Tag Archives: ADF: Jim Campbell

Politicians should not be able to nullify a democratic act of the people by refusing to defend it,” said Alliance Defense Fund Litigation Staff Counsel Jim Campbell. “The people of California have a right to be defended, so the official proponents of Proposition 8 must be allowed to step in and defend that law. Otherwise, state officials will succeed in indirectly invalidating a measure that they had no power to strike down directly.”

Westlaw News & Insight: “For the opponents of gay marriage: James Campbell of Alliance Defense Fund; Charles Cooper, Nicole Moss, Jesse Panuccio, David Thompson and Peter Patterson of Cooper & Kirk; Andrew Pugno; Brian Raum.”

One News Now: The Ninth Circuit asked the high court this month whether California law allows Proposition 8 proponents the right to defend the measure when state officials refuse to . . . “Politicians should not be able to nullify a democratic act of the people by refusing their duty to defend it,” contends Jim Campbell, litigation staff council for the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF). “The people of California have a right to be defended.”

SEO Law Firm: “Alliance Defense Fund Litigation Counsel [Jim Campbell] said of the issue, ‘The people of California have the right to be defended, and thus the official proponents of Proposition 8 must have standing to defend that law. Otherwise, the governor and attorney general will succeed in indirectly invalidating a measure that they had no power to strike down directly.’”

Michael Foust reports at Baptist Press: “‘Politicians should not be able to nullify a democratic act of the people by refusing their duty to defend it,’ Alliance Defense Fund attorney [Jim Campbell] said.”

The Christian Post: “‘Politicians should not be able to nullify a democratic act of the people by refusing their duty to defend it,’ [ADF Attorney Jim Campbell] said in a statement. ‘The people of California have the right to be defended, and thus the official proponents of Proposition 8 must have standing to defend that law.’”

WorldNetDaily: “Judges on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals today turned over to the California Supreme Court a question that ultimately could determine whether a homosexual judge’s decision to revoke voters’ definition of marriage as a union of one man and one woman only stands or falls . . . ‘Politicians should not be able to nullify a democratic act of the people by refusing their duty to defend it,’ said ADF Litigation Counsel Jim Campbell. ‘The people of California have the right to be defended, and thus the official proponents of Proposition 8 must have standing to defend that law.’”

Sacramento Bee: “In a key double ruling, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judges on Tuesday rejected Imperial County’s request to defend Proposition 8 in federal court – and asked the California Supreme Court for advice on whether the measure’s private proponents should have that right . . . ‘Politicians should not be able to nullify a democratic act of the people’ by refusing to defend it, said Proposition 8 attorney [Jim Campbell] of the religious-rights Alliance Defense Fund.”

California Catholic Daily: “‘With this recent development, the Alliance Defense Fund and the rest of the Protectmarriage.com legal team remain confident that the right of the people of California to protect marriage in their constitution will ultimately be honored,’ said [Jim Campbell].”

Carol J. Williams reports in the Los Angeles Times: “‘Politicians should not be able to nullify a democratic act of the people by refusing their duty to defend it,’ said Alliance Defense Fund Litigation Counsel [Jim Campbell]. ‘The people of California have the right to be defended, and thus the official proponents of Proposition 8 must have standing to defend that law. Otherwise, the governor and attorney general will succeed in indirectly invalidating a measure that they had no power to strike down directly.’”

San Francisco Examiner: “Another lawyer for the sponsors, [Jim Campbell] of the Arizona-based Alliance Defense Fund, said, ‘Politicians should not be able to nullify a democratic act of the people by refusing their duty to defend it.’”

Mercury News: “In a procedural order, a federal appeals court on Tuesday asked the state Supreme Court to tackle whether Proposition 8 backers have a legal right to appeal . . . ‘Politicians should not be able to nullify a democratic act of the people,’ said [Jim Campbell], an Alliance Defense Fund attorney.”

SF Appeal: “Another lawyer for the sponsors, [Jim Campbell] of the Arizona-based Alliance Defense Fund, said, ‘Politicians should not be able to nullify a democratic act of the people by refusing their duty to defend it. The people of California have the right to be defended, and thus the official proponents of Proposition 8 must have standing to defend that law.’”

“In a brief order filed Tuesday, a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals asked the California Supreme Court to decide if the backers of ballot propositions can step in to defend voter-approved measures in court when state officials refuse to do so.”

Video is here.

CBS 5 online here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBv2j2YMXTM | ABC 7 online here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4Xtmm_ktkg

The Oakland Tribune: “We remain very confident,” said James Campbell, a lawyer for the conservative Alliance Defense Fund. “The law is clearly on our side.”

ABC 30 HD: Attorney Jim Campbell of the alliance defense fund one of Prop 8′s proponents believes they have strong legal standing “The U.S Supreme Court has recognized that when a state court allows proponents to intervene when the Attorney General refuses to defend this law that the federal courts will do likewise,” said Campbell.

OneNewsNow: “Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) attorney [Jim Campbell] tells OneNewsNow 25 briefs were filed. ‘This is a very broad coalition, a very diverse show of support for the people of California and for people all throughout this country who continue to believe that marriage is a union of one man and one woman,’ Campbell suggests.”

OneNewsNow: “‘What the lower court said here in essence is that it violates the United States Constitution to define marriage and to preserve marriage as the union between a man and a woman,’ [ADF Attorney Jim Cambell] explains. ‘So if that decision were to be upheld, it could have ramifications throughout the entire country.’”

ADF attorney Jim Campbell appeared on Moody Radio, “In the Market” with Janet Parshall to discuss the California marriage litigation. | MP3 audio 14:54 mins

The Arizona Legislature acted “reasonably and constitutionally” when it decided last year to pass a law that once again distributes taxpayer-funded benefits for state employees on the basis of marital status. That’s the conclusion of a friend-of-the-court brief submitted to a federal court Monday by Alliance Defense Fund attorneys on behalf of Center for Arizona Policy.

WorldNetDaily: “The filing today came from the Alliance Defense Fund, which noted that the ruling from Judge Vaughn Walker, a homosexual, violates every precedent around. ‘The district court decision conflicts with every other appellate court ruling on the federal constitutionality of marriage, including the U.S. Supreme Court,’ said senior counsel [Brian Raum] . . . The brief even quoted Obama in establishing the body of authority that a moral issue such as marriage certainly can be addressed in the law.”

San Francisco Bay Times: “Supporters of same-sex marriage say the appeals court has put the matter on the fast track, which they believe helps the cause for equality . . . ‘It made no sense to impose a radical change in marriage on the people of California before all appeals on their behalf are heard, so the 9th Circuit’s decision is clearly the right call,’ stated pro-Prop 8 conservative Alliance Defense Fund Litigation Staff Counsel Jim Campbell. ‘Refusing to stay the decision would only have created more legal confusion surrounding any same-sex unions entered while the appeal is pending. This case has just begun.’”

ADF’s Weekly Update is on YouTube here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyGRgy6UjYM

WorldNetDaily: “The Supreme Court in California, which in 2008 ordered the creation of ‘same-sex marriage’ and was rebuffed within months by voters, now has refused to require that state officials follow the law and defend the constitutional mandate that marriage is only between one man and one woman . . . According to Staff Counsel [Jim Campbell] of the Alliance Defense Fund, one of the organizations arguing on behalf of traditional marriage advocate ProtectMarriage.com, the case really has just begun with Walker’s ruling.”

OneNewsNow: “Minneapolis has settled a lawsuit with a Christian psychologist after firing him because of his relationship with a pro-family group . . . Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) defended Campion, and attorney [Jim Campbell] contends that his client’s affiliation with the pro-family group should have nothing to do with his work for the city. ‘That is the exact point of this case. This settlement reinforces that the government shouldn’t penalize Christian contractors for their beliefs,’ he points out.”

WorldNetDaily: “With a court deadline looming in just days, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Attorney General Jerry Brown have filed court documents to fight demands from the Pacific Justice Institute that the state defend a constitutional amendment defining marriage as being between one man and one woman – only . . . According to Staff Counsel [Jim Campbell] of the Alliance Defense Fund, one of the organizations arguing on behalf of traditional marriage advocates ProtectMarriage.com, the case really has just begun with Walker’s ruling.”

WorldNetDaily: “A Christian psychologist suspended by Minneapolis because of his ties to a pro-family organization has agreed to a $210,000 settlement from the city . . . ‘This settlement reinforces that the government shouldn’t penalize Christian contractors for their beliefs,’ said ADF Litigation Staff Counsel [Jim Campbell], who argued the case on behalf of Campion last year in federal district court.” ADF News Release

The city “suspended” Dr. Michael Campion, a psychologist who performed employment testing for the city, shortly after city officials learned of his affiliation with a conservative Christian organization, the Illinois Family Institute.

Minneapolis Star-Tribune: “A psychologist who screened potential Minneapolis police officers will receive a $210,000 settlement from the city over his firing, which stemmed from his affiliation with the Illinois Family Institute and his support for treating the ‘problem’ of homosexuality . . . [Jim Campbell], of the Alliance Defense Fund of Arizona, said the settlement ‘reinforces that the government cannot penalize Christian contractors for their beliefs.’”

Little Chicago Review: “The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit Monday put the brakes on an August 18 implementation date for U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker’s order overthrowing the will of 7 million California voters with regard to marriage. ‘It made no sense to impose a radical change in marriage on the people of California before all appeals on their behalf are heard, so the 9th Circuit’s decision is clearly the right call,’ said ADF Litigation Staff Counsel [Jim Campbell].”

OneNewsNow: “Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) is representing Wisconsin Family Action in a lawsuit against the state over the definition of marriage . . . ‘Even though the people of Wisconsin clearly defined marriage in their state constitution as the union of one man and one woman, the state legislature has implemented a “domestic partnership” scheme that seeks to undermine that marriage amendment,’ explains ADF attorney [Jim Campbell].”

The Christian Century: “‘At bottom, our strategy here is, and has always been, that in this country we should respect the rights of the people when they do what they have always done: vote based on their religious and moral convictions,’ [ADF Attorney Jim Campbell] said. Abolitionists, antiabortion activists and civil rights activists have all been motivated by personal faith, Campbell argued. ‘To be blunt, we felt [Walker's decision] was an all-out attack on religion.’”

San Francisco Bay Times: ‘It made no sense to impose a radical change in marriage on the people of California before all appeals on their behalf are heard, so the 9th Circuit’s decision is clearly the right call,’ stated pro-Prop 8 conservative Alliance Defense Fund Litigation Staff Counsel [Jim Campbell]. ‘Refusing to stay the decision would only have created more legal confusion surrounding any same-sex unions entered while the appeal is pending. This case has just begun.’”

The Christian Institute: “[T]he Alliance Defense Fund (ADF), a religious liberty organisation which is involved in the case, welcomed the ruling. ADF’s [Jim Campbell] said: ‘It made no sense to impose a radical change in marriage on the people of California before all appeals on their behalf are heard, so the Ninth Circuit’s decision is clearly the right call.’”

Michael Foust reports at Baptist Press: “‘It made no sense to impose a radical change in marriage on the people of California before all appeals on their behalf are heard, so the Ninth Circuit’s decision is clearly the right call,’ said [Jim Campbell], an attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund, which is involved in the case. ‘Refusing to stay the decision would only have created more legal confusion surrounding any same-sex unions entered while the appeal is pending. This case has just begun.’”

Washington Blade: ‘It made no sense to impose a radical change in marriage on the people of California before all appeals on their behalf are heard,’ said [Jim Campbell], litigation staff counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund. ‘Refusing to stay the decision would only have created more legal confusion surrounding any same-sex unions entered while the appeal is pending . . . ADF and the rest of the legal team is confident that the right of Americans to protect marriage in their state constitutions will ultimately be upheld.’”

Catholic News Agency: “ADF litigation staff counsel [Jim Campbell] added that it ‘made no sense to impose a radical change in marriage on the people of California before all appeals on their behalf are heard, so the 9th Circuit’s decision is clearly the right call.’”

The Orange County Register (Total Buzz): ‘Refusing to stay the decision would only have created more legal confusion surrounding any same-sex unions entered while the appeal is pending,’ said [Jim Campbell] of the Alliance Defense Fund, which is helping defend Prop. 8.”

Worthy News: “‘It made no sense to impose a radical change in marriage on the people of California before all appeals on their behalf are heard,’ said Alliance Defense Fund’s Litigation Staff counsel [Jim Campbell]. ‘Refusing to stay the decision would only have created more legal confusion surrounding any same-sex unions entered while the appeal is pending. This case has just begun. ADF and the rest of the legal team are confident that the right of Americans to protect marriage in their state constitutions will ultimately be upheld.’”

California Beat: “The Alliance Defense Fund, a Christian group which opposes same-sex marriage, said the decision was ‘clearly the right call.’ ‘Refusing to stay the decision would only have created more legal confusion surrounding any same-sex unions entered while the appeal is pending,’ said attorney [Jim Campbell] in a statement posted to the group’s website.”

Los Angeles Times: “The Alliance Defense Fund, a Christian liberty group that is helping finance the defense of Proposition 8, called the 9th Circuit’s decision ‘clearly the right call.’ ‘Refusing to stay the decision would only have created more legal confusion surrounding any same-sex unions entered while the appeal is pending,’ said [Jim Campbell], the fund’s litigation counsel.”

USA Today / Faith & Reason: “The Alliance Defense Fund, part of the Prop8 legal support, is delighted with the ruling. It’s press release says, ‘This case has just begun. ADF and the rest of the legal team are confident that the right of Americans to protect marriage in their state constitutions will ultimately be upheld.’”

AFP: “Gay couples in California scrapped wedding plans Tuesday after a court halted same-sex unions until the completion of an appeals process expected to end up in the US Supreme Court . . . ‘If the trial court’s decision is eventually reversed, refusing to stay the decision will senselessly create legal uncertainty surrounding any same-sex unions entered while the appeal is pending,’ said [Jim Campbell], a lawyer for the Alliance Defense Fund, a socially conservative grouping.”

Ben Smith reports at Politico: “‘It made no sense to impose a radical change in marriage on the people of California before all appeals on their behalf are heard, so the 9th Circuit’s decision is clearly the right call,’ said conservative Alliance Defense Fund Litigation Staff Counsel [Jim Campbell].”

“The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit Monday put the brakes on an Aug. 18 implementation date for U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker’s order overthrowing the will of 7 million California voters with regard to marriage.”

ChristianWebNews: “ADF Litigation Staff Counsel [Jim Campbell]: ‘The Protectmarriage.com legal team will appeal immediately to the 9th Circuit to stay the trial court’s decision until this case is concluded. This case has just begun, and ADF and the rest of the legal team are confident that the right of Americans to protect marriage in their state constitutions will ultimately be upheld.’”

Christian Science Monitor: “Do proponents of Proposition 8, California’s gay-marriage ban, have any legal standing to appeal last week’s federal court ruling declaring it unconstitutional? . . . ‘[We] are confident that the right of Americans to protect marriage in their state constitutions will ultimately be upheld,’ said Alliance Defense Fund Litigation Staff Counsel [Jim Campbell] in a statement. ‘It makes no sense to impose a radical change in marriage on the people of California before all appeals on their behalf are heard.’”

Daniel Blomberg on KTXL Fox 40 (Video) – MP4 4:37 mins | Sara Tappen on the Georgene Rice Show – MP3 10:02 mins | Jim Campbell with David Lazarus on 89.3 KPCC, S. Cal. Public Radio – MP3 4:19 mins | Jim Campbell on KMJ with Chris Daniel – MP3 8 mins | Jim Campbell on KGO –  MP3 4:59 mins.

Associated Press: “‘We are confident we do have standing to seek the appellate review here, and we realize this case has just begun and we will get the decision overturned on appeal,’ said [Jim Campbell], an Alliance Defense Fund lawyer who is part of the legal team defending Proposition 8.” | Marriage advocates file Emergency Motion for Stay with the 9th Circuit

The Desert Sun: “David B. Cruz, a constitutional law expert and professor in the University of Southern California’s Gould School of Law, said the panel would have to consider if those pushing for Proposition 8 to remain in effect have the right to appeal the case in the first place . . . ‘We are confident we do have standing to seek the appellate review here, and we realize this case has just begun and we will get the decision overturned on appeal,’ said [Jim Campbell], an Alliance Defense Fund lawyer who is part of the legal team defending Proposition 8.”

Christian Science Monitor: “‘This case has just begun,’ said [Jim Campbell], a lawyer with the Alliance Defense Fund. He said the legal team was ‘confident that the right of Americans to protect marriage in their state constitutions will ultimately be upheld.’ . . . [Walker] went on in his 11-page order to question whether Proposition 8 proponents still have legal standing to pursue the case. California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Attorney General Jerry Brown have both announced that they will not seek an appeal in the case. They also declined to seek a stay of Walker’s ruling.”

Mercury News: “Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the UC Irvine law school, agreed with Walker’s conclusion that without the state defending the law, gay marriage foes may not have the right to appeal on their own . . . ikram Amar, a UC Davis law professor, disagreed, and said Walker may have botched the trial by allowing the Proposition 8 campaign to defend the state law if they didn’t have the legal right to do so. He said that could allow the 9th Circuit to duck the main issue altogether and ship the case back to Walker to start over . . . Proposition 8 lawyers say they have the right to defend the ban. Imperial County, where voters overwhelmingly backed the gay marriage ban, also is asking the 9th Circuit to allow it to appeal the ruling. ‘Just because state officials have refused to defend the law of the people they represent doesn’t mean that the people must be governed by the radical ideas of one judge in San Francisco,’ said [Jim Campbell], a lawyer for the Alliance Defense Fund.”

The Christian Post: “The Alliance Defense Fund, which has been defending California’s Prop. 8, announced immediately after Walker’s ruling that it would appeal to the 9th Circuit to stay the trial court’s decision until the case is concluded. ‘This case has just begun, and ADF and the rest of the legal team are confident that the right of Americans to protect marriage in their state constitutions will ultimately be upheld,’ remarked ADF Litigation Staff Counsel [Jim Campbell].”

BeliefNet (RNS): “‘This case has just begun, and ADF and the rest of the legal team are confident that the right of Americans to protect marriage in their state constitutions will ultimately be upheld,’ said [Jim Campbell], an ADF lawyer.”

OneNewsNow: “‘This case has just begun,’ states ADF litigation staff counsel [Jim Campbell], ‘and ADF and the rest of the legal team are confident that the right of Americans to protect marriage in their state constitutions will ultimately be upheld.’”

WorldNetDaily: “The comments came today from Randy Thomasson of the family-oriented SaveCalifornia.com after Judge Vaughn Walker decided he wanted same-sex marriages to resume in California on Aug. 18 . . . According to Staff Counsel [Jim Campbell] of the Alliance Defense Fund, one of the key organizations arguing on behalf of traditional marriage advocates ProtectMarriage.com, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is being asked immediately for a stay of Walker’s order.”

Mercury News: “San Mateo County officials said they stand ready to issue gay marriage licenses next week if a judge’s ruling Thursday to begin allowing same-sex unions isn’t put on hold again . . . [Jim Campbell], a lawyer for the Alliance Defense Fund, one of the groups defending Proposition 8, said they would ‘appeal immediately’ to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to block same-sex marriages from taking place while the appeal is pending. The broader legal challenge is expected to stretch for another year or two and ultimately reach the U.S. Supreme Court.”

New York Times: “‘It makes no sense to impose a radical change in marriage on the people of California before all appeals on their behalf are heard,’ [ADF Attorney Jim Campbell] said in a statement. ‘If the trial court’s decision is eventually reversed, refusing to stay the decision will senselessly create legal uncertainty surrounding any same-sex unions entered while the appeal is pending.’”

Catholic News Agency: “Reacting to the news on Thursday, ADF Litigation Staff Counsel [Jim Campbell] said that the ‘Protectmarriage.com legal team will appeal immediately to the 9th Circuit to stay the trial court’s decision until this case is concluded.’ ‘This case has just begun, and ADF and the rest of the legal team are confident that the right of Americans to protect marriage in their state constitutions will ultimately be upheld,’ Campbell added.”

“The Protectmarriage.com legal team will appeal immediately to the 9th Circuit to stay the trial court’s decision until this case is concluded.”

ADF attorney Jim Campbell appeared on several TV news reports in connection with the California marriage ruling. | KTVK 3 –  MP4 3:20 mins | Fox 10 AZ – MP4 7:39 mins | ABC 15 – MP4 2:02 mins

In the last week, ADF attorney Jim Campbell has made numerous appearances on radio to discuss the California marriage ruling. | 8/3 NPR 5:04 mins | 8/4 NPR 3:02 mins |  8/05 The Mitch Albom Show – MP3 7:08 mins

The Oklahoman (RNS): “Religion, in Walker’s reasoning, amounts to a “private moral view,” which should not infringe upon the constitutional rights of others . . . ‘At bottom, our strategy here is, and has always been, that in this country we should respect the rights of the people when they do what they have always done: vote based on their religious and moral convictions,’ ADF Attorney Jim Campbell] said.”

On 3TV Jim Campbell discusses the ruling’s potential impact on Arizona. | Austin R. Nimocks on CNN.

Austin R. Nimocks on the Vicki McKenna Show – MP3 16:39 mins | Austin with Kitty O’Neal on KFBK – MP3 5:21 mins | Austin on the Dave Ross Show – MP3 7:30 mins | Jim Campbell on the Janet Mefferd Show – MP3 18:15 mins | Doug Napier on AFR Focal Point with Bryan Fischer – MP3 21:55 mins | Jim Campbell with Chris Daniels on KMJ – MP3 14:54 | Austin with Pat Morrison on KPCC Southern Cal. Public Radio.  Austin responds to the question of why this is different than race.  MP3 4:35 mins.

Associated Press: “Rumors have circulated for months that Walker is gay, fueled by the blogosphere and a San Francisco Chronicle column that stated his sexual orientation was an ‘open secret’ in legal and gay activism circles.”

New York Times: “‘We’re working very closely with the county clerk’s office to make sure that everybody who wants to get married Friday, if the stay is removed, can do so,’ Mr. Ting said Thursday in an interview . . . [Jim Campbell], a lawyer with the Alliance Defense Fund, which defended Proposition 8, said that if a stay was not issued, ‘uncertainty’ from any same-sex marriages would be ‘harmful to the public interest’ while the case was under appeal. That could include the administrative burden if government officials had to annul marriages, he said.”

Reuters: “Jim Campbell, an attorney with pro-Proposition 8 Alliance Defense Fund, said supporters have not yet decided whether they would agree to a faster schedule, and he estimated that initial legal briefs defending the law could take two to three months to file. Oral arguments might not begin for another year.”

ABC 15: “‘Prop 8 is almost identical to the constitutional amendment that the people in Arizona enacted in 2008,’ [ADF Attorney Jim Campbell] said. ‘The rationale of that decision could be imported here in Arizona and could have the effect of striking down the marriage amendment in this state.’”

AZFamily.com: “The fate of Arizona’s ban on gay marriage also hangs in the balance . . . [ADF Attorney Jim Campbell] says, ‘This decision could have a real impact in Arizona and the reason is simple: The judges rationalization is that marriage can no longer stand under the Constitution and Arizona. Voters have defined marriage as between a man and woman so the ramifications could bleed over into this state.’”

KSAZ Fox 10: “Arizona passed a proposition very similar to Prop 8 and particularly if the Supreme Court upholds this ruling, that law is going to disappear as well as the laws in all of the other states that have passed anti-gay marriage laws,” said Bill Reber . . . We invited Tim McLaughlin, his partner Tony Felice, the chair of the Greater Phoenix Gay and Lesbian Chamber of Commerce, and attorney [Jim Campbell] with the Alliance Defense Fund, on FOX 10. They represent opposing viewpoints on gay marriage.”

NPR / All Things Considered: “Melissa Block talks to [Jim Campbell] of the Alliance Defense Fund, a conservative legal group, about a federal judge’s ruling that California’s gay marriage ban is unconstitutional.” Excerpt: “And what needs to be emphasized is the ramifications of that conclusion. And essentially, this case is much bigger than just one activist court decision out of San Francisco, a decision that ignored the law, from a court that put itself above the people of California. You know, this case has the potential to affect marriage laws all around the country.” | Audio at link.

David French, Erik Stanley, Joe Infranco, and Jim Campbell appeared on the Hugh Hewitt Show to discuss some of ADF’s latest initiatives. | MP3 32:24 mins | www.adfonhugh.org