Diversity Within Student Groups vs. Diversity Across Student Groups

Durham to retire from Oregon Supreme Court: 2 Seats Open on the Court

David L. Hudson: “Clarence Thomas: Court needs to ‘clean up our mess’”

Obama Withdraws Nomination of Charles Day for Maryland District Court

U.S. News Media Group and Best Lawyers® Release 2011-2012 “Best Law Firms” Rankings

LA Times: “Election 2012: A Republican assault on the judiciary”

The Hard Business Problems Facing U.S. Law Faculty

Today – Senate expected to confirm Stephen Higginson to the Fifth Circuit

Law Schools are Not in Crisis

Supreme Court to the Ninth Circuit: No, We Really Mean It

Judges Are for Sale — and Special Interests Are Buying

    Yahoo! News: So who is paying? The new study — by New York University Law School’s Brennan Center for Justice, the National Institute on Money in State Politics, and the Justice at Stake Campaign, a non-partisan reform group — found that a small group of super spenders plays the biggest role, using their money to buy the kind of judges they want hearing their cases.


  • Posted: 10/31/2011
  • |
  • Category: Bench & Bar
  • |
  • Source: news.yahoo.com

  • Tags: , ,

Want Your Attorney Salary to Go Further? Leave NYC for Dallas

Report: Illinois court justice’s successful retention effort nation’s costliest in 25 years

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP: 2010 Claude M. Scarborough, Jr., Award

“Justice Scalia speaks for himself on death penalty, not the Catholic Church” | Washington Post

First Lady: Kagan, Sotomayor Will Protect Right to ‘Love Whomever We Choose’

Colorado Supreme Court candidates say they’re not politically active

Judge nixes Christie request to have N.J. judges contribute more toward pensions and benefits

ADF presents annual Meese Award to Chuck Colson and Dr. Robert P. George

SCOTUS Blog Petition of the Day: Student Speech – Blue Mountain School Dist. v. J.S.

“Lambda Legal Hosts Fair Courts Forums in Des Moines and Iowa City”

Florida Appeals Court Affirms Use of Sharia Law To Determine Whether Arbitration Is Enforceable

The Ugliness Started with Bork

John Yoo: Twenty Years of Justice Thomas

Tax law could hinder quick Supreme Court decision on healthcare mandate

Eugene Volokh: District Court Opinion on the First Amendment and Public University Professors

Republicans Turn Judicial Power Into a Campaign Issue

Law schools pressed to tell the truth on job placement, debt

“S.F. federal court vacancy gives Obama an opening”

Powell sworn in as Virginia Supreme Court justice

The Economics Of Law Favor The Experienced, Survey Says

“Top 10 Law Schools for Career Prospects”

Cain Releases Clarifying Statement: I’m Pro-Life on Abortion

Scalia says High Court’s mistakes of political judgment include: Dred Scott, Roe v. Wade, and Kelo

    The Volokh Conspiracy: “I do not think that the Kelo opinion is long for this world,” Scalia said. “My court has, by my lights, made many mistakes of law during its distinguished two centuries of existence. But it has made very few mistakes of political judgment, of estimating how far … it could stretch beyond the text of the constitution without provoking overwhelming public criticism and resistance. Dred Scott [legalizing slavery [note: Dred Scott did not actually “legalize” slavery, which was already legal in many states; it prevented Congress from forbidding it in federal territories, though states were still permitted to ban it — IS]] was one mistake of that sort. Roe v Wade [legalizing abortion] was another … And Kelo, I think, was a third.”


  • Posted: 10/20/2011
  • |
  • Category: Bench & Bar
  • |
  • Source: volokh.com

  • Tags: , ,

Supreme Court Notebook: Health care law in March?

Applicants Announced for D.C. Superior Court Vacancy

Nixon appoints Judge George Draper to Missouri Supreme Court

At issue: Kline’s ‘ethical misconduct’

Terry Jeffrey: Court Ruling Proves: Kagan Must Recuse from Obamacare litigation

Lawyer who argued for same sex “marriage” appointed to Vermont Supreme Court

Obama nominates Paul Watford to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals

What’s A First-Year Lawyer Worth? Not Much, Say a Growing Number of Corporate Clients Who Refuse to Pay

Justice Scalia Tells Senate ‘Every Banana Republic Has a Bill of Rights’

Supreme Court to hear Stolen Valor case – unauthorized wearing of military medals/ribbons

Brian Faller: Risk from originalist judges outweights risk from “pragamatist” judges who embrace living Constitution

Scott approves loan to keep Fla. courts afloat

Bachmann’s Years at Oral Roberts University

Clarence Thomas’ Influence On The Supreme Court : NPR

Issa subpoenas Holder, Justice for ‘Fast and Furious’ documents

SCOTUS Blog: The timing issue on health care

“Gingrich: Congress, president can ignore courts” | includes video

Why Law Schools Need External Scrutiny

Supreme Court still fuzzy on 10 Commandments

Antonin Scalia Unplugged: Wants to Kill ‘Living’ Constitution

    ABC News:“I’m hoping that the ‘ living’ Constitution will die,” Scalia said, adding that the controversial nature of recent confirmation proceedings is partly attributable to a notion that the Constitution evolves. “It’s like having a mini-constitutional convention every time you select a new judge.”


  • Posted: 10/07/2011
  • |
  • Category: Bench & Bar
  • |
  • Source: abcnews.go.com

  • Tags: ,

Reid’s ‘nuclear option’ changes rules, ends repeat filibusters

The pro-abortion legacy of Justice O’Connor: 30 years after joining the court, the damage continues

Paul Linton: There is No Silver Bullet to Overturning Roe v. Wade

President Obama: ‘Complete Confidence’ In Attorney General Holder

More Women Judges on the Bench Needed, Says Advocate Greenberger

Feds target CA pot dispensaries

Fifteen law schools to be sued over job reporting data

In Hill testimony, justices lift high court’s veil: Breyer and Scalia

Scalia: Judges ‘ain’t what they used to be’

Darrell Issa to Eric Holder: Admit you knew

C.D. Cal. “Gay judicial nominee sails through confirmation hearing”

NC: Online legal firm in Bar fight

    NewsObserver.com: An online legal services company is suing the N.C. State Bar over a long-simmering standoff that highlights the uneasy relationship between private-practice lawyers and inexpensive, do-it-yourself online help for simple law problems. The lawsuit by LegalZoom.com, filed in Wake County Superior Court, asks that a judge declare that the company is entitled to sell standard legal forms on its website and that it be allowed to register in this state to sell prepaid legal services.


  • Posted: 10/05/2011
  • |
  • Category: Bench & Bar
  • |
  • Source: www.newsobserver.com

  • Tags: ,

Benchmark for Antonin Scalia: 25 years on court

Potential cost of defending DOMA goes up as DOJ abandons duties

CAIR Asks Va. Law School to Drop Speaker Who Says ‘Annihilate’ Islam

D.C. Superior Court Advertises Magistrate Judge Position