Charles C.W. Cooke at National Review: If the Canadian Supreme Court is happy to indulge the prosecution of those whose speech apparently “opposes the targeted group’s ability to find self-fulfillment,” then I wonder if it wouldn’t also be happy to bring back Spectral Evidence, which William Stoughton allowed into his courtroom with such famous success at the Salem Witch Trials.
- Posted: 03/04/2013
- |
- Category: Global: Bench and Bar
- |
- Source: www.nationalreview.com
- Tags: Category: Global, Country: Canada, Docs: Opinions, Global: Bench and Bar, Global: Religious Liberty, Group: Canadian Constitution Foundation, Group: Catholic Civil Rights League, Topic: Hate Speech, Topic: Homosexual Agenda, ZZ: Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission (SHRC) v. Whatcott
Pascal Emmanuel Gobry at The American Scene: But of course, as any freshman philosophy student can tell, the problem comes when you try to ground those universal human rights. Where do they come from? Who confers them? Why should they be respected? There’s basically only two ways to do so, one theistic and one non-theistic. Universal human rights are perfectly grounded if they come from God, as the Declaration of Independence asserts and as I believe in my heart of hearts. But not everybody likes that, and it sort of defeats the purpose of creating this secular moral system to begin with. The only other way that I’m aware of to ground the idea of universal human rights is in, wait for it, the natural law.
- Posted: 02/27/2013
- |
- Category: Global: Bench and Bar
- |
- Source: theamericanscene.com
- Tags: Global: Bench and Bar, Topic: Jurisprudence, Topic: Natural Law, Topic: Philosophy
Turtle Bay and Beyond: Today’s “globalistas” rarely expose their material interests to public debate, but rather couch their aims in terms of “universal human rights.” At first these seem noble enough, ridding the world of slavery and genocide, but the system of global governance by its nature ever expands its reach. Forty percent of the UK’s parliamentary agenda simply rubber stamped laws already set by the EU, a legislator told Fonte, and the figure was some 60-70% in Austria. The European Union is both the world’s best example of global governance, and its most powerful proponent at UN conferences.
- Posted: 10/18/2012
- |
- Category: Global: Bench and Bar
- |
- Source: www.turtlebayandbeyond.org
- Tags: Category: Global, Global: Bench and Bar, Topic: International Law
|

Latest Posts
-
www.christiannewswire.com
06/18/2013
Christian Newswire: Congressman Mark Meadows (R-NC) today introduced a resolution in the U.S. House to amend the United States Constitution to protect children and parents from governmental overreach. The proposed Parental Rights Amendment already has 40 original cosponsors. ParentalRights.org leads grassroots support for the measure.
-
www.lifenews.com
06/18/2013
LifeNews: The vote for the bill broke down on mostly partisan lines with Republicans supporting the ban on late-term abortions and Democrats opposing it. The House approved the bill on a 229-195 vote with 7 Democrats voting for the bill and 6 Republicans voting against it. The bill, if it receives a vote in the Democrat-controlled Senate, is not expected to pass and pro-abortion President Barack Obama has issued a veto threat.
-
www.lifesitenews.com
06/18/2013
LifeSiteNews: The Chinese government has given notice to citizens of the city Huizhou that all women of childbearing age must be fitted with Intrauterine Devices (IUDs) or be permanently sterilized via tubal ligations.

|