Sydney Morning Herald: “The NSW’s Surrogacy Act, which was passed in November but has not yet come into force, will impose penalties of two years’ jail, a $110,000 fine, or both on parents who pay for a surrogate here or abroad to carry their child . . . Commercial surrogacy is illegal in Australia. But under the new law, NSW residents face prosecution for using commercial surrogacy overseas.”
- Posted: 01/19/2011
- |
- Category: Global: Sanctity of Life
- |
- Source: www.smh.com.au
- Tags: Category: Global, Global: Marriage and Family, Global: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Bioethics, Topic: Legislation, Topic: Surrogacy
Jonathan Mirsky reviews [full text via Google News] Cultivating Global Citizens: Population in the Rise of China “By Susan Greenhalgh in the Wall Street Journal: “In the quest for ‘superior’ children and mothers, Ms. Greenhalgh explains, Beijing put aside social, cultural and political factors, and discriminated against whole classes of low-quality people . . . Official pressure to curtail and ‘improve’ births resulted in infanticide and selective abortion, which in turn led to a gender gap among newborns of at best 120 boys to 100 girls. Many Chinese men, therefore, will not find brides, and fewer elderly Chinese will have daughters to comfort and support them.”
- Posted: 01/05/2011
- |
- Category: Global: Sanctity of Life
- |
- Source: online.wsj.com
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: China, Global: Marriage and Family, Global: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion, Topic: Demographics, Topic: Eugenics
E. Christian Brugger writes at the Culture of Life Foundation: “The bioethics website BioEdge (www.bioedge.org) just reported that an appeal’s court in Belgium recently upheld a similar suit brought by parents against doctors on behalf of their disabled son. The Court of Appeal of Brussels ruled that because of a faulty prenatal diagnosis, which led to a disabled boy being born, the doctors ‘have injured [the boy’s] certain and legitimate interest in being the object of a therapeutic abortion.’ In other words, the boy had a right to be killed through abortion, and that right was violated when, because of the doctors’ misdiagnosis, he was born alive.”
- Posted: 12/21/2010
- |
- Category: Global: Sanctity of Life
- |
- Source: culture-of-life.org
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: Belgium, Global: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion
Lord Nicholas Windsor writing at First Things: “Is it still possible then that we can point to anything of any real significance that had been overlooked, anything dangerous smuggled into this new phase of history that has caught us unawares? I would say that this is indeed the case, and I would like to focus especially on a matter and a practice that constitutes the single most grievous moral deficit in contemporary life: the abortion of our unborn children . . . All else that we concern ourselves with in the lives of human beings derives from the inescapable fact that first we must have human lives with which to concern ourselves. By disregarding this self-evident fact of the debt owed immediately to the unborn—which is to be allowed to be born (and let us not forget that all of us might have suffered just the same fate before our birth)—humanity’s deepest instincts are trampled and shattered.”
- Posted: 12/21/2010
- |
- Category: Global: Sanctity of Life
- |
- Source: www.firstthings.com
- Tags: Global: Sanctity of Life, Topic: Abortion
|
|