Charles C.W. Cooke at National Review: If the Canadian Supreme Court is happy to indulge the prosecution of those whose speech apparently “opposes the targeted group’s ability to find self-fulfillment,” then I wonder if it wouldn’t also be happy to bring back Spectral Evidence, which William Stoughton allowed into his courtroom with such famous success at the Salem Witch Trials.
- Posted: 03/04/2013
- |
- Category: Global: Bench and Bar
- |
- Source: www.nationalreview.com
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: Canada, Docs: Opinion, Global: Bench and Bar, Global: Religious Liberty, Group: Canadian Constitution Foundation, Group: Catholic Civil Rights League, Topic: Hate Speech, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, ZZ: Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission (SHRC) v. Whatcott
Pascal Emmanuel Gobry at The American Scene: But of course, as any freshman philosophy student can tell, the problem comes when you try to ground those universal human rights. Where do they come from? Who confers them? Why should they be respected? There’s basically only two ways to do so, one theistic and one non-theistic. Universal human rights are perfectly grounded if they come from God, as the Declaration of Independence asserts and as I believe in my heart of hearts. But not everybody likes that, and it sort of defeats the purpose of creating this secular moral system to begin with. The only other way that I’m aware of to ground the idea of universal human rights is in, wait for it, the natural law.
- Posted: 02/27/2013
- |
- Category: Global: Bench and Bar
- |
- Source: theamericanscene.com
- Tags: Global: Bench and Bar, Topic: Jurisprudence, Topic: Natural Law, Topic: Philosophy
Turtle Bay and Beyond: Today’s “globalistas” rarely expose their material interests to public debate, but rather couch their aims in terms of “universal human rights.” At first these seem noble enough, ridding the world of slavery and genocide, but the system of global governance by its nature ever expands its reach. Forty percent of the UK’s parliamentary agenda simply rubber stamped laws already set by the EU, a legislator told Fonte, and the figure was some 60-70% in Austria. The European Union is both the world’s best example of global governance, and its most powerful proponent at UN conferences.
- Posted: 10/18/2012
- |
- Category: Global: Bench and Bar
- |
- Source: www.turtlebayandbeyond.org
- Tags: Category: Global, Global: Bench and Bar, Topic: International Law
4-traders.com: Current legal issues in Latin America, election crime and punishment, and same-sex marriage are among the topics that will be discussed at the American Bar AssociationSection of International Law’s Fall Meeting. The Oct. 16 – 20 meeting will bring together legal practitioners from government, academia and private practice to Miami. Some 1,000 lawyers from 47 countries, including the United States, are expected at the meeting.
- Posted: 10/04/2012
- |
- Category: Global: Bench and Bar
- |
- Source: www.4-traders.com
- Tags: Category: Bench and Bar, Global: Marriage and Family, Group: American Bar Association (ABA), Topic: Homosexual Agenda, Topic: Marriage
|

Latest Posts
-
www.nationalreview.com
05/20/2013
National Review: Sam Kazman and Michael Carvin have a great Forbes op-ed about their new Obamacare lawsuit, which could invalidate key portions of the law in the 33 states that did not set-up state-based health-insurance exchanges. Essentially, the lawsuit alleges that the IRS illegally rewrote the Affordable Care Act so that both the employer mandate and accompanying government subsidies applied in the 33 states that lack their own health-insurance exchanges . . . You can read the complaint here.
-
hosted.ap.org
05/20/2013
AP: Senior members of the Church of Scotland voted Monday to let some congregations choose ministers who are in same-sex relationships – an important compromise that must still pass further hurdles before it can become church law.
-
www.frc.org
05/20/2013
FRC Washington Update: After the ACLU filed a second lawsuit, Barronelle turned to our friends at Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF). Together, they’re countersuing Washington for violating her Christian beliefs. “Marriage has religious significance,” ADF argues, “apart from any civil significance. [Stutzman] believed that [servicing a gay marriage] would compel her to express a message with her creativity that violates God’s commands.”

|