07/sotomayor-reports-1-9-million-in-income-from-royalties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abortion emerges as an issue in filibuster fight</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/07/abortion-emerges-as-an-issue-in-filibuster-fight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/07/abortion-emerges-as-an-issue-in-filibuster-fight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 19:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Sanctity of Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Nominations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=166155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/abortion-issue-filibuster-92313.html">Politico</a>: Changing the rules to make it easier to confirm President Barack Obama’s executive branch or judicial appointments may help the White House in the short term, and railing against Republican filibusters plays well with the Democratic base. But privately, that base and abortion rights supporters are concerned how a future GOP president and Senate could take advantage of the new setup.
 <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/07/abortion-emerges-as-an-issue-in-filibuster-fight/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/07/abortion-emerges-as-an-issue-in-filibuster-fight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Former Mass. Chief Justice On Life, Liberty And Gay Marriage&#8221; &#124; NPR</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/07/former-mass-chief-justice-on-life-liberty-and-gay-marriage-npr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/07/former-mass-chief-justice-on-life-liberty-and-gay-marriage-npr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 14:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=166065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.npr.org/2013/06/07/189288605/former-mass-chief-justice-on-life-liberty-and-gay-marriage">NPR</a>: I'm curious, when did it become unconstitutional to exclude homosexual couples from marriage? 1791? 1868, when the 14th Amendment was adopted?" Scalia asked. "When did the law become this?" Marshall says for her, the answer was clear: "When the states started giving huge benefits and privileges to one section of the population. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/07/former-mass-chief-justice-on-life-liberty-and-gay-marriage-npr/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/07/former-mass-chief-justice-on-life-liberty-and-gay-marriage-npr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Okla. Supremes throw out lawsuit reform measure as single subject violation</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/06/okla-supremes-throw-out-lawsuit-reform-measure-as-single-subject-violation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/06/okla-supremes-throw-out-lawsuit-reform-measure-as-single-subject-violation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 16:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State: Oklahoma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=165972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://howappealing.law.com/060613.html#051386">How Appealing links</a> to the ruling and media reports. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/06/okla-supremes-throw-out-lawsuit-reform-measure-as-single-subject-violation/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/06/okla-supremes-throw-out-lawsuit-reform-measure-as-single-subject-violation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ex-Profs: Phoenix Values Profits Over Students, Faculty</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/05/ex-profs-phoenix-values-profits-over-students-faculty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/05/ex-profs-phoenix-values-profits-over-students-faculty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 18:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Colleges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topic: Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=165862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202602752758&#038;ExProfs_Phoenix_Values_Profits_Over_Students_Faculty&#038;slreturn=20130505143328">National Law Journal</a>: Two former tenured professors have sued the Phoenix School of Law and the company that owns it, claiming that they were improperly fired after raising concerns about what they called a drive for profits at the expense of students and faculty. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/05/ex-profs-phoenix-values-profits-over-students-faculty/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/05/ex-profs-phoenix-values-profits-over-students-faculty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scalia Dissents On Scotus Decision Upholding DNA Samples Of Arrested &#124; Ken Klukowski at Breitbart</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/04/scalia-dissents-on-scotus-decision-upholding-dna-samples-of-arrested/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/04/scalia-dissents-on-scotus-decision-upholding-dna-samples-of-arrested/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bench & Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Category: Bench and Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court: U.S. Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZZ: Maryland v. King]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancealert.org/?p=165607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ken Klukowski at <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/06/03/SCOTUS-Upholds-Taking-DNA-Samples-of-Those-Arrested-for-Felonies">Breitbart</a>: Constitutional protections do not forbid police from taking DNA samples from those arrested for serious crimes, according to the Supreme Court in its 5-4 decision Monday in Maryland v. King. <a href="http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/04/scalia-dissents-on-scotus-decision-upholding-dna-samples-of-arrested/"> <span class="meta-nav"></span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancealert.org/2013/06/04/scalia-dissents-on-scotus-decision-upholding-dna-samples-of-arrested/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
