Protests Against Obama HHS Mandate Will Return June 8

Erik Stanley: Bill Introduced to Repeal the Johnson Amendment

Arizona Senate Votes to Defund Planned Parenthood

ADF comment on passage of AZ bill to defund Planned Parenthood

Why We Have Gone to Court against the Obama Mandate | Wall Street Journal

Gary McCaleb: Putting Faith Under House Arrest

Executive orders and federal laws

American Religious Right advances in Europe | National Secular Society

School choice a win-win

ADF President Alan Sears comments on passing of Chuck Colson

Lynn-sanity Hits Peoria!

Maryland same sex marriage prevention the task for Catholic group

ADF: Religious discrimination isn’t religious freedom, says brief defending Colo. vouchers

Alan E. Sears: Canadian Ads Tout Selecting a Baby’s Gender Before Birth

Brian Raum: In Defense of the National Organization For Marriage

Michael Norton: Planned Parenthood and Prayers For Death

Hands On Originals lays out defense in discrimination case | Lexington Herald-Leader

David Cortman: Freedom of Religion = Freedom of Worship?

ADF: Businessman allowed to take stand for beliefs

Suit: Planned Parenthood doles drugs illegally: Right to Life says rules being broken

“School vouchers and the religious subversion of church-state separation” | The Guardian

ADF attorney available to media at embryonic stem cell research hearing Monday

Joel Oster: Soldiers At Camp Pendleton Have Religious Freedom As Well

OH: Suit challenges marriage ban repeal’s petition text

Complaint: N.H. P. Parenthood breaking law

Erik Stanley: IRS Remains Mum on Pulpit Initiative

Casey Mattox: Eleven Thousand Reasons Why Planned Parenthood Can’t Be Trusted

    Casey Mattox at Townhall: For the past five years, every dawn has brought additional evidence of the fact that Planned Parenthood and its allies in the abortion industry cannot be trusted to tell the truth about the one thing they should know well – abortion. Just over five years ago, on April 18, 2007, the Supreme Court announced its opinion in Gonzales v. Carhart, holding that the federal Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act was constitutional. Since then, we have lived in a world where partial-birth abortions have been illegal in the United States under federal law (and now many state laws) . . . If we accept Guttmacher’s figure of approximately 2,200 partial-birth abortions per year, then the decision in Gonzales – upholding the law and lifting the injunction against it – has prevented 11,000 partial-birth abortions from occurring.


  • Posted: 04/19/2012
  • |
  • Category: ADF in the News
  • |
  • Source: townhall.com

  • Tags: , , , , , ,

Planned Parenthood illegally distributing abortion pill, legal group says | LifeSiteNews

Sending different message on ‘Day of Silence’

Attorney: Latin American babies under siege | One News Now

Steve Aden: Is Planned Parenthood a Secondhand Dispenser of Federal Funds?

Jones commissioners ignore ACLU, continue prayer: dozens gather to support decision | Sun Journal

Suit: P. Parenthood Illegally Giving Abortion Drug | CBN

Planned Parenthood Violating Abortion Drug Laws in New Hampshire

Alan E. Sears: Eliminating the Competition

    Alan E. Sears at Townhall: The government cloaks its anti-church legal maneuverings as enforcement of the imaginary “separation of church and state” clause that the Left likes to pretend is in the Constitution. But it’s hard not to believe that the state’s real objection to Christian charity is that every church committed to social service eliminates that much more need for government bureaus and subsidies and commissions and tax-payer funded initiatives. Ultimately, a more active church erodes the need for bigger government … and to the Left, nothing is more important than bigger government.


  • Posted: 04/17/2012
  • |
  • Category: Featured
  • |
  • Source: townhall.com

  • Tags: , , , ,

Brazil Condemned for Allowing Abortions on Disabled Babies

    LifeNews: Alliance Defense Fund Senior Legal Counsel Piero Tozzi responded to the decision to allow, what he calls, Brazil’s Supreme Federal Tribunal’s decision to “decriminalize the killing of pre-born children for eugenic reasons.” “Every innocent life deserves to be protected. Instead, Brazil’s high court has approved of slaughtering the country’s most vulnerable people, the severely disabled. Eugenic abortion further erodes respect not only for human dignity in general, but the dignity of the disabled in particular. Protecting the innocent is a chief duty of the legislature, and the court was wrong to overstep its authority and tear down the protections long ago established by Brazil’s lawmakers–protections that are consistent with the pro-life views of most Brazilians.”


  • Posted: 04/17/2012
  • |
  • Category: ADF in the News
  • |
  • Source: www.lifenews.com

  • Tags: , , , , , ,

Truth and Triumph: Faces And Voices Of Those Standing For Religious Liberty

Alan E. Sears: In Rhode Island, a Move to Force Taxpayers to Fund Abortions

Jordan Lorence: New York Churches To March For Equal Access Sunday April 22

ADF comment on Brazil high court’s decision to approve “eugenic abortions”

Free-speech case creates policy changes at Maricopa Community colleges | KTAR

Closing arguments conclude in JPL evolution case

Komen still giving to Planned Parenthood

Bill banning late-term abortions in Arizona awaits governor’s signature | The Georgia Bulletin

Piero Tozzi: Not “rights” Vs. “freedom” – Reclaiming The Universal Declaration From The Left (and Defending It From The Right)

    Piero Tozzi at Turtle Bay and Beyond: A word of caution is in order before adopting the framework and verbiage proposed by McCarthy in its entirety, however, for he throws out the baby with the bathwater, and his characterization of the “utopian” Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948 fails to give a rounded appraisal of that landmark document. Moreover, his underlying premise of “freedoms” vs. “rights” is historically both incorrect and unessential to adopt in order to get to where the author wants to lead us. The concept of “rights,” properly understood, was very much part of the Founding Fathers’ vocabulary — as in the “bill of rights” (!!) and “unalienable rights” based on the “Laws of Nature and Nature’s God.” The tension is thus not between “rights” and “freedoms,” but rather between “negative rights” and “positive” ones — a tension that is reflected in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.


  • Posted: 04/13/2012
  • |
  • Category: ADF in the News
  • |
  • Source: www.turtlebayandbeyond.org

  • Tags: , , , , ,

Video: Eric Metaxas on Bonhoeffer, the Church and Politics | Acton Institute

Free speech gets an upgrade on college campus | One News Now

FFRF still targeting school prayer | One News Now

Free speech returns to Arizona community college district | Sonoran News

Wyoming Admits It Violated Free Speech Rights of Pro-Life Group

Alan E. Sears: ADF Defends Free Speech Rights of Christians Coast to Coast

Engaging the Issues: Austin Nimocks – Discrimination laws and religious freedom

Speech ban imposed in Wyoming’s capitol | One News Now

College drops $50 fee for 1st Amendment | WND

Casey Mattox: Women’s Suicides After Abortion Show What Planned Parenthood Denies

Joe Infranco: A bright spot in the culture battles — the Free Exercise Clause | Baptist Press

Piero A. Tozzi: In Pushing Homosexual Agenda Globally, Obama Admin Seeks to Co-opt, Marginalize Religion

Michael Brown: Can a Muslim Lead the Christian Campus Club? | Townhall

    Michael Brown at Townhall: The university had been sued by the Alliance Defense Fund when, “The school refused to recognize the campus Christian Legal Society chapter, Hastings Christian Fellowship (HCF), because it [would] not agree to a non-discrimination policy that would require the group to admit homosexuals and non-Christians as members and officers . . . Last month, the Supreme Court turned down an appeal brought by the Alliance Defense Fund on behalf of Christian groups challenging the policy at California state universities which did not allow them to restrict “membership in their groups to people who agree with their Christian values and beliefs.” Unfortunately, as noted by ADF attorney Jeremy Tedesco, “one of the key points in the whole case is that every other group on campus is allowed to restrict their membership and their officers to people who agree with the values the group was formed to advocate on campus.”


  • Posted: 04/09/2012
  • |
  • Category: ADF in the News
  • |
  • Source: townhall.com

  • Tags: , , , , , , ,

Dale Schowengerdt: The Administration’s Abdication on DOMA

Wyoming Officials Admit They Violated Pro-Life Group’s Rights

So, Nu? Vhere’s de ADL? | LewRockwell.com

Another 1st Amendment case for a Christian? | One News Now

$1 billion at stake if anti-abortion law passes, state officials warn | Nashua Telegraph

Homeschool Heartbeat Radio: Hope for Sweden

ADF: Wyoming officials admit to violating First Amendment